R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Offroad Nitro Engine Forum (https://www.rctech.net/forum/offroad-nitro-engine-forum-157/)
-   -   NOVAROSSI Engine thread.... (https://www.rctech.net/forum/offroad-nitro-engine-forum/353301-novarossi-engine-thread.html)

Maximo 06-13-2016 06:57 AM


Originally Posted by bash bros (Post 14564350)
Werks 2058 works great with the p5 based engines, really good top end plus it's very smooth throughout the low to mid rpm range with plenty of useable power. Currently running it in my buggy and I'd say it's a pretty solid combo.

As far as Nova pipes 9886 with either 41032 or 41001 will make some stupid power especially with a modded engine.


If you stick with a stock mill and really want it to scream pop one of the shims out after it's broken in. Even dropping the shimstack down from .8mm to .7mm makes a huge difference with a good 30% race fuel


On the stock Elite 5 you can remove the 0.2 mm shim and it should still run nicely and make a huge gain in power with the added benefit that when the engine starts to lose its piston fit it will maintain its idle better.....May lose a little bit of mileage but the power increase will be off the charts...by comparison to a OS these Novarossi have much more conservative head clearances OS run 0.4 mm and these Nova's are 0.6 mm , this makes a huge difference in how they act and how strongly they perform and how wide the tuning window becomes...Higher compression engines tend to come up onto power easier with a richer needle setting which IMO makes them a little more forgiving to tune...

my pipe recommendations 9853/41033 9886/41001 2096/41033 9901/41001 9901/41033 and if you get onto a bigger track or want to do speed runs and looking for the absolute best top end and peak power then try a 9886/41032 .. you will lose some of your low speed trigger power but the engine will scream like a monster when you open up the trigger....

skrichter 06-13-2016 10:32 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Maximo (Post 14565098)
On the stock Elite 5 you can remove the 0.2 mm shim and it should still run nicely and make a huge gain in power with the added benefit that when the engine starts to lose its piston fit it will maintain its idle better.....May lose a little bit of mileage but the power increase will be off the charts...by comparison to a OS these Novarossi have much more conservative head clearances OS run 0.4 mm and these Nova's are 0.6 mm , this makes a huge difference in how they act and how strongly they perform and how wide the tuning window becomes...Higher compression engines tend to come up onto power easier with a richer needle setting which IMO makes them a little more forgiving to tune...

my pipe recommendations 9853/41033 9886/41001 2096/41033 9901/41001 9901/41033 and if you get onto a bigger track or want to do speed runs and looking for the absolute best top end and peak power then try a 9886/41032 .. you will lose some of your low speed trigger power but the engine will scream like a monster when you open up the trigger....

Maximo is truly an asset to the nitro community! Thank you!

Interesting that Drake's engine only has 0.5mm head clearance. So he must have been looking for some power (which I think is similar to the Elite 5).

Maximo 06-13-2016 10:44 AM


Originally Posted by skrichter (Post 14565375)
Maximo is truly an asset to the nitro community! Thank you!

Interesting that Drake's engine only has 0.5mm head clearance. So he must have been looking for some power (which I think is similar to the Elite 5).



nope Drakes engine is standard Novarossi shimming ..its actually a RB BX engine brought back to life with the oversize RB connecting rod and all.........

edit ...You are right the shim stack is different but the head clearances are standard stock Nova

bash bros 06-13-2016 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by Maximo (Post 14565098)
On the stock Elite 5 you can remove the 0.2 mm shim and it should still run nicely and make a huge gain in power with the added benefit that when the engine starts to lose its piston fit it will maintain its idle better.....May lose a little bit of mileage but the power increase will be off the charts...by comparison to a OS these Novarossi have much more conservative head clearances OS run 0.4 mm and these Nova's are 0.6 mm , this makes a huge difference in how they act and how strongly they perform and how wide the tuning window becomes...Higher compression engines tend to come up onto power easier with a richer needle setting which IMO makes them a little more forgiving to tune...

So then is head clearance why some of these guys get away with running tiny carb inserts on the OS engines? It seems like the Novas prefer larger inserts compared to OS and a lot of other engines.

Interesting find on the Drake engine too... kinda curious what he does shim-wise on his other engines.

Maximo 06-13-2016 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by bash bros (Post 14565408)
So then is head clearance why some of these guys get away with running tiny carb inserts on the OS engines? It seems like the Novas prefer larger inserts compared to OS and a lot of other engines.

Interesting find on the Drake engine too... kinda curious what he does shim-wise on his other engines.

They all lose power the same way from the small inserts, just the OS has more power to begin with so the loss isn't noticed as much... actually many Speed owners have never seen their engines full potential as most have them choked back pretty good...

Roelof 06-13-2016 12:10 PM


Originally Posted by Maximo (Post 14565388)
nope Drakes engine is standard Novarossi shimming ..its actually a RB BX engine brought back to life with the oversize RB connecting rod and all.........

So all those RB guys in search for a rod need to get a Drake rod?

Maximo 06-13-2016 12:17 PM


Originally Posted by Roelof (Post 14565482)
So all those RB guys in search for a rod need to get a Drake rod?


Yes !!!!!

skrichter 06-13-2016 01:31 PM

delete

cczjordan 06-14-2016 07:00 AM


Originally Posted by cczjordan (Post 14564803)
Anyone owned bonito, keep off 7 and mito? What is the difference, the older model is quite cheap to ignore

Can anyone give opinion on this?

HaulinBass 06-14-2016 07:05 AM

I have a keep off 7xls but only have one race weekend on it. Seems to be a decent motor

Jerm13 06-14-2016 10:26 AM


Originally Posted by cczjordan (Post 14566675)
Can anyone give opinion on this?

I had a Bonito in my truck. It is a beast. Almost too much motor for small to medium size tracks sometimes. It has a good linear power band and never runs out of legs. I think the RPM limit is around 43K which is awesome if you have a large track, long straights or spend a lot of time in the mid to upper RPM range. It now sits as my trusty back up unless I got to one specific track.


The Keep Off is really close to the Bonito. A little softer on the bottom, but more mid to top (slow to start but the power curve is almost vertical when she gets going), but it maxes out RPM wise a little sooner. I had it before my Bonito.


Haven't used the Mito. Don't really have any plans too either. Not that its a bad motor, I just have 4 sitting and don't need another one:D

cczjordan 06-14-2016 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by Jerm13 (Post 14566975)
I had a Bonito in my truck. It is a beast. Almost too much motor for small to medium size tracks sometimes. It has a good linear power band and never runs out of legs. I think the RPM limit is around 43K which is awesome if you have a large track, long straights or spend a lot of time in the mid to upper RPM range. It now sits as my trusty back up unless I got to one specific track.


The Keep Off is really close to the Bonito. A little softer on the bottom, but more mid to top (slow to start but the power curve is almost vertical when she gets going), but it maxes out RPM wise a little sooner. I had it before my Bonito.


Haven't used the Mito. Don't really have any plans too either. Not that its a bad motor, I just have 4 sitting and don't need another one:D

Thanks, I'll get the keep off then for buggy use

travertini 06-16-2016 07:25 PM

Anyone know off hand the rear bearing size of the lucky 7 motor ?

Neesh 06-16-2016 07:33 PM

Was awhile back when I replaced mine but pretty sure it was the standard Nova 14x25.8x6

cczjordan 06-18-2016 03:06 AM

Tested my keep off today, felt very soft on bottom but power delivery is very linear... Doesn't feel the pop of my paloma so i think is a more buggy engine


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 02:36 AM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.