Serpent 710
Originally posted by PUNISHER
The 710 has a pretty much tall gear ratio then other nitro cars so you may want to try the stock gearing at first then go from there. Also what motor you are running will make a factor on gear ratio to go with.
The 710 has a pretty much tall gear ratio then other nitro cars so you may want to try the stock gearing at first then go from there. Also what motor you are running will make a factor on gear ratio to go with.
How high the engine can rev coupled to the pipe would determine gearing for me. If my engine could rev very high, I would gear down (use bigger spurs and smaller pinions for 1st and 2nd gear) to take advantage of the high revving engine. If your engine has a lot of torque and it's more bottom end, you might want to gear taller to take advantage of the extra torque the engine / pipe can produce as well as make up for lack of high end speed at the back of the 180 ft straight. That's the general rule. But how much you should gear down or up would depend on the track at the end of the day.
That said, ideal top speed (which depends on gearing) also heavily depends on the tire diameter that you use (overall tire rollout) assuming you use foam tires...
Originally posted by Pyramid
Hi, I have not tried the one set screw and yes it is the flyweights that I cut, not the shoes.
Hi, I have not tried the one set screw and yes it is the flyweights that I cut, not the shoes.
And I thought that if you hang and pivot the flyweight (with set screw at the end) as per the manual on the flywheel pole, the axial force / pressure coming from the flyweight is always coming more from the edge of the flyweights as oppose to axial force / pressure coming direct from the complete flyweight piece when you install them in between the post.
Originally posted by AMGRacer
D there is an article on myTSN which details Novarossi glow plugs and the difference between standard, gold and special glow plugs. You have any links for it?
D there is an article on myTSN which details Novarossi glow plugs and the difference between standard, gold and special glow plugs. You have any links for it?
Anyway, I believe a copy of that has been put into the 710 FAQ. Download it and check it out. Page 20.
Originally posted by InitialD
Damn. I think that guy who wrote that article (Rob Kuijper) left for Kyosho and took all the articles with him !
Anyway, I believe a copy of that has been put into the 710 FAQ. Download it and check it out. Page 20.
Damn. I think that guy who wrote that article (Rob Kuijper) left for Kyosho and took all the articles with him !
Anyway, I believe a copy of that has been put into the 710 FAQ. Download it and check it out. Page 20.
Originally posted by AMGRacer
OK got it thanks. I am going to run a 45 minute final soon and I was wondering which plugs had the iridium in them to help against vibrations. Got my answer.
OK got it thanks. I am going to run a 45 minute final soon and I was wondering which plugs had the iridium in them to help against vibrations. Got my answer.
Originally posted by InitialD
Just curious. What has iridium got to do with vibrations?
Just curious. What has iridium got to do with vibrations?
They are designated #5S rather than #5 or #5G.
Originally posted by rodrigo1508
What do I need to do to fit a lola body in this car?
What do I need to do to fit a lola body in this car?
Originally posted by rodrigo1508
What do I need to do to fit a lola body in this car?
What do I need to do to fit a lola body in this car?
802202 Shock tower front Lola
802208 Lola bumper plate
802209 Lola bumper
Out of the above, only the front shock tower has come out. The rest is still not out yet. Don't know when.
At the mean time, if you do not want to get the front shock tower for the Lola, you could cut out holes on the front part of the Lola shell to let the existing stock CF shock towers protrude out. You may need to trim the existing foam bumper shorter so that they fit under the body correctly if you do not want to get the Impact / 705 Lola bumper like what Pyramid has suggested.
If you have the Frewer version of the Loletta body, then you do not need to cut any holes for the shock towers. They fit fine because the front part of the Loletta shell is higher.
D,
I didn't compare the KO 2343 and 2344 for myself.
I asked Josh Cyrul about it, and this is what he said.
PSI Racing - I prefer the higher torque in my gas cars. I used to always choose the speed for the steering but after I tested a few different servos I then opted for the high torque as I liked the feel - less twitchy off center but it did seem to have more steering in the higher speed (higher load) corners. I'm not sure what Ralph uses...
I didn't compare the KO 2343 and 2344 for myself.
I asked Josh Cyrul about it, and this is what he said.
PSI Racing - I prefer the higher torque in my gas cars. I used to always choose the speed for the steering but after I tested a few different servos I then opted for the high torque as I liked the feel - less twitchy off center but it did seem to have more steering in the higher speed (higher load) corners. I'm not sure what Ralph uses...
Originally posted by Ah10
If you are expecting on by Xmas then I would suggest you to plat a hold on it since the trend kind of go this way:
Assuming from the previous example from the company
710 R coming out in 3 months
715 will be introduced in 4 1/2 months
715R coming out as a hop up version in 6 months
710 has been announced discontinue.
725 probably coming out by then!
So if you are expecting to get one by Xmas then you might not be able to find any parts since 725 is already on the way to hit the shore!
If you are expecting on by Xmas then I would suggest you to plat a hold on it since the trend kind of go this way:
Assuming from the previous example from the company
710 R coming out in 3 months
715 will be introduced in 4 1/2 months
715R coming out as a hop up version in 6 months
710 has been announced discontinue.
725 probably coming out by then!
So if you are expecting to get one by Xmas then you might not be able to find any parts since 725 is already on the way to hit the shore!
Originally posted by FW05R
We should have all have driven our 715Rs to death by now and be eagerly awaiting the new 725 and reminising over the discontinuation of the original 710
Has anybody seen Brandon McNally's setup yet at mytsn?
Interesting that he used front solid axle. Looking at the setup with 45 degree front sway bar, the rear roll center, softer rear tire, it seems they were looking for rear traction and does not seem they need a lot of off power steering on the track. I may be wrong.
Comments on the engine performance were "Very good Clutch set-up black weights non pivot with 3 holes 2.5mm 1/8 spring with black shoe." That would mean the flyweights mounted in between the flywheel poles, black shoe, the harder Centax II spring. But not too sure what "3 holes 2.5 mm means"... Does it mean 3 holes with 2.5 mm diameter were drilled per flyweight or each flyweight already had a hole (stock flyweight has one 2.5 mm diameter hole to pivot on the flywheel pole if I'm not mistaken)?
Interesting that he used front solid axle. Looking at the setup with 45 degree front sway bar, the rear roll center, softer rear tire, it seems they were looking for rear traction and does not seem they need a lot of off power steering on the track. I may be wrong.
Comments on the engine performance were "Very good Clutch set-up black weights non pivot with 3 holes 2.5mm 1/8 spring with black shoe." That would mean the flyweights mounted in between the flywheel poles, black shoe, the harder Centax II spring. But not too sure what "3 holes 2.5 mm means"... Does it mean 3 holes with 2.5 mm diameter were drilled per flyweight or each flyweight already had a hole (stock flyweight has one 2.5 mm diameter hole to pivot on the flywheel pole if I'm not mistaken)?
Originally posted by InitialD
Has anybody seen Brandon McNally's setup yet at mytsn?
Interesting that he used front solid axle. Looking at the setup with 45 degree front sway bar, the rear roll center, softer rear tire, it seems they were looking for rear traction and does not seem they need a lot of off power steering on the track. I may be wrong.
Comments on the engine performance were "Very good Clutch set-up black weights non pivot with 3 holes 2.5mm 1/8 spring with black shoe." That would mean the flyweights mounted in between the flywheel poles, black shoe, the harder Centax II spring. But not too sure what "3 holes 2.5 mm means"... Does it mean 3 holes with 2.5 mm diameter were drilled per flyweight or each flyweight already had a hole (stock flyweight has one 2.5 mm diameter hole to pivot on the flywheel pole if I'm not mistaken)?
Has anybody seen Brandon McNally's setup yet at mytsn?
Interesting that he used front solid axle. Looking at the setup with 45 degree front sway bar, the rear roll center, softer rear tire, it seems they were looking for rear traction and does not seem they need a lot of off power steering on the track. I may be wrong.
Comments on the engine performance were "Very good Clutch set-up black weights non pivot with 3 holes 2.5mm 1/8 spring with black shoe." That would mean the flyweights mounted in between the flywheel poles, black shoe, the harder Centax II spring. But not too sure what "3 holes 2.5 mm means"... Does it mean 3 holes with 2.5 mm diameter were drilled per flyweight or each flyweight already had a hole (stock flyweight has one 2.5 mm diameter hole to pivot on the flywheel pole if I'm not mistaken)?
Strangely enough the racer is marked as Art Carbonell



