Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Associated TC6 Thread >

Team Associated TC6 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree20Likes

Team Associated TC6 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2011, 02:45 AM
  #2311  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 586
Default

oops missed that on the notes, forward placement.
jorgesimes is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 05:00 AM
  #2312  
Tech Regular
 
JRXS_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 386
Default

Jorge how did the car feel with quite a high roll centre?
JRXS_chris is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 07:17 AM
  #2313  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 586
Default

actually they are very low, but i think it could be a specific thing to our tracks, that are huge and flowing tracks, with not that much grip. Although almost every cars on the market that i know have the same arm position or distance to the chassi that A3 gives on TC6. It's kind more of a feeling to you, for me and on that specific track and conditions it worked, so try it out.
jorgesimes is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 10:22 AM
  #2314  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
roger999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 844
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Recommended drive ratio for 10.5? 5.2 - 6.4 is ok? don't really know what pinions to buy?
roger999 is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 01:33 PM
  #2315  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 339
Default

.
Fastfreddy74 is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 01:55 PM
  #2316  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
CristianTabush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,165
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jorgesimes
actually they are very low, but i think it could be a specific thing to our tracks, that are huge and flowing tracks, with not that much grip. Although almost every cars on the market that i know have the same arm position or distance to the chassi that A3 gives on TC6. It's kind more of a feeling to you, for me and on that specific track and conditions it worked, so try it out.
Our track is high grip and technical asphalt. We all have gone to the A3 roll center. The biggest advantage of this roll center is that the arms do not get loose during a run, because these are the shortest blocks, so there is much less leverage on them. We have also used this roll center with a lot of success on high grip carpet and low grip asphalt.

Originally Posted by roger999
Recommended drive ratio for 10.5? 5.2 - 6.4 is ok? don't really know what pinions to buy?
Boost or no boost? This should be good for non-boosted settings. Depending on the length of your straightaway.
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 02:13 PM
  #2317  
Tech Regular
 
JRXS_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 386
Default

I'm running b0 as that's what's on all the setups I've seen. Is a3 very similar then?
JRXS_chris is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 02:18 PM
  #2318  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 339
Default

Originally Posted by JRXS_chris
I'm running b0 as that's what's on all the setups I've seen. Is a3 very similar then?
It should be about 1mm lower
Fastfreddy74 is offline  
Old 04-23-2011, 02:32 PM
  #2319  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
CristianTabush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,165
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Yes, it is actually closer to 1.5mm lower. Personally, we liked the A3 position more. Yes, many of the AE guys run the B0, but the car is not as consistent because the arms get the loosest with the 0 blocks. You can get very close to the B0 roll center by raising the outside camber link by 2 mm to a total of 4mm on the outside or you can start using shorter links to increase your roll stiffness to something similar. We are working on a solution for the blocks to not move over at Reflex. Maybe then, the B0 will be a good option, but as long as they get that loose, I would recommend to stay away from them. They will not hold up properly for a complete run.

Last edited by CristianTabush; 04-24-2011 at 03:51 PM. Reason: typo
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 02:00 AM
  #2320  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
roger999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 844
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CristianTabush
Boost or no boost? This should be good for non-boosted settings. Depending on the length of your straightaway.
Boost, dont know the length of straightway, that is in small hall so probably is not very long...
roger999 is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 02:47 AM
  #2321  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Posts: 786
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by artwork
I think this chart is really nice, but it is not entirely accurate...I have been running 31/104 64p and according to this chart that wont fit.
Hm.

I must see it.

I don't have this 104/64p

I just calculate it from 48p and some tests for 64p I did,
it could works but you know

Regards!
m.
M.Abramowicz is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 03:05 AM
  #2322  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 339
Default

Originally Posted by roger999
Boost, dont know the length of straightway, that is in small hall so probably is not very long...
If boosted you should start from a fdr of about 8.5 to 7.0, depending on track size and motor/esc brand
Fastfreddy74 is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 04:58 AM
  #2323  
Tech Regular
 
JRXS_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 386
Default

Cheers Jorge and Cristian, I'll give A3 a try at the track tomorrow and come back with some feedback.

I'll share a bit of know how now. I was advised by two Associated drivers to run Xray springs. I'm running 2.8 on the front and 2.6 on the rear. The car felt much freer without losing traction
JRXS_chris is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 08:54 AM
  #2324  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
CristianTabush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,165
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Chris, have you seen my Thread? Our springs approximate the XRay springs very much, except they fit much better on the AE shock.

The Xray C2.8 springs are 16 lb springs and the C2.6 are 14.82 lb springs. With the long links it is just about perfect. With shorter links, like I run on our vertical-stud bulkheads, I went slightly softer to a 13.5lb rear and a 15.5lb front spring.

Give the A3 a shot, you'll find that you don't need to re-tighten the arms after every run anymore. Good place to start on the outside is with 4mm underneath the outside stud in the rear and 2mm in the front, with the extra long links (7 hole).
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 02:30 PM
  #2325  
Tech Master
 
daleburr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 1,090
Default

Originally Posted by CristianTabush
Yes, it is actually closer to 1.5mm lower. Personally, we liked the A3 position more. Yes, many of the AE guys run the B0, but the car is not as consistent because the arms get the loosest with the B blocks. You can get very close to the B0 roll center by raising the outside camber link by 2 mm to a total of 4mm on the outside or you can start using shorter links to increase your roll stiffness to something similar. We are working on a solution for the blocks to not move over at Reflex. Maybe then, the B0 will be a good option, but as long as they get that loose, I would recommend to stay away from them. They will not hold up properly for a complete run.
B0 blocks with alloy spacers definitely doesn't work, they just rotate.

I made up some carbon spacers and this fixes the problem; the spacers are the full size of the blocks and I roughened the surface with 60 grit sandpaper, so there's much more surface area and friction.

Maybe something you guys could produce? A few people have mentioned it but no one is doing it yet.
daleburr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.