Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Serpent 710

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2004 | 10:26 PM
  #16621  
Sow&Steady's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,104
From: Va Va Voom!
Default

Originally posted by sparksy
Is there an echo in here?
Its the FOOOORRRCCCCE!
Sow&Steady is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:13 AM
  #16622  
Julius's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,063
From: Amsterdam Netherlands
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Mega's

Originally posted by Sow&Steady
Yes, that's kinda what I was expecting to hear. Just tell us something like ... "oops, we've gotten the diameter of the 16 too small, so we'll re-engineer the 16 with slightly larger one" ... or whatever.

We cant make the 16T bigger. It would make things worse. I've been running the 16T in combination with 59 at the Euro's and been testing with the same gears for a while here at Heemstede. Seems not to be a problem.

If you run 16T I suggest using 59 with it. Maybe 60 but surely NOT 61!
Julius is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:15 AM
  #16623  
InitialD's Avatar
Tech Prophet
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19,679
From: MORDOR
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Mega's

Originally posted by Julius
If you run 16T I suggest using 59 with it. Maybe 60 but surely NOT 61!
Any reason why? So what you're saying is it is not a 16T pinion problem but rather the 61T spur?
InitialD is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:16 AM
  #16624  
Julius's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,063
From: Amsterdam Netherlands
Default

Originally posted by Sow&Steady
You'hit this one on the head. Most of the tracks in recent championships were the large and flowing variety.

The Asian tracks will require the SWB mod.
Actually the track of the Euro's in Austria was quite small with lots of hairpins. The new saver was better there too.

It gives a little more steering in the corner and a little less going in. So you have less chance of the rear en stepping out entering corners. Then you can run slightly more front grip and still have good balance and added steering.
Julius is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:23 AM
  #16625  
InitialD's Avatar
Tech Prophet
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19,679
From: MORDOR
Default

Originally posted by Julius
Actually the track of the Euro's in Austria was quite small with lots of hairpins. The new saver was better there too.

It gives a little more steering in the corner and a little less going in. So you have less chance of the rear en stepping out entering corners. Then you can run slightly more front grip and still have good balance and added steering.
Julius, did any of you guys try to shorten the wheelbase while in Austria?
InitialD is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:24 AM
  #16626  
Julius's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,063
From: Amsterdam Netherlands
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Mega's

Originally posted by InitialD
Any reason why? So what you're saying is it is not a 16T pinion problem but rather the 61T spur?
If you make the diameter bigger you couldnt mesh both 1st and 2nd gear at the same time.

It's the combination of the two that seems to give problems. The 61 has it's teeth clesest together and that gives problems with the meshing with the wide open teeth of the 16.

Actually we'd rather make the 16t smaller in diameter as it would make the teeth a better shape. Unfortunately then you cnat make it fit over the bearing anymore....
Julius is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:26 AM
  #16627  
Julius's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,063
From: Amsterdam Netherlands
Default

Originally posted by InitialD
Julius, did any of you guys try to shorten the wheelbase while in Austria?
Not that I know of.
Julius is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:30 AM
  #16628  
InitialD's Avatar
Tech Prophet
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19,679
From: MORDOR
Default

Originally posted by Julius
Not that I know of.
How would the short wheel base mod be different from the new servo saver? The short wheel base would make the stock servo saver seem to appear "longer" and more angled because the front wheel is moved to the back. Do you think they both have somewhat the same effect?

Also, any truth on a new Team Serpent member in Holand?
InitialD is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:45 AM
  #16629  
Picard's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 759
From: "Make it so"
Default Shock Holes

Gday

When you guys are talking about running 1.2 dia Piston holes are you modifying the standard piston holes or are there 1.2 dia pistons available?
Picard is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:59 AM
  #16630  
Julius's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,063
From: Amsterdam Netherlands
Default Re: Shock Holes

Originally posted by Picard
Gday

When you guys are talking about running 1.2 dia Piston holes are you modifying the standard piston holes or are there 1.2 dia pistons available?
We drill out the holes to 1.2mm
Julius is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 03:05 AM
  #16631  
Julius's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,063
From: Amsterdam Netherlands
Default

Originally posted by InitialD
How would the short wheel base mod be different from the new servo saver? The short wheel base would make the stock servo saver seem to appear "longer" and more angled because the front wheel is moved to the back. Do you think they both have somewhat the same effect?

The short wheelbase has no effect on the servo saver. Although the angle changes a little bit the ackerman is not affected. The new saver has the balls closer together and further away from the pivot point which changes ackerman.

The shorter wheelbase makes the car more compact and therefore rotate slightly easier. The new saver improves front grip in the middle of the corner thus creating higher cornering speeds.
Julius is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 03:06 AM
  #16632  
InitialD's Avatar
Tech Prophet
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19,679
From: MORDOR
Default Re: Shock Holes

Originally posted by Picard
Gday

When you guys are talking about running 1.2 dia Piston holes are you modifying the standard piston holes or are there 1.2 dia pistons available?
I don't think they are available. That's what MS mentioned in the Talk Backs of one of his race reports. Something to do with the mold.

So the only option is to use a 1.2 mm drill bit and open up the existing 1 mm holes. I know it's difficult on the adjustable ones. That is why I use the fixed number of holes type of piston. Easier to drill but the down side is it is not adjustable.
InitialD is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 03:07 AM
  #16633  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 251
Default New Mega's

Hi Julius,

I saw Micheal Salven tested the new Mega's and looking not that fast.
Koen Geurds did use his own modified Nova Rossi, and had some more power.
Why is it? Is it because he was testing relaiability or did he not had the proper gearing?

Bye, Thomas
840918001 is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 03:08 AM
  #16634  
Picard's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 759
From: "Make it so"
Default Re: Re: Shock Holes

Originally posted by Julius
We drill out the holes to 1.2mm
Thanks julius..Is there any plans in the near future to release these pistons already modified?
Picard is offline  
Old 09-30-2004 | 03:08 AM
  #16635  
InitialD's Avatar
Tech Prophet
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19,679
From: MORDOR
Default

Originally posted by Julius
The short wheelbase has no effect on the servo saver. Although the angle changes a little bit the ackerman is not affected. The new saver has the balls closer together and further away from the pivot point which changes ackerman.

The shorter wheelbase makes the car more compact and therefore rotate slightly easier. The new saver improves front grip in the middle of the corner thus creating higher cornering speeds.
Thanks for the info Julius. Are you making a stop in Brazil for the worlds?
InitialD is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.