RB Concept Engine Thread..
#2747
#2748
I run a 9886/41021 when i need more bottom and an ofna 086 which has a short dbl bend manifold for more topend in truggy. But it's a clockwork modded engine that has had the sleeve dropped down to deal with the stockers excessive exhaust timing. It's one of my favorite engines. The stock engine suffers from a soft bottom end just like Chris eluded to.
#2752
Tech Adept
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 126
From: New Zealand
I run a 9886/41021 when i need more bottom and an ofna 086 which has a short dbl bend manifold for more topend in truggy. But it's a clockwork modded engine that has had the sleeve dropped down to deal with the stockers excessive exhaust timing. It's one of my favorite engines. The stock engine suffers from a soft bottom end just like Chris eluded to.
#2753
My F11 was too much bottom end for me in a buggy, it felt perfect to me in truggy!! Altho it just doesn't make the same awesome power my trusty old C6USA does so I stick to the USA for truck. I think a lot of guys run on really high bite tracks with a truggy and they need more bottom end.
#2755
#2756
#2757
I ran the 192 header on it for both car and truck. Never did try a 198 as I never felt I needed any extra bottom end. I did also try one of the Tecnopower pipes on the F11 and that ran awesome as well!! Very similar to the 2045 and it had the same shape/length header as the RB (192)
#2758
I ran the 192 header on it for both car and truck. Never did try a 198 as I never felt I needed any extra bottom end. I did also try one of the Tecnopower pipes on the F11 and that ran awesome as well!! Very similar to the 2045 and it had the same shape/length header as the RB (192)
#2760
Thats the TP pipe I did try and liked!! I have never ran a 2057 but I think it's an older pipe design. I know the 2058 works well but not sure how the 2057 compares to it. I would say between the 2045 and TP pipe you would be good to go!!



2Likes