MTX 5
#2971
There is no real visible difference between the two. Just small changes for strength in the upper rear bulkheads rear camber bridge steel diff gears, diff cases and the number on the box. I have the original kit and it works for me. Key tips, clutch build, gear alignment and mesh, and some type of brace. By the way I am trying to find a 4 mm chassis and all I see is the high traction chassis from mugen which I have, the Arena which is 3.3 and cso which is 3.2. Anyone tried these other chassis? I'm not completely satisfied with the high traction chassis even though it's better than the original.
#2972
Tech Fanatic
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 768
hi nitto at nsw titles the car next to us ran a nack chassi //futarbo pro we ran an evo and it bent just like /mugen from the brace back but I bent back we tried arena I think but non are any better than the kit on witch is not mutch good if you hit anything
greg
greg
#2978
Tech Adept
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 144
From: Athens Greece
#2980
Greg, all chassis will bend, we found the Knack chassis stronger than either of the two Mugen chassis. Mainly because it's stronger between the engine and rear bulkhead supports, it has a slightly larger profile making it a little stiffer with only 3gr weight penalty. This is the second Knack chassis we have used with the first only changed because we were running in the Nationals not because it was bent. I would recommend this chassis as an excellent option to either of the Mugen chassis.
#2985
I can't dispute the fact that the X is a great car that works, and I get that point, but I'm not ready to throw in the towel just yet. When I do, the X is the obvious choice especially knowing that u guys have great deals at Fordam Hobbies.!!


