16LikesHPI Vorza Flux 1/8 E-Buggy Thread
09-19-2011, 05:22 PM
#6378
09-20-2011, 12:06 PM
#6381
Tech Rookie
Hello,
i have a question for the 112 mm shock tower, because my Vorza is landing hard on the chassis on our track. What do you think...can you recommend this or will the buggy fast overturn.
Greetings from Germany
Harry
i have a question for the 112 mm shock tower, because my Vorza is landing hard on the chassis on our track. What do you think...can you recommend this or will the buggy fast overturn.
Greetings from Germany
Harry
09-20-2011, 02:30 PM
#6383
The motor mount for the Torq is fairly propriatary. However I shoehorned a Tekin 2050 / TT2311 into it. The 2050 is exact same size as the 2650 just less kv. The motot mount hing bar most towards the front of the vehicle will have to be sort of bent forwards towards the front of the vehicle. The cooling fin pattern is wider on the Tekin than on the Torq. NOt taller. Wider along the length of the motor. You will see what I mean when you put it in. Its doable. A bit of a rubiks cube. But doable. Just play with it. Should not have to dremmel anything. Just a slight forward push of the forward hinge.
sorry too many qs before spending another threes for a esc and motor combo.
09-20-2011, 06:24 PM
#6384
You will certainly get more travel with the 112mm shocks and tower...but if you are bottoming out on the chassis I would first upgrade my rear pistons to 1.2 instead of the stock 1.3. The increase in pack will help the bottoming out considerably with or without the 112s. If you still want the increased travel then the 112s will get you that.
I run the 112s with 1.2 in the rear with good results.
09-20-2011, 11:21 PM
#6385
Tech Rookie
Welcome to the Vorza thread Harry!
You will certainly get more travel with the 112mm shocks and tower...but if you are bottoming out on the chassis I would first upgrade my rear pistons to 1.2 instead of the stock 1.3. The increase in pack will help the bottoming out considerably with or without the 112s. If you still want the increased travel then the 112s will get you that.
I run the 112s with 1.2 in the rear with good results.
You will certainly get more travel with the 112mm shocks and tower...but if you are bottoming out on the chassis I would first upgrade my rear pistons to 1.2 instead of the stock 1.3. The increase in pack will help the bottoming out considerably with or without the 112s. If you still want the increased travel then the 112s will get you that.
I run the 112s with 1.2 in the rear with good results.
09-21-2011, 12:08 AM
#6386
http://rcshox.com/shoxshop/catalog/p...products_id=39
09-21-2011, 10:43 AM
#6388
09-21-2011, 12:32 PM
#6390
Well they priced the Vorsa MSRP 1000$ and most sell them at 600 or so... So maybe take 400 off the original price? I don't think I can afford another car. If I sold my MERV which I won't cause I like the small size i would get the bigger E Revo... together with the Vorza would be sweet! Or maybe the Trophy Truggy Flux? Hmmmm!