Serpent 710
Originally posted by Sow&Steady
Yes, that's kinda what I was expecting to hear. Just tell us something like ... "oops, we've gotten the diameter of the 16 too small, so we'll re-engineer the 16 with slightly larger one" ... or whatever.
Yes, that's kinda what I was expecting to hear. Just tell us something like ... "oops, we've gotten the diameter of the 16 too small, so we'll re-engineer the 16 with slightly larger one" ... or whatever.
If you run 16T I suggest using 59 with it. Maybe 60 but surely NOT 61!
Originally posted by Julius
If you run 16T I suggest using 59 with it. Maybe 60 but surely NOT 61!
If you run 16T I suggest using 59 with it. Maybe 60 but surely NOT 61!
So what you're saying is it is not a 16T pinion problem but rather the 61T spur?
Originally posted by Sow&Steady
You'hit this one on the head. Most of the tracks in recent championships were the large and flowing variety.
The Asian tracks will require the SWB mod.
You'hit this one on the head. Most of the tracks in recent championships were the large and flowing variety.
The Asian tracks will require the SWB mod.
It gives a little more steering in the corner and a little less going in. So you have less chance of the rear en stepping out entering corners. Then you can run slightly more front grip and still have good balance and added steering.
Originally posted by Julius
Actually the track of the Euro's in Austria was quite small with lots of hairpins. The new saver was better there too.
It gives a little more steering in the corner and a little less going in. So you have less chance of the rear en stepping out entering corners. Then you can run slightly more front grip and still have good balance and added steering.
Actually the track of the Euro's in Austria was quite small with lots of hairpins. The new saver was better there too.
It gives a little more steering in the corner and a little less going in. So you have less chance of the rear en stepping out entering corners. Then you can run slightly more front grip and still have good balance and added steering.
Originally posted by InitialD
Any reason why?
So what you're saying is it is not a 16T pinion problem but rather the 61T spur?
Any reason why?
So what you're saying is it is not a 16T pinion problem but rather the 61T spur?
It's the combination of the two that seems to give problems. The 61 has it's teeth clesest together and that gives problems with the meshing with the wide open teeth of the 16.
Actually we'd rather make the 16t smaller in diameter as it would make the teeth a better shape. Unfortunately then you cnat make it fit over the bearing anymore....
Originally posted by Julius
Not that I know of.
Not that I know of.
Also, any truth on a new Team Serpent member in Holand?
Originally posted by Picard
Gday
When you guys are talking about running 1.2 dia Piston holes are you modifying the standard piston holes or are there 1.2 dia pistons available?
Gday
When you guys are talking about running 1.2 dia Piston holes are you modifying the standard piston holes or are there 1.2 dia pistons available?
Originally posted by InitialD
How would the short wheel base mod be different from the new servo saver? The short wheel base would make the stock servo saver seem to appear "longer" and more angled because the front wheel is moved to the back. Do you think they both have somewhat the same effect?
How would the short wheel base mod be different from the new servo saver? The short wheel base would make the stock servo saver seem to appear "longer" and more angled because the front wheel is moved to the back. Do you think they both have somewhat the same effect?
The short wheelbase has no effect on the servo saver. Although the angle changes a little bit the ackerman is not affected. The new saver has the balls closer together and further away from the pivot point which changes ackerman.
The shorter wheelbase makes the car more compact and therefore rotate slightly easier. The new saver improves front grip in the middle of the corner thus creating higher cornering speeds.
Originally posted by Picard
Gday
When you guys are talking about running 1.2 dia Piston holes are you modifying the standard piston holes or are there 1.2 dia pistons available?
Gday
When you guys are talking about running 1.2 dia Piston holes are you modifying the standard piston holes or are there 1.2 dia pistons available?
So the only option is to use a 1.2 mm drill bit and open up the existing 1 mm holes. I know it's difficult on the adjustable ones. That is why I use the fixed number of holes type of piston. Easier to drill but the down side is it is not adjustable.
Tech Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 251
Hi Julius,
I saw Micheal Salven tested the new Mega's and looking not that fast.
Koen Geurds did use his own modified Nova Rossi, and had some more power.
Why is it? Is it because he was testing relaiability or did he not had the proper gearing?
Bye, Thomas
I saw Micheal Salven tested the new Mega's and looking not that fast.
Koen Geurds did use his own modified Nova Rossi, and had some more power.
Why is it? Is it because he was testing relaiability or did he not had the proper gearing?
Bye, Thomas
Originally posted by Julius
The short wheelbase has no effect on the servo saver. Although the angle changes a little bit the ackerman is not affected. The new saver has the balls closer together and further away from the pivot point which changes ackerman.
The shorter wheelbase makes the car more compact and therefore rotate slightly easier. The new saver improves front grip in the middle of the corner thus creating higher cornering speeds.
The short wheelbase has no effect on the servo saver. Although the angle changes a little bit the ackerman is not affected. The new saver has the balls closer together and further away from the pivot point which changes ackerman.
The shorter wheelbase makes the car more compact and therefore rotate slightly easier. The new saver improves front grip in the middle of the corner thus creating higher cornering speeds.
Are you making a stop in Brazil for the worlds?



