NOVAROSSI Engine thread....
#7396
Why would almost every pro driver run a 9901/41021 or 2096/41021 pipeset on nearly EVERY nova engine made
Fyi , i have turned a few "PRO" drivers onto 9853/41005 setup and every one was like " why was i running the other pipe on my truck?"
Fyi , i have turned a few "PRO" drivers onto 9853/41005 setup and every one was like " why was i running the other pipe on my truck?"
#7397
hey got the novarossi roma .25 truggy engine replaced the rear bearing with a boca ceramic.
and i just checked it all after racing on the weekend and when i do up the clutch nut tight.
the crank rubs on the other of the rear bearing causing friction.
i tried retightening the bearing in case it wasnt seated properly, same thing the spin of the flywheel feels friction.
bearing size 14 x 25.8 x 6mm
and i just checked it all after racing on the weekend and when i do up the clutch nut tight.
the crank rubs on the other of the rear bearing causing friction.
i tried retightening the bearing in case it wasnt seated properly, same thing the spin of the flywheel feels friction.
bearing size 14 x 25.8 x 6mm
#7398
Tech Master
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,842
From: Norway
Thats because the 9853 is not EFRA/IFMAR leagal. It has not been for many many MANY years. That is why the PRO drives does not use it.... Outside the US anyway .-)
#7400
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 260
This does happen sometimes when replacing engine bearings. I would venture to guess the pressure applied to seat the rear bearing might've pressed the front bearing in just a tad. No worries, install a 7x9mm washer or shim behind your flywheel collet. Try Ofna 10099 clutch shim kit http://www.absolutehobbyz.com/produc...roducts_id=852
same thing seems the outer part of the crank is rubbing the outer race of the bearing.
i tried installing the o.s xzb crank to check this and tightened up clutch nut real tight and it was loose and spins free.
looking for a fix on this engine. ( i dont recall checking this when original bearing installed so i am unsure)
#7401
yes tried installing 1 then 2 shims behind the collet.
same thing seems the outer part of the crank is rubbing the outer race of the bearing.
i tried installing the o.s xzb crank to check this and tightened up clutch nut real tight and it was loose and spins free.
looking for a fix on this engine. ( i dont recall checking this when original bearing installed so i am unsure)
same thing seems the outer part of the crank is rubbing the outer race of the bearing.
i tried installing the o.s xzb crank to check this and tightened up clutch nut real tight and it was loose and spins free.
looking for a fix on this engine. ( i dont recall checking this when original bearing installed so i am unsure)
#7402
there is no contest Monty.... your pipe choices are why you and others think this engine is soft on the bottom end....... 2084/41005 was horrendous dude, you recommend this to people and its no wonder they all come back saying the engine is soft down low.....
#7404
The whole thing with pipe set choices and soft bottom ends etc is that this is something every driver has a different opinion on and basically you have two types of attitudes
You can have many a 7 port set up with a 9901/21 and many drivers will find this has a very strong bottom end, perfect mid range and a screaming top.. all whilst returning excellent run times. This is usually what more matured pro type drivers will want who know that too much power hurts their lap times
Then you get what i am going to call "the other type of racer" who wants an engine that just fries all the tires as soon as he touches the throttle, Some people like this and they may not care what their run times are like or how the wheelspin more often than not has adverse affects on there lap times, These guys wont be happy with a 2096 or a 9901 and 41021 manifolds, they are generally the newer type racers that just want to grab a handful of throttle regardless of anything else
There is no real right or wrong but there are two mind sets and i think that is what is been debated here
I have seen it time over where some of the best drivers we have in Australia honestly don't know what to do with all the power they have with a 9901/41021, yet you can have some one else with exactly the same set up saying "its soft on bottom"
People can only do/use what they feel best suits their needs
Its all learning and or personal preference
Dave,
FUSION X ENGINES AUSTRALIA
You can have many a 7 port set up with a 9901/21 and many drivers will find this has a very strong bottom end, perfect mid range and a screaming top.. all whilst returning excellent run times. This is usually what more matured pro type drivers will want who know that too much power hurts their lap times
Then you get what i am going to call "the other type of racer" who wants an engine that just fries all the tires as soon as he touches the throttle, Some people like this and they may not care what their run times are like or how the wheelspin more often than not has adverse affects on there lap times, These guys wont be happy with a 2096 or a 9901 and 41021 manifolds, they are generally the newer type racers that just want to grab a handful of throttle regardless of anything else
There is no real right or wrong but there are two mind sets and i think that is what is been debated here
I have seen it time over where some of the best drivers we have in Australia honestly don't know what to do with all the power they have with a 9901/41021, yet you can have some one else with exactly the same set up saying "its soft on bottom"
People can only do/use what they feel best suits their needs
Its all learning and or personal preference
Dave,
FUSION X ENGINES AUSTRALIA
#7405
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 260
Oh...my bad, I finally re-read your post. That's a very strange issue. Is the friction there when you have the backplate off? If you haven't checked, remove the back plate, install nova crank, install/tighten flywheel then spin the flywheel to see if resistance is there. If no resistance then your crank is not fully seating into the rear main bearing and the friction is from the backplate.
i managed to rid of the friction though when i tighten up the werks flywheel it isnt as free spinning.
i need to tighten up the nut real tight so the flywheel doesnt slip.
when i spin the flywheel it only spins once like a 360 turn and if i turn it with my hand it feels better then before mnore (loose)
though it doesnt spin free like a clutchbell does. is that normal?
its from the flywhell nut tightening up pulling the crank pressure on the inner of the bearing which is pressure on the balls from the inner of bearing being pressure pulled . lol is this normal?
#7406
The whole thing with pipe set choices and soft bottom ends etc is that this is something every driver has a different opinion on and basically you have two types of attitudes
You can have many a 7 port set up with a 9901/21 and many drivers will find this has a very strong bottom end, perfect mid range and a screaming top.. all whilst returning excellent run times. This is usually what more matured pro type drivers will want who know that too much power hurts their lap times
Then you get what i am going to call "the other type of racer" who wants an engine that just fries all the tires as soon as he touches the throttle, Some people like this and they may not care what their run times are like or how the wheelspin more often than not has adverse affects on there lap times, These guys wont be happy with a 2096 or a 9901 and 41021 manifolds, they are generally the newer type racers that just want to grab a handful of throttle regardless of anything else
There is no real right or wrong but there are two mind sets and i think that is what is been debated here
I have seen it time over where some of the best drivers we have in Australia honestly don't know what to do with all the power they have with a 9901/41021, yet you can have some one else with exactly the same set up saying "its soft on bottom"
People can only do/use what they feel best suits their needs
Its all learning and or personal preference
Dave,
FUSION X ENGINES AUSTRALIA
You can have many a 7 port set up with a 9901/21 and many drivers will find this has a very strong bottom end, perfect mid range and a screaming top.. all whilst returning excellent run times. This is usually what more matured pro type drivers will want who know that too much power hurts their lap times
Then you get what i am going to call "the other type of racer" who wants an engine that just fries all the tires as soon as he touches the throttle, Some people like this and they may not care what their run times are like or how the wheelspin more often than not has adverse affects on there lap times, These guys wont be happy with a 2096 or a 9901 and 41021 manifolds, they are generally the newer type racers that just want to grab a handful of throttle regardless of anything else
There is no real right or wrong but there are two mind sets and i think that is what is been debated here
I have seen it time over where some of the best drivers we have in Australia honestly don't know what to do with all the power they have with a 9901/41021, yet you can have some one else with exactly the same set up saying "its soft on bottom"
People can only do/use what they feel best suits their needs
Its all learning and or personal preference
Dave,
FUSION X ENGINES AUSTRALIA
what is your own personal experience with a Bonito and a 9886/41001 combo ? have you personally run this combo back to back against the combo Monty always tells people ? have you tried a 41005 manifold vs a 41001 Manifold on this engine using all the different Nova pipes ? Have you even run a Bonito yourself ? or are you commenting based off what you think you know ( which many here love to do )................

everyone always says how the Bonito is soft and mild down low, yet everyone is always running the same pipe as all the other sheep are running who also say the engine is soft down low.....
I can tell you once you use a 41001/9886 you won't be saying a Bonito is lacking bottom end...We run on an extremely high bite surface and we need all the bottom end grunt possible and no other pipe/manifold combo gives the Bonito its full bottom end power...with this pipe we can run a lower clutch stall then any other pipe, the powerband is linear and full across the entire RPM range...With Monty;'s suggested combos the engine lacks both bottom and top...He used to recommend the 2084/41005 and when I ran it i thought it was a joke, the engine was so neutered it was nearly unusable on our track surface, bottom end was flat, dead and nearly non existent, top end was reduced over 6 MPH over the 9886, and this is only on a 160' straight....
Anyways there is a reason why most say the Bonito lacks bottom, and a reason why we all choose run the Bonito because of its above average bottom end power.....pipe and manifold selection makes or breaks this engine..if you want to flatten the power and lose bottom end listen to Monty..if you want to have strong bottom and run a lower clutch stall then listen to me !
#7407
Tech Regular
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 280
I apologize in advance for any dirt this may stir up -- but I know there has been alot of movement in the U.S. market in the past couple years, so looking for the latest:
Who is the official U.S. Distributor for Novarossi? Saw a press release that Nova USA is coming with O'Donnell at the helm...is this reality, or something that is coming in the "future"? What about the guy in AL that has Rex/Top -- does he also have the Nova line? Looking for a single source with the deepest inventory.
Thanks!
Who is the official U.S. Distributor for Novarossi? Saw a press release that Nova USA is coming with O'Donnell at the helm...is this reality, or something that is coming in the "future"? What about the guy in AL that has Rex/Top -- does he also have the Nova line? Looking for a single source with the deepest inventory.
Thanks!
#7408
stop the malarky already ! this is not how it is !
what is your own personal experience with a Bonito and a 9886/41001 combo ? have you personally run this combo back to back against the combo Monty always tells people ? have you tried a 41005 manifold vs a 41001 Manifold on this engine using all the different Nova pipes ? Have you even run a Bonito yourself ? or are you commenting based off what you think you know ( which many here love to do )................
everyone always says how the Bonito is soft and mild down low, yet everyone is always running the same pipe as all the other sheep are running who also say the engine is soft down low.....
I can tell you once you use a 41001/9886 you won't be saying a Bonito is lacking bottom end...We run on an extremely high bite surface and we need all the bottom end grunt possible and no other pipe/manifold combo gives the Bonito its full bottom end power...with this pipe we can run a lower clutch stall then any other pipe, the powerband is linear and full across the entire RPM range...With Monty;'s suggested combos the engine lacks both bottom and top...He used to recommend the 2084/41005 and when I ran it i thought it was a joke, the engine was so neutered it was nearly unusable on our track surface, bottom end was flat, dead and nearly non existent, top end was reduced over 6 MPH over the 9886, and this is only on a 160' straight....
Anyways there is a reason why most say the Bonito lacks bottom, and a reason why we all choose run the Bonito because of its above average bottom end power.....pipe and manifold selection makes or breaks this engine..if you want to flatten the power and lose bottom end listen to Monty..if you want to have strong bottom and run a lower clutch stall then listen to me !
what is your own personal experience with a Bonito and a 9886/41001 combo ? have you personally run this combo back to back against the combo Monty always tells people ? have you tried a 41005 manifold vs a 41001 Manifold on this engine using all the different Nova pipes ? Have you even run a Bonito yourself ? or are you commenting based off what you think you know ( which many here love to do )................

everyone always says how the Bonito is soft and mild down low, yet everyone is always running the same pipe as all the other sheep are running who also say the engine is soft down low.....
I can tell you once you use a 41001/9886 you won't be saying a Bonito is lacking bottom end...We run on an extremely high bite surface and we need all the bottom end grunt possible and no other pipe/manifold combo gives the Bonito its full bottom end power...with this pipe we can run a lower clutch stall then any other pipe, the powerband is linear and full across the entire RPM range...With Monty;'s suggested combos the engine lacks both bottom and top...He used to recommend the 2084/41005 and when I ran it i thought it was a joke, the engine was so neutered it was nearly unusable on our track surface, bottom end was flat, dead and nearly non existent, top end was reduced over 6 MPH over the 9886, and this is only on a 160' straight....
Anyways there is a reason why most say the Bonito lacks bottom, and a reason why we all choose run the Bonito because of its above average bottom end power.....pipe and manifold selection makes or breaks this engine..if you want to flatten the power and lose bottom end listen to Monty..if you want to have strong bottom and run a lower clutch stall then listen to me !
Most tracks in the US don't have the grip of yours or 160' straightaways. I've tried your combo on a tuned Bonito and stock Keep-Off XLS...the truggy was undriveable, the powerband was simply retarded. Oh sure, it had bottom, top, mid, upper, lower, and everywhere in between power. I re-clutched and while it helped the power was too much for the surface even when the moisture/grip came up. If I was drag racing or on a very, very high grip track treated with sugar or such , then maybe but otherwise such a pipe/header combo would be a waste of money. I'm not the only one, there have been others in my region who tried and went back to the recommended 9901/021 setup. Is is ideal? Maybe/maybe not...but it works very well for me and my driving style which is fast but not overly aggressive.
Be nice...humility is your friend.
#7409
You made your point Neal, many times on this thread.
Most tracks in the US don't have the grip of yours or 160' straightaways. I've tried your combo on a tuned Bonito and stock Keep-Off XLS...the truggy was undriveable, the powerband was simply retarded. Oh sure, it had bottom, top, mid, upper, lower, and everywhere in between power. I re-clutched and while it helped the power was too much for the surface even when the moisture/grip came up. If I was drag racing or on a very, very high grip track treated with sugar or such , then maybe but otherwise such a pipe/header combo would be a waste of money. I'm not the only one, there have been others in my region who tried and went back to the recommended 9901/021 setup. Is is ideal? Maybe/maybe not...but it works very well for me and my driving style which is fast but not overly aggressive.
Be nice...humility is your friend.
Most tracks in the US don't have the grip of yours or 160' straightaways. I've tried your combo on a tuned Bonito and stock Keep-Off XLS...the truggy was undriveable, the powerband was simply retarded. Oh sure, it had bottom, top, mid, upper, lower, and everywhere in between power. I re-clutched and while it helped the power was too much for the surface even when the moisture/grip came up. If I was drag racing or on a very, very high grip track treated with sugar or such , then maybe but otherwise such a pipe/header combo would be a waste of money. I'm not the only one, there have been others in my region who tried and went back to the recommended 9901/021 setup. Is is ideal? Maybe/maybe not...but it works very well for me and my driving style which is fast but not overly aggressive.
Be nice...humility is your friend.

#7410
Hey their Rob...nice to hear from you. Last we spoke you were struggling a bit with your health. Was thinking about you over the holidays, gosh I hope you're doing better these days. Sure miss racing with you, we always have a blast.
Well said...slick indeed. And to think we should all have electric smooth trigger fingers by now, right?
Well said...slick indeed. And to think we should all have electric smooth trigger fingers by now, right?



352Likes