NOVAROSSI Engine thread....
#5837
Tech Master
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,628
#5838
#5839
Regards,
Michael.
#5840
Tech Master
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,842
From: Norway
Reports from several Sources is that the keep-off has better snap to it that the BTT. I think both Clockwork and Murnan have said this, so it is more to it than just cosmetics :-)
There is alot more to an engine than piston/sleeve and crankshaft
There is alot more to an engine than piston/sleeve and crankshaft
#5841
we all know there is allot more.. the block design is only different to receive the new bearing... the bearing gives less resistance so it should help spool up faster.. from what i was told the timing is all the same
#5842
#5843
I decided to go with the keep off 21-4. I was also considering the Lucky 7 tuned. But I would rather give up a little speed for the smooth linear power. what pipe header is recommended for the keep off?
#5844
Look at what the big boys r running Vinny , either 9901 or 2096 with 41021
#5845
I've never run things just because everyone else runs them. I make my own decisions based on testing the pipe and header combos.
The 2096 is a great pipe although I rarely use it, It seems to be the most well rounded pipe, but I typically run the 9853 41001 header on smaller tracks or tracks with tough to clear jumps, and for bigger tracks the 9886 41001 header is really good. I ran that combo at Thornhill with a Clocked btt wc, It's big wide open track and flowed nicely and allowed me to run the engine right on tune and not too lean and make silly top end. it was just easier on the engine and stayed consistent and cooler than 3 chambered pipes do. The 2096 runs great but wants the top leaned slightly too much to make higher rpm's. Not really a big deal but not ideal for tuning. The 41029 header works great too and seems to fit better on most narrower chassis and I've never been disappointed in the 41021 although is sometimes does not fit very well in several chassis. I had a 9901 pipe for a while and it just seemed to restrictive and slow overall. I tend to drive smooth and like a bit more punch than most to keep me driving harder.
The 2096 is a great pipe although I rarely use it, It seems to be the most well rounded pipe, but I typically run the 9853 41001 header on smaller tracks or tracks with tough to clear jumps, and for bigger tracks the 9886 41001 header is really good. I ran that combo at Thornhill with a Clocked btt wc, It's big wide open track and flowed nicely and allowed me to run the engine right on tune and not too lean and make silly top end. it was just easier on the engine and stayed consistent and cooler than 3 chambered pipes do. The 2096 runs great but wants the top leaned slightly too much to make higher rpm's. Not really a big deal but not ideal for tuning. The 41029 header works great too and seems to fit better on most narrower chassis and I've never been disappointed in the 41021 although is sometimes does not fit very well in several chassis. I had a 9901 pipe for a while and it just seemed to restrictive and slow overall. I tend to drive smooth and like a bit more punch than most to keep me driving harder.
#5846
I am assuming you know Anthony M. He likes the 9901/41021 combo and seems to stick with it everywhere I have seen him run at. I like the 2096/41021 combo since i am not as smooth on the bottom end with my trigger finger as I should be.
#5848
http://www.avidrc.com/product/1/bear...-bearings.html
#5849
I was wondering how many gallons went through your keep off before it needed to be replaced.
Last edited by merdith6; 08-05-2013 at 02:05 PM.



352Likes