Serpent 710
#5507
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,295
From: Chicago Illinois USA
Originally posted by BaxterC
sweet, thanks guys, tell me, the digital servos are programmable, but how does one program a digital servo, I dont neccesarily wan to buy a programmer. Also what would you suggest, fast or torque for steering? Also, anyone seen the MG ZS from protoform in action yet?
sweet, thanks guys, tell me, the digital servos are programmable, but how does one program a digital servo, I dont neccesarily wan to buy a programmer. Also what would you suggest, fast or torque for steering? Also, anyone seen the MG ZS from protoform in action yet?
I always use the same brand servo matching the radio....for digital, use S9451...very good speed and torque.
If you want something lighter, I knew someone used the S9550 for both throttle and steering....they are like 25gram lighter then standard servo (cause they are shorter) but 83 oz/in @ 6V torque spec, I am not sure it is strong enough for steering......S9451 run .10 Sec/60 Degrees @ 6V and 121 oz/in @ 6V spec.
#5508
Hi Guys,
What rear end width are you all running? With my still suspensionless 710, if I set my rear width to 199m or more, then the DRS arm starts to catch the centax gear - I suppose this won't happen once I get my shocks on. Anyone had any problems here?
I saw a post on the mytsn 710 forums about this and I thought it would be the rear width, as when I built my car the suspension wouldn't move, as I had the rear far too narrow. Only once I turned the pivot-balls out a bit would the suspension move up; the more I turn them out, the more upward movement in the rear suspension.
Cheers, Mark.
What rear end width are you all running? With my still suspensionless 710, if I set my rear width to 199m or more, then the DRS arm starts to catch the centax gear - I suppose this won't happen once I get my shocks on. Anyone had any problems here?
I saw a post on the mytsn 710 forums about this and I thought it would be the rear width, as when I built my car the suspension wouldn't move, as I had the rear far too narrow. Only once I turned the pivot-balls out a bit would the suspension move up; the more I turn them out, the more upward movement in the rear suspension.
Cheers, Mark.
#5509
There has been some talk about the rear pivot balls coming out, as they are a little too short and that it would be better to use the older, longer steel pivot balls until serpent comes out with some newer ones.
Well, why not screw the pivot balls in further and then use wheel spacers to correct the width back to 200mm? Is there something I've missed here?
Cheers, Mark.
Well, why not screw the pivot balls in further and then use wheel spacers to correct the width back to 200mm? Is there something I've missed here?
Cheers, Mark.
#5510
Originally posted by markp27
Hi Guys,
What rear end width are you all running? With my still suspensionless 710, if I set my rear width to 199m or more, then the DRS arm starts to catch the centax gear - I suppose this won't happen once I get my shocks on. Anyone had any problems here?
I saw a post on the mytsn 710 forums about this and I thought it would be the rear width, as when I built my car the suspension wouldn't move, as I had the rear far too narrow. Only once I turned the pivot-balls out a bit would the suspension move up; the more I turn them out, the more upward movement in the rear suspension.
Cheers, Mark.
Hi Guys,
What rear end width are you all running? With my still suspensionless 710, if I set my rear width to 199m or more, then the DRS arm starts to catch the centax gear - I suppose this won't happen once I get my shocks on. Anyone had any problems here?
I saw a post on the mytsn 710 forums about this and I thought it would be the rear width, as when I built my car the suspension wouldn't move, as I had the rear far too narrow. Only once I turned the pivot-balls out a bit would the suspension move up; the more I turn them out, the more upward movement in the rear suspension.
Cheers, Mark.
#5511
Originally posted by Thaasman
If you push the car down with your hand it slightly touches the DRS arm, but don't worry this won't happen when you'r driving.....
If you push the car down with your hand it slightly touches the DRS arm, but don't worry this won't happen when you'r driving.....
just checked my track width setting for left and right and they weren't equal
now I've set left and right to 100mm no rubbing even without the shocks on
#5512
Originally posted by markp27
There has been some talk about the rear pivot balls coming out, as they are a little too short and that it would be better to use the older, longer steel pivot balls until serpent comes out with some newer ones.
Well, why not screw the pivot balls in further and then use wheel spacers to correct the width back to 200mm? Is there something I've missed here?
Cheers, Mark.
There has been some talk about the rear pivot balls coming out, as they are a little too short and that it would be better to use the older, longer steel pivot balls until serpent comes out with some newer ones.
Well, why not screw the pivot balls in further and then use wheel spacers to correct the width back to 200mm? Is there something I've missed here?
Cheers, Mark.
Personally I haven't stripped a ball yet, but I race on grass infield tracks not boards.
Julius
#5513
Originally posted by Julius
Well, as you've stated yourself, if the trackwidth is too narrow you'll limit the suspension travel (less upward travel due to the driveshafts bottoming out). So you'll need to set it as close to 200mm as possible.
Personally I haven't stripped a ball yet, but I race on grass infield tracks not boards.
Julius
Well, as you've stated yourself, if the trackwidth is too narrow you'll limit the suspension travel (less upward travel due to the driveshafts bottoming out). So you'll need to set it as close to 200mm as possible.
Personally I haven't stripped a ball yet, but I race on grass infield tracks not boards.
Julius
Last year my 705's throttle stuck on at this point!
That cost me a few new parts!
Thanks for the info, Julius.
#5514
Originally posted by Julius
Personally I haven't stripped a ball yet, but I race on grass infield tracks not boards.
Julius
Personally I haven't stripped a ball yet, but I race on grass infield tracks not boards.
Julius
Picard, I have also done some very silly things when making adjustments... try running a front and a rear spring on the front shocks, and your rear shocks in different upper holes. oh, I have ordered the white springs...
(and a diff for the front)
#5516
Originally posted by Proficar403
Does anyone know anyplace that has the novamega 2106 motor in stock?
Does anyone know anyplace that has the novamega 2106 motor in stock?
www.atomichobbies.com
Speak to Anthony or Phill (owners), great prices and service, Tell them the Peruvian guys send you.
AFM
#5517
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,219
From: TEXAS. USA
Raced the car twice now and the only problem I'm having with the car is upper and lower bumper plates cracking/breaking.
Hitting the walls/boards full tilt will prolly do this!
Haven't had a problem with the piviot balls.............
Hitting the walls/boards full tilt will prolly do this!
Haven't had a problem with the piviot balls.............
#5519
Hey mate
Yeah, dandys boards are just that, but I like the idea of you make a mistake you pay the price. Having said that it is tough on guys running for the first time at the track. I went down yesterday and sorted all my problems, (mainly rear Toe in), car was flying. I though you were going to try the solid diff first mate?
That didn't take long to order the front diff, interesting to see how it goes at dandy, I think i will prefer the solid, but only time will tell
Yeah, dandys boards are just that, but I like the idea of you make a mistake you pay the price. Having said that it is tough on guys running for the first time at the track. I went down yesterday and sorted all my problems, (mainly rear Toe in), car was flying. I though you were going to try the solid diff first mate?
That didn't take long to order the front diff, interesting to see how it goes at dandy, I think i will prefer the solid, but only time will tell
Originally posted by sparksy
Me either. However, radiotray, rear tower, brake plate, front upper and lower bumper have all broken and I have pulled a pivot ball from the hub, not the arm. Damn you Picard... dandy's boards are a biatch.
Picard, I have also done some very silly things when making adjustments... try running a front and a rear spring on the front shocks, and your rear shocks in different upper holes. oh, I have ordered the white springs...
(and a diff for the front)
Me either. However, radiotray, rear tower, brake plate, front upper and lower bumper have all broken and I have pulled a pivot ball from the hub, not the arm. Damn you Picard... dandy's boards are a biatch.
Picard, I have also done some very silly things when making adjustments... try running a front and a rear spring on the front shocks, and your rear shocks in different upper holes. oh, I have ordered the white springs...
(and a diff for the front)
#5520
Originally posted by BaxterC
Hey guys... just looking for advice, I have been looking for a decent servo, and hove found a couple, some people say I should put in a digital, some say no as it has a higher current draw on the receiver pack. Does anyone have a suggestion, I have a KO Propo receiver and radio, I have standard servos, (Futaba S3003)
I am wondering what you all are using, I want to know, fast for steering, or torque for steering?
Hey guys... just looking for advice, I have been looking for a decent servo, and hove found a couple, some people say I should put in a digital, some say no as it has a higher current draw on the receiver pack. Does anyone have a suggestion, I have a KO Propo receiver and radio, I have standard servos, (Futaba S3003)
I am wondering what you all are using, I want to know, fast for steering, or torque for steering?
That said, yes it is true that digital servos draw more current due to the constant feedback for more accurate position. Holding power and accuracy is better with digital servos but the newer analog ones are also good.
For throttle, you may want to get more torque depending on your driving style or track layout which probably needs a lot of late braking. Also for throttle / brake, because of the type of load, most opt for analog.
Therefore a lot of people strike a balance by putting digital servo on the steering and analog servo for throttle / brake. This would also give a balance in terms of receiver pack current draw.
I would use KO-2343 / KO-2143 / Futaba S9451 digital servo for steering and KO-2344 / KO-2144 / Sanwa VB analog servos for throttle / brake.
I'm assuming that you're using the older KO Propo Tx/Rx (not the Helios) which does not have the option to run HRS mode. If you have this, then you may have to go with full digital servos for steering and throttle / brake.
Else like Julius or some team drivers in Holland use good analog Sanwa servos. That would give you the best runtime.
Just my 2 cents.



