2LikesGo-Tech Engines Thread
01-03-2008 | 05:35 PM
#1130
the Go 28 6 port is closer to a MT 28 then a Ninja 28...the Ninja is a short stroke long rod 28...the Go is a long stroke short rod 28........... the Ninja is really a bored out .21...the GO is a typical long stroke 28............................ Guys do not underestimate the Picco/Jammin engines.......I run both Go and Picco engines, and to dismiss the Picco's like your doing is not very accurate on how these motors run.........
THere is no way the Go 28 6 port is going to have the powerband and legs of a NInja 28, the internal geometry is not there ... the GO 28 is identical pretty much to the older MT style 28's, definitely not a new gen 28 sorry to say..... I will gladly have one dynoed if you want to see its powercurve next to a Ninja 28....
I am not knocking the GO 28 either, but the Ninja 28 is an amazing 28 with a killer top end no other 28 I have seen even comes close to........i mean the Ninja is built to rev....
as I say I am not knocking Go engines, as I myself have run Go engines and love them.. But the Ninja 28 is a pretty special .28 with unique internal geometry which allows it to rev higher then a typical 28 design.... I can definitely see the GO 28 6 port being a good matchup to a Jammin 28 as far as powerband and RPM, as they share the same bore/stroke and nearly identical timing profiles...The Ninja on the other hand is quite a bit different then the Jammin or Go..
THere is no way the Go 28 6 port is going to have the powerband and legs of a NInja 28, the internal geometry is not there ... the GO 28 is identical pretty much to the older MT style 28's, definitely not a new gen 28 sorry to say..... I will gladly have one dynoed if you want to see its powercurve next to a Ninja 28....
I am not knocking the GO 28 either, but the Ninja 28 is an amazing 28 with a killer top end no other 28 I have seen even comes close to........i mean the Ninja is built to rev....
as I say I am not knocking Go engines, as I myself have run Go engines and love them.. But the Ninja 28 is a pretty special .28 with unique internal geometry which allows it to rev higher then a typical 28 design.... I can definitely see the GO 28 6 port being a good matchup to a Jammin 28 as far as powerband and RPM, as they share the same bore/stroke and nearly identical timing profiles...The Ninja on the other hand is quite a bit different then the Jammin or Go..
01-03-2008 | 05:48 PM
#1131
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 727
I bouoght my .21 7 port from ebay. It is about $180 including shipping. Best deal by far. it doesn't have serial number on it tho. But, who cares, GO engines' quality is superb. This is my second one. I never have any issues tuning it.
01-03-2008 | 06:28 PM
#1133
Maximo, abouve your stating that a ninja .28 is great and seemingly a GO should be overlooked because a Ninja is so spectacular which I'm sure it may be and then you say you can prove the #s but you post pulls on a .25, that really isn't comparing apples to apples is it?
Oh and someone asked if there were any dyno graphs of some Go engines..so I posted the graphs I could find....
01-03-2008 | 06:28 PM
#1134
Tech Regular
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 328
Because of time issues around the holiday's a few Turbo Go engines were shipped with the Turbo button seperate and not installed, the factory does not make the engines as turbo's so in order for me to offer Turbo versions to customers I purchase extra turbo buttons and build the engines as Turbo's. Turbo versions of the engines do not feature plugs because Go does not currently make a Turbo plug.
01-03-2008 | 06:40 PM
#1135
maximo, i understand your points completley, but we are talking about .28s, the displacement alone could change the graphs on theose pulls. i was just thinking, that if you wanted to compare a ninja .28 and a GO .28 why show a GO .25 VS a ninja .28 i was really anticipating you posting the results of those two not a .25 GO and Ninja .28 thats what i was refering to when i quoted your first statment.
01-03-2008 | 06:47 PM
#1136
Tech Regular
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 328
Mugen, Maximo hasn't had the chance to run a .28 yet thats all, so the only comparison graph he has was a modded .25 he did to a stock Ninja.
One thing that you are forgetting Maximo when you compare timming and porting and stroke with the Go engines is the piston. The pistons are very slick because of the material used, and that is one reason why i believe the .21 show such great performance on or off the dyno.
Maximo do you know how many ports are in a Picco, that is another cost contributing factor in the engines as well, the more ports the more cost.
One thing that you are forgetting Maximo when you compare timming and porting and stroke with the Go engines is the piston. The pistons are very slick because of the material used, and that is one reason why i believe the .21 show such great performance on or off the dyno.
Maximo do you know how many ports are in a Picco, that is another cost contributing factor in the engines as well, the more ports the more cost.
01-03-2008 | 06:50 PM
#1137
maximo, i understand your points completley, but we are talking about .28s, the displacement alone could change the graphs on theose pulls. i was just thinking, that if you wanted to compare a ninja .28 and a GO .28 why show a GO .25 VS a ninja .28 i was really anticipating you posting the results of those two not a .25 GO and Ninja .28 thats what i was refering to when i quoted your first statment.
Anyways personally i am done running anything bigger then a modded .21, as I find the modded .28's too powerful to clutch properly, even the .21's are chewing the clutches faster then I would like....
01-03-2008 | 06:56 PM
#1138
Mugen, Maximo hasn't had the chance to run a .28 yet thats all, so the only comparison graph he has was a modded .25 he did to a stock Ninja.
One thing that you are forgetting Maximo when you compare timming and porting and stroke with the Go engines is the piston. The pistons are very slick because of the material used, and that is one reason why i believe the .21 show such great performance on or off the dyno.
Maximo do you know how many ports are in a Picco, that is another cost contributing factor in the engines as well, the more ports the more cost.
One thing that you are forgetting Maximo when you compare timming and porting and stroke with the Go engines is the piston. The pistons are very slick because of the material used, and that is one reason why i believe the .21 show such great performance on or off the dyno.
Maximo do you know how many ports are in a Picco, that is another cost contributing factor in the engines as well, the more ports the more cost.
