Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree352Likes

NOVAROSSI Engine thread....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2016 | 02:39 PM
  #8731  
BigInJapan's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 747
Default

Originally Posted by Maximo
The square manifolds make quite a bit more power and RPM then do the curved manifolds...41032 smashes the 41033 just the same as a 41019 smashes a 41021........... 9853/9886 will substantially outperform the 2096 , and there will be no issue with run time, in fact the 9886 combo may even get better runtime considering your capped out looking for more top.... These 2 chamber pipes used to be the go to pipe till EFFRA forced a 3 chamber rule 10 years ago.........the rule was enacted because EFFRA wanted to slow the engines down and make every quieter.. Bad news is the 3 chamber pipes reduce power more effectively then they reduce noise......so basically racers everywhere are now running pipes thats primary purpose is to slow the engines down and reduce noise instead of pipes developed for performance and efficiency........ And no you don't increase mileage in a engine by choking off its exhaust so throw that concept out the window......
Not to quarrel but you can also throw lap times out he window with an over powered light switch type engine, and I don't just mean low end, all through the rpm range...
BigInJapan is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 03:10 PM
  #8732  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by BigInJapan
Not to quarrel but you can also throw lap times out he window with an over powered light switch type engine, and I don't just mean low end, all through the rpm range...
I don't know anything about that....I guess if someone buys a drag engine and sets it up with stock gearing on a slippery track there may be an issue....... but taking a stock or near stock Elite 5 and putting on a 9853/41001 isn't going to make it some tire spinning monster that uses its fuel tank in 5 minutes..... coming from a 2096/41021 its going to give the engine a stronger feel throughout the powerband with a noticeably better top end run out and about the same fuel mileage..on a track needing more power it may even get better mileage.... If your having trouble handling a stock Elite 5 with a 2096/41021 then you probably wont want to go to one of the better performing 2 chamber pipes....but if your like some guys and the 2096/41021 isn't enough for you then you can easily find more power with just a basic pipe and manifold swap....
Maximo is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 04:10 PM
  #8733  
Suspended
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,121
Default

Originally Posted by Maximo
I don't know anything about that....I guess if someone buys a drag engine and sets it up with stock gearing on a slippery track there may be an issue....... but taking a stock or near stock Elite 5 and putting on a 9853/41001 isn't going to make it some tire spinning monster that uses its fuel tank in 5 minutes..... coming from a 2096/41021 its going to give the engine a stronger feel throughout the powerband with a noticeably better top end run out and about the same fuel mileage..on a track needing more power it may even get better mileage.... If your having trouble handling a stock Elite 5 with a 2096/41021 then you probably wont want to go to one of the better performing 2 chamber pipes....but if your like some guys and the 2096/41021 isn't enough for you then you can easily find more power with just a basic pipe and manifold swap....
The more air you flow, the more fuel you flow. There's no way around it.
Socket is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 04:16 PM
  #8734  
rider313's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,436
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by Socket
The more air you flow, the more fuel you flow. There's no way around it.
But when the more airflow pipe set makes more power you pull less trigger limiting the airflow at the carb = same mileage. Simple solution for such a simple statement.
rider313 is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 04:25 PM
  #8735  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by Socket
The more air you flow, the more fuel you flow. There's no way around it.
Not true on loop scavenging 2 strokes ! a huge amount of power is created by how efficiently the pipe can recycle mixture that has already blown thru the engine into the exhaust, power and efficiency are actually quite intertwined... the most powerful setups usually are using the fuel most efficiently ..
Maximo is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 04:30 PM
  #8736  
Suspended
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,121
Default

Originally Posted by rider313
But when the more airflow pipe set makes more power you pull less trigger limiting the airflow at the carb = same mileage. Simple solution for such a simple statement.
Hey, great on paper. But someone who is noodled and lacks throttle control won't pull less trigger.
Socket is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 04:36 PM
  #8737  
rider313's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,436
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by Socket
Hey, great on paper. But someone who is noodled and lacks throttle control won't pull less trigger.

So then you agree with Neil it's all about driver control.
rider313 is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 06:22 PM
  #8738  
kgombe's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,513
Default

The pipe restriction is for noise ordinance and fuel economy for the environment... people will say what they want, but having one less thing to focus on (trigger) while driving will make you a better driver...

Furthermore more US drivers are not bound to that rule during their Local events, such as roar Nats, but yet they will not run these "power" pipes on their engines, the cars are over powered to say the least and making the car drive able is the main objective...

World champion drivers use these pipes and smaller inserts, what wins on Sunday sell on Monday..
kgombe is offline  
Old 02-09-2016 | 10:51 PM
  #8739  
am
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,842
From: Norway
Default

Originally Posted by Socket
The more air you flow, the more fuel you flow. There's no way around it.
Well yes and no, it is a bit more complex than that.
When you modify an engine, and you do it right, you improve on the engines effiiency... That means more energy out with the same amount of energy in as before the modifications were done.
am is offline  
Old 02-10-2016 | 04:34 AM
  #8740  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

All I know is the same crap was said about the 2058 a few years back when I was recommending it on almost every engine...... a Few years later the 2058 is now accepted as one of the best all around go to pipes... Even when pro's try the 2058 they like it...so much so one even had his own pipe modeled after it..... RC racing is as much or more about fads then it is about anything else... 10 years ago these new pipes rules came it changed the pipes these racers run, to the point I doubt many of todays racers have even tried a 9886 or 9853........ Sure going to be interesting once they do ! and realize the 2058 was nothing next to the 9886/9853 ! all the things people like about the 2058 these pipes do even better !

Also there is no proof anywhere that the EFFRA legal pipes get better mileage, in fact I would suspect they get worse mileage....choking the exhaust is not a way to make any engine more efficient, choking the exhaust actually makes them work harder for the power they produce ! In fact many of the guys who have taken my pipe and header advice have found themselves getting better mileage along with the increased performance !

So if you guys want to run noise restriction pipes for no reason then so be it, but I am going to continue educating the racers about what is what and why these pipes are being recommended over the older pipes as it has nothing to do with anything but reducing noise, power and RPM !
Maximo is offline  
Old 02-10-2016 | 05:06 AM
  #8741  
houston's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Three chamber pipes have more return pulse/backpressure
Hsn setting needs to be leaner to gain power from these pipes
Leanerererer settings equates to more better fuel economy
houston is offline  
Old 02-10-2016 | 05:29 AM
  #8742  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by houston
Three chamber pipes have more return pulse/backpressure
Hsn setting needs to be leaner to gain power from these pipes
Leanerererer settings equates to more better fuel economy

They have more backpressure but less return pulse.. the increased back pressure causes a higher tank pressure and subsequent increase in fuel supply which requires a slight leaning of the needles so the mixture inside the engine remains the same even with the leaner needle settings......A 2 chamber recycles the spent fuel better and even with no more airflow passing thru the carb the 2 chamber makes more power hence it uses fuel more efficiently......Both setups doing equal work the 9886 will get better mileage then a 2096

Last edited by Maximo; 02-10-2016 at 05:45 AM.
Maximo is offline  
Old 02-10-2016 | 06:55 AM
  #8743  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 142
From: Greece
Default

Originally Posted by houston
Three chamber pipes have more return pulse/backpressure
Hsn setting needs to be leaner to gain power from these pipes
Leanerererer settings equates to more better fuel economy
leaning a engine i would add ,its good for champions and team drivers that they are only 1 or two per cent ,also leaning an engine would decrease the life span of the engine,.....with all the respect and agreed with maximo and huston i would say that the rules ,,some new rules are killing the adrenaline of rc nitro action ...... so i would prefere to lose a race ...instead of loosing the joy of the 9886 noise ,,the stupid reaction of big venturies even 9 mm venturies .
nick m is offline  
Old 02-10-2016 | 08:25 AM
  #8744  
cczjordan's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,042
From: Malaysia, Sabah
Default

Originally Posted by nick m
leaning a engine i would add ,its good for champions and team drivers that they are only 1 or two per cent ,also leaning an engine would decrease the life span of the engine,.....with all the respect and agreed with maximo and huston i would say that the rules ,,some new rules are killing the adrenaline of rc nitro action ...... so i would prefere to lose a race ...instead of loosing the joy of the 9886 noise ,,the stupid reaction of big venturies even 9 mm venturies .
Leaning for crazy power n extra seconds for sponsored drivers are standard practice but if you willing to spend then just do it. I'm happy with good tune and lasted more gallons...
cczjordan is offline  
Old 02-10-2016 | 08:46 AM
  #8745  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

some rules are silly such as displacement limits.....like seriously does anyone believe a 32 would be a unfair advantage in a pro level offroad race ? .... ultimately the rule prevents the manufacturers from even attempting to develop a higher tech big displacement engine and sadly creating a larger gap between the racers and bashers then there already is...At a time when Nitro really needs some new development more then ever we have these rules that focus on noise restriction..Nitro is at a 10 year low and its still continually losing ground..I can name several areas where rule changes caused a reduction in race attendance , one of them by a simple name change of a class resulting in the catastrophic loss of a common bridge between bashers and racers . Same deal with dynamic adjustable pipes, there is a whole new technology that could be developed that current race rules wont allow due to potential noise issues... Being a former track owner I can say the only noise complaints we had were from our PA system, never from the engines.
Maximo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.