R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Electric Off-Road (https://www.rctech.net/forum/electric-off-road-4/)
-   -   Team Associated B4.2 Thread (https://www.rctech.net/forum/electric-off-road/694124-team-associated-b4-2-thread.html)

lala4fire 01-13-2013 08:04 PM

Thanks for the quick answer.

GizmoTLR 01-13-2013 08:11 PM

Damn i just bought my 4.1 last weekend. Dont kno if im going to buy the kit or just get the upgraded parts. Mainly the BB shocks and new slipper look like the biggest change aside from the now front hex wheel mounts

2canSAM 01-13-2013 08:32 PM


Originally Posted by lala4fire (Post 11672929)
Sorry, I'm super confused....I'm reading about matric and standard hardware like its something new that has come out. I currently race a FT sc10 and have a b4.2 on order. Did the hardware sizing change and now I have to buy new hex drivers and nut drivers? Thanks for setting my mind at ease.

It is all standard except the motor mounting screws are 2.5mm. What you use for your SC10 will work perfect for the B4.x.

trdsupra88 01-13-2013 09:12 PM


Originally Posted by Cridd (Post 11669501)
Ballast weight won't fit in my car, followed directions but it hits diff?

Make sure the circled stamp on the weight is either facing front or rear of the car...

Tradin Paint 01-13-2013 09:21 PM


Originally Posted by ilanstylz (Post 11672778)
Stock class you don't want to use anything IMO lower then a 50c rating...... A stock blinky class you will def. notice the difference between a 25c and 50c lipo. I personally run nothing lower then a 60c and have a few at 70c...... So it def. matters in stock what lipo's you run. Which is why I also run shorties only because they are lighter then stick packs with same ratings........

I run 65 and 70C shorties in my 17.5 buggy also and there is a decent driver who has been racing for a long time that keeps telling me that I am losing power by running the shorties. His theory is that true battery power is calculated by taking the MaH rating x C rating. Since most full packs have a higher MaH rating that would make full packs more powerful and he says that extra power will out performance the gain from the weight loss in running a shorty.

Is there any truth to this, it sounds justifiable?

DanielC. 01-13-2013 09:33 PM


Originally Posted by Tradin Paint (Post 11673318)
I run 65 and 70C shorties in my 17.5 buggy also and there is a decent driver who has been racing for a long time that keeps telling me that I am losing power by running the shorties. His theory is that true battery power is calculated by taking the MaH rating x C rating. Since most full packs have a higher MaH rating that would make full packs more powerful and he says that extra power will out performance the gain from the weight loss in running a shorty.

Is there any truth to this, it sounds justifiable?

The "punch" you get out of a pack is more reliant on the internal resistance than the capacity, up to a point. Around here most of the fast guys in blinky run high C rating shorty packs in their buggies.

ilanstylz 01-13-2013 09:35 PM


Originally Posted by Tradin Paint (Post 11673318)
I run 65 and 70C shorties in my 17.5 buggy also and there is a decent driver who has been racing for a long time that keeps telling me that I am losing power by running the shorties. His theory is that true battery power is calculated by taking the MaH rating x C rating. Since most full packs have a higher MaH rating that would make full packs more powerful and he says that extra power will out performance the gain from the weight loss in running a shorty.

Is there any truth to this, it sounds justifiable?

Iono all my packs are 60c-70c even my stick packs. And I never noticed a difference running either shorty or stick pack with same c rating even though my stick packs had higher mah's......... My guess is the stick packs with higher mah's the power would last longer say after a 10min run there may be a noticeable difference between the two packs............ I'm going to test that theory out next time at the track and try to run my 4600mah 70c shorty vs. my 5600mah 70c stick pack and see if I notice a power drop after running both to LVC..........

Cridd 01-14-2013 12:01 AM


Originally Posted by trdsupra88 (Post 11673282)
Make sure the circled stamp on the weight is either facing front or rear of the car...

It was the stock arm mount, so went withy he 3 degree and 2 anti squat then it fit. Thanks

Cridd 01-14-2013 12:04 AM


Originally Posted by ilanstylz (Post 11673367)
Iono all my packs are 60c-70c even my stick packs. And I never noticed a difference running either shorty or stick pack with same c rating even though my stick packs had higher mah's......... My guess is the stick packs with higher mah's the power would last longer say after a 10min run there may be a noticeable difference between the two packs............ I'm going to test that theory out next time at the track and try to run my 4600mah 70c shorty vs. my 5600mah 70c stick pack and see if I notice a power drop after running both to LVC..........

What about a 120c max amps?

Leodis 01-14-2013 01:34 AM


Originally Posted by Tradin Paint (Post 11673318)
His theory is that true battery power is calculated by taking the MaH rating x C rating.

It's not a theory. It's a simple physics formula.

That said, I doubt very many people running offroad could notice the difference between a stick pack and a shorty pack with the same c rating. And if they can, they're probably sandbaggers who shouldn't be running in spec classes anyways.

Wildcat1971 01-14-2013 03:50 AM

Well there are 80c 4500 shorties out not with the same weights at the 4k 65c packs. So in 8 minute mains, I doubt would would notice the difference. two weeks ago, I hoped up on the drivers stand for the mains and to my surprise the RD said, ok here goes the 10 minute main. The first 3-4 laps I definitely had more power, but the next 14 felt the same. I didnt really notice a taper off. But my full packs always did the same thing. But.... Not all tracks and layouts are equal. Some tracks you really need to keep the power higher longer. That is where you will really be able to tell the difference. Competition hobbies is the track that comes to mind. Those guys love 180's into a triple. But at CV we have guys in 17.5 running 3800mah 2 year old 30c packs and they are fine.

ilanstylz 01-14-2013 07:47 AM


Originally Posted by Cridd (Post 11673665)
What about a 120c max amps?

Don't know never tried them, and from what I've heard and read about the max amps lie about their true ratings. Don't quote me on that but I would never spend that much on a lipo anyhow so no way for me to find out for myself on how they perform.....

Cain 01-14-2013 08:57 AM

maxamps rating is a burst rating, I have asked them this a few times and they state it as such each time. They used to have a description on there site stating what TrueC was but as I was told, removed it as it was confusing people. To me at least, I think its more confusing NOT having that there. Other companies are also using the burst rating as well with it stated in small print.

Wildcat1971 01-14-2013 09:19 AM

@07forrester - I have updated the B4.1 first pagee to reflect some information. Feel free to steal what ever content you want for this thread.

07Forester 01-14-2013 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by Wildcat1971 (Post 11674958)
@07forrester - I have updated the B4.1 first pagee to reflect some information. Feel free to steal what ever content you want for this thread.

Thanks wildcat. Ill make sure to take a look.


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 02:14 PM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.