|
Originally Posted by topcat-lll
(Post 7289895)
To me there is a slight lag, but it is at the very very begining of the powerband. I only noticed it from a dead stop. A too lean LSN will cause it
to lose alot of low-end; I found that out this weekend. I'm still testing the pipe. to me the mid low-end on up is way better than 9901. I think I can figure out away to get rid of the lag. I know my mileage is hurting cause I ran out of fuel at about 9 to 10 minutes lucky for me it was right in front of the pit stand, but I was runnig it alittle to rich; the 9901 could do ten minutes with no problem. What clutch spings are you using? The 9853 pipe will not work with the 41021; the low-end will be great, but the mid through top-end just gurggles. |
Hi
What header and pipe would you guys recommend for the Nova based Nitrotec? Been reeding that the Losi pipes are not so good, and I really need an EFRA approved pipe. Thanks guys |
Maybe the 9901SS/41021 header or the new 2084.
|
Originally Posted by houston
(Post 7281857)
it is already properly shimmed for 30% ;)
|
Originally Posted by Dirtdobber
(Post 7293822)
Has this changed in the last year? I bought mine last summer and read all the threads I could find on the FMS. I remember seeing that you would have to add a shim to run 30%. I been running 25% all this time for nothing then.
|
Originally Posted by hambone
(Post 7290064)
Answer clutch and silver 1.0 springs. After a 6 min qual fuel was just below seam in tank. Can't complain abt mileage. My buddy got the exact engine from EB Mods and his has no bottom lag with 9853/41005. Gonna try that pipe and do more testing with RE10 this week. Murnan mods says alot of guys that run his modded fms like the 9901/41021 combo. To the track for pipe testing with Ed Bridges.
over to the 9886 pipe from the 9901 and a 7mm venturi to a 7.5mm I made a slight needle ajustment and ran from there. What I found out today is that you have to completely retune the engine. I mean start with the HSN I ran it up and down my street until it was set. Then the LSN leaned it until I got a constant steady idle (before the idle was blubbery and not constant) I let it idle for about 10 seconds then yank the throttle and it accelerated with out stumbling.(before when I did that the engine would almost die or did die) Well anyway the engine runs like a champ now, the lag is basically gone. I race this Saturday and I will let you know how it went. The 9853/41005 combo sounds interesting, but I would think the two 90 degree bends on the 41005 would hamper the top-end? |
Ok so in the near future I will be running nova +4's in my truggy and buggy...i was wondering has anyone tried it in the truggy with 9853/Long header? that's the setup I was thinking of trying because I've seen a few plus' in truggies and they didn't seem to have that bottom that I'd like. I would still like to have some top obviously for longer jumps on long straights but i want a fair amount of bottom 2
|
Originally Posted by topcat-lll
(Post 7294373)
Did some testing today and what I found was surprising. When I first changed
over to the 9886 pipe from the 9901 and a 7mm venturi to a 7.5mm I made a slight needle ajustment and ran from there. What I found out today is that you have to completely retune the engine. I mean start with the HSN I ran it up and down my street until it was set. Then the LSN leaned it until I got a constant steady idle (before the idle was blubbery and not constant) I let it idle for about 10 seconds then yank the throttle and it accelerated with out stumbling.(before when I did that the engine would almost die or did die) Well anyway the engine runs like a champ now, the lag is basically gone. I race this Saturday and I will let you know how it went. The 9853/41005 combo sounds interesting, but I would think the two 90 degree bends on the 41005 would hamper the top-end? top end pipes will have leaner bottom and richer top balance and opposite for low end based pipes ;) a little tip from your uncle larr' :lol: |
Originally Posted by NitroLuver
(Post 7294418)
Ok so in the near future I will be running nova +4's in my truggy and buggy...i was wondering has anyone tried it in the truggy with 9853/Long header? that's the setup I was thinking of trying because I've seen a few plus' in truggies and they didn't seem to have that bottom that I'd like. I would still like to have some top obviously for longer jumps on long straights but i want a fair amount of bottom 2
|
Originally Posted by houston
(Post 7294432)
9853ss/41021 ;):nod: you will be happy with that setup but i would recommend p5xlt for truggy :D
|
Originally Posted by houston
(Post 7294428)
no it doesnt and yes , every time you change pipesets that have different characteristics a complete retune is in order , i recommend just richening needles at least 1/4 turn on high and low before you go out and run or bench tune .
top end pipes will have leaner bottom and richer top balance and opposite for low end based pipes ;) a little tip from your uncle larr' :lol: Thanks Monty. |
I bought a used toro nero off the bay cheap. The crank, case, carb, head all seem to be in good shape but the P/S/rod is shot. I was wondering if any other p/s will fit in that motor. New toro nero p/s is like 250...I was wonder if a p5 or bf p/s will fit..thanks!
|
Originally Posted by nitronutzzz
(Post 7297780)
I bought a used toro nero off the bay cheap. The crank, case, carb, head all seem to be in good shape but the P/S/rod is shot. I was wondering if any other p/s will fit in that motor. New toro nero p/s is like 250...I was wonder if a p5 or bf p/s will fit..thanks!
|
Were can I get a p/s then? At 250 it would be better to just buy a another toro
|
Originally Posted by Inertia
(Post 7302169)
Were can I get a p/s then? At 250 it would be better to just buy a another toro
|
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 04:00 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.