![]() |
Clutch set up in truggy is green and gold spring with dynamite max life shoes. Chris, what do you thing of shark9 in truggy?
|
Originally Posted by Big_one
(Post 9362323)
Clutch set up in truggy is green and gold spring with dynamite max life shoes. Chris, what do you thing of shark9 in truggy?
|
I wasnt to much a fan of the shark in the truggy. lacked bottom end. on a big open track it was great. it reved harder than the b10
Chris will the 2087 pipe give me any advantage over the 2045 pipe on a C6USA? |
Originally Posted by Big_one
(Post 9362323)
Clutch set up in truggy is green and gold spring with dynamite max life shoes. Chris, what do you thing of shark9 in truggy?
|
Originally Posted by TIX
(Post 9364847)
I wasnt to much a fan of the shark in the truggy. lacked bottom end. on a big open track it was great. it reved harder than the b10
Chris will the 2087 pipe give me any advantage over the 2045 pipe on a C6USA? |
Any of you RB engine gurus happen to have a spare C6 turbo
head button, that you could let go of for a decent price ? |
The 2087 is a smoother transition from mid to high but I feel it does make more torque down low than the 2045 makes. I have been running the 2087 on what is basically a C6USA as it's a B10 with a C6USA crank and button. I have been running it in my truggy and it seems to run great and even with a steel flywheel it has plenty of grunt. In the truck I can notice the loss in top speed when compared to the 2045, but it's not too bad.
|
Originally Posted by rageworks
(Post 9365247)
Any of you RB engine gurus happen to have a spare C6 turbo
head button, that you could let go of for a decent price ? |
Originally Posted by Chris Peralta
(Post 9365414)
The 2087 is a smoother transition from mid to high but I feel it does make more torque down low than the 2045 makes. I have been running the 2087 on what is basically a C6USA as it's a B10 with a C6USA crank and button. I have been running it in my truggy and it seems to run great and even with a steel flywheel it has plenty of grunt. In the truck I can notice the loss in top speed when compared to the 2045, but it's not too bad.
|
I too run a Losi truck.... I have tried the 48 and also have a 49 tooth I have tried. With my altitude I really notice the loss in power on the bottom end so I normally end up back with the 50. Plus we are not lucky enough to have a track as big as the nitro pit so it works for me almost everywhere. Next I want to try running this new 2087 pipe with the 204mm header and the 48 tooth spur.
|
Originally Posted by Chris Peralta
(Post 9367245)
I too run a Losi truck.... I have tried the 48 and also have a 49 tooth I have tried. With my altitude I really notice the loss in power on the bottom end so I normally end up back with the 50. Plus we are not lucky enough to have a track as big as the nitro pit so it works for me almost everywhere. Next I want to try running this new 2087 pipe with the 204mm header and the 48 tooth spur.
|
good day, i have a dude.
my old WS9 is dead, y wanted a new RB, i see a killer 10, and X11, this two engien, have more botton end, with my old WS9???? wich one two engine, is more similar to my old ws9 |
Originally Posted by camiloro
(Post 9371602)
good day, i have a dude.
my old WS9 is dead, y wanted a new RB, i see a killer 10, and X11, this two engien, have more botton end, with my old WS9???? wich one two engine, is more similar to my old ws9 The X11 is closer to your WS9. The K10 is more of a sport engine and is not made by Novarossi like the X11 and your WS9. |
The x11 is a 3 port,The Fire 11, 7 port is closer to the WS9.
|
Really loving the c6 l2g in the buggy now massive power!
Rolled over once or twice and cut so I upped the idle but what a beast it is! |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 02:24 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.