Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree352Likes

NOVAROSSI Engine thread....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #1786  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by merdith6
You know I'm no idiot. I've been racing rc cars for over 20years, and I've had nitro buggies since 1990. and I'm just saying when i clean and rebuild my x7 with ceramic balls in the bearings that monty did when I spin the crank with my hand before i reinstall the piston and sleeve those bearings are smoother than any other I've touched...


I never said anything about performance gain....but it does feel like a ceramic rear helps the motor spool up faster, but doubt it makes more measurable power.. I have a lot of attention to detail and I can feel very slight changes in my car so take it for what it's worth....maybe I can measure what your dyno can't with my highly tuned sensory input device....
I have no doubt it feels like is spins smoother.. As for a engine spooling faster under load, not likely....Not unless the bearing being replaced created substantial amounts of drag of course....ceramics are smoother in theory, but since these bearings are being run nearly submersed in lubricant I cannot see any noticeable friction differences between steel and ceramic... if the lubricant is doing its job the balls will be riding on a film of oil anyways.... Well thats my story and I am sticking to it !
Maximo is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 11:30 AM
  #1787  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by houston
Its 30 min of running at 36k rpm is what the sheet says they send with the enginee

Laps in the p/s set very well actually , pretty much ready to run when installed


Hope this helps
They spin em at 36K wow ! that must be deafening in the building LOL !
Maximo is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 12:19 PM
  #1788  
Suspended
iTrader: (440)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,180
From: VA
Default

Anyone looking for a near new Novarossi 9853 Super Strong pipe I just listed one for a good price.

http://www.rctech.net/forum/r-c-item...ml#post9909221
MattP is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 12:44 PM
  #1789  
merdith6's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,350
From: Brazoria, TX
Default Ok

Originally Posted by Maximo
I have no doubt it feels like is spins smoother.. As for a engine spooling faster under load, not likely....Not unless the bearing being replaced created substantial amounts of drag of course....ceramics are smoother in theory, but since these bearings are being run nearly submersed in lubricant I cannot see any noticeable friction differences between steel and ceramic... if the lubricant is doing its job the balls will be riding on a film of oil anyways.... Well thats my story and I am sticking to it !
I was commenting on Monty's work. No big deal, I just didn't like my compliment being followed by the comments you made. I think any performance gain from ceramics is due to lighter rotating mass, not smoothness or friction...
merdith6 is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 01:03 PM
  #1790  
Maximo's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by merdith6
I was commenting on Monty's work. No big deal, I just didn't like my compliment being followed by the comments you made. I think any performance gain from ceramics is due to lighter rotating mass, not smoothness or friction...
Understandable.....I didn't intend to offend you if I did so !
Maximo is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 01:10 PM
  #1791  
houston's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by Maximo
They spin em at 36K wow ! that must be deafening in the building LOL !
Thats what the break in sheet says
houston is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 01:11 PM
  #1792  
Ambros303's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 435
Default

Originally Posted by merdith6
I was commenting on Monty's work. No big deal, I just didn't like my compliment being followed by the comments you made. I think any performance gain from ceramics is due to lighter rotating mass, not smoothness or friction...
+1
The main advantage of ceramics is less rotating mass, which means faster spool up and some gain in top end RPM. That is the theory at least. Is it measurable?...idk

They should last longer aswell as the balls wear less then steel. Note i write "should" as ofcourse there are more factors that dictate wear. The balls can't rust either which is a plus aswell.
Ambros303 is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 01:23 PM
  #1793  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,045
From: Holland
Default

4Nice discussion about ceramic bearing. Can someone explain why Novarossi can ask 100 dollar for a main ceramic bearing which will last only 5 liter in the onroad while their 50 dollar priced main steel bearing last longer?

It is not only about the balls but the braces also and there seems to be a weak point with Novarossi.

I wish engine manufacturers would use normal standard size bearings, then there was a wide choice in cheaper and I do think much better bearings.
Roelof is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 07:58 PM
  #1794  
jose valadao's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 106
Default Restricter

What size restricter is better for a track with a long strait away
I am using a 6mm on it but seems to hold back can I get any info on
The best Restricter for this
jose valadao is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 08:07 PM
  #1795  
houston's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by jose valadao
What size restricter is better for a track with a long strait away
I am using a 6mm on it but seems to hold back can I get any info on
The best Restricter for this
I would go with 7mm personally , thats my base starting point
houston is offline  
Old 11-14-2011 | 10:10 PM
  #1796  
Lille-bror's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,792
From: Frederikshavn, Denmark
Default

... or try a 086/9886 with a ultra short header and stick to the 6 mm
Lille-bror is offline  
Old 11-15-2011 | 07:09 AM
  #1797  
houston's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by Lille-bror
... or try a 086/9886 with a ultra short header and stick to the 6 mm
ya , a 9886/41021 setup makes a lot of rpm

6mm makes your engine VERY hard to tune , that is the main reason i would switch if i were you
houston is offline  
Old 11-15-2011 | 12:08 PM
  #1798  
merdith6's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,350
From: Brazoria, TX
Default Yep

Maybe even try a 7.5 on that engine, with a 9886 and try the 41019 or 41001headers..

I've been really impressed with these bent nova headers recently.
merdith6 is offline  
Old 11-15-2011 | 12:21 PM
  #1799  
Lille-bror's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,792
From: Frederikshavn, Denmark
Default

+1 on the 41019 header.

Hard to tune with small venturi? Yearh. Last year I tried 6 mm in a Plus4 at 27º Celsius. I nearly just had to touch the LSN, and the tune was changed. Sensitive? Yep. Great fun? ABSOLUTELY!!!
Lille-bror is offline  
Old 11-15-2011 | 01:02 PM
  #1800  
houston's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by merdith6
Maybe even try a 7.5 on that engine, with a 9886 and try the 41019 or 41001headers..

I've been really impressed with these bent nova headers recently.
those headers dont work quite as well on the 9886 , has what a feels like a lean bog that isnt and cant be tuned out , i have played with lots o combos over and over and over and over and when the 9886 is brand new it works OK but as soon as any buildup starts in the pipe , no bueno
houston is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.