SC10 4x4 Thread
#4246
thanks. Will add that to the list.
So for those who use the HT pads, do you use 2 pads at once, or just 1 on the outside,etc?
Also, does anyone have a list of things they recommend to purchase as far as upgrades to what the sc10 4x4 comes with out of the box when going with 550 motor power?
So Far I am thinking:
- ASC91170 HT pads
- ASC7495 Vented Slipper hubs (is this needed?)
Anything else?
So for those who use the HT pads, do you use 2 pads at once, or just 1 on the outside,etc?
Also, does anyone have a list of things they recommend to purchase as far as upgrades to what the sc10 4x4 comes with out of the box when going with 550 motor power?
So Far I am thinking:
- ASC91170 HT pads
- ASC7495 Vented Slipper hubs (is this needed?)
Anything else?
Last edited by Cain; 07-07-2011 at 09:26 AM.
#4249
for slipper pad setup on the clutch basket, what in general are people going with? (ie- 2 standard pads and 1 high torque pad, etc)
Any need for the vented slipper hub at all with the clutch basket using 550 motor power?
Any need for the vented slipper hub at all with the clutch basket using 550 motor power?
#4250
I am currenlty running a standard pad on the inner hub for front drive and two HD pads in the clutch basket. I really like this setup and it seems to keep the temps down on the slipper and the pads have been lasting much much longer under the 550 motor.
#4252
Can we all measure the thickness of every part in the slipper assembly, including top shaft and thread length and compare?
I am wondering if thickness vaiance is causing this.
I am running a tekin 4.5T 550 on ASPHALT with jumps and have no slipper issues or changes during the run, 3.8mm, rear HD pad and vented plate
I will measure mine tonite
I am wondering if thickness vaiance is causing this.
I am running a tekin 4.5T 550 on ASPHALT with jumps and have no slipper issues or changes during the run, 3.8mm, rear HD pad and vented plate
I will measure mine tonite
#4253
With the basket setup I could still pull the trip even at the end of the 8 min. main. Something I could only have dreamed of doing with the stock slipper setup.
#4256
Sorry, PUI, lol. But honestly this issue stuck out like a sore thumb from day 1 but the AE guy i talked to said it wasnt a problem.
#4257
Say 400 kits went out the first month and 300 the second. That's 700 kits out there.
Of those, let's say Associated gets 60 calls regarding loose shock screws and about 30 on low diff fluid. Thus out of 700 kits, 60-90 had these issues. That's a 8.6-12.9% failure rate. That's going to get Associated's attention. Now, problem is, that the kits that are shipping out today were probably ordered and the instructions on how these parts are to be assembled were done three months ago! That means even if they call production TODAY and tell them to make the changes those kits probably won't be seen on store shelves for 2-3 months from now.
Now the issue with the slipper pads is probably a far smaller % than the issues with the shocks and diffs. After all, almost every person who has this kit AND has posted on this thread have had the diff/shock issue (which is still probably only a very small percentage of the owners out there) while only a handful are complaining about the slipper issue. So let's say Associated gets 5-10 calls on the slipper. That's a 0.7 - 1.4% failure rate. To a manufacturer like Associated, that equals "wasn't a problem".
Please note, I don't know Associated's actual sales, production or customer complaint numbers. I'm drawing from my own experiance in the industry and laying out a possible scenario as to why Associated would claim the slippers aren't a problem.
#4260
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,974
From: Norwood, OH...and CCRCR and The OhioRCFactory
Got to remember that you have to do manufacturer math with these kinds of things.
Say 400 kits went out the first month and 300 the second. That's 700 kits out there.
Of those, let's say Associated gets 60 calls regarding loose shock screws and about 30 on low diff fluid. Thus out of 700 kits, 60-90 had these issues. That's a 8.6-12.9% failure rate. That's going to get Associated's attention. Now, problem is, that the kits that are shipping out today were probably ordered and the instructions on how these parts are to be assembled were done three months ago! That means even if they call production TODAY and tell them to make the changes those kits probably won't be seen on store shelves for 2-3 months from now.
Now the issue with the slipper pads is probably a far smaller % than the issues with the shocks and diffs. After all, almost every person who has this kit AND has posted on this thread have had the diff/shock issue (which is still probably only a very small percentage of the owners out there) while only a handful are complaining about the slipper issue. So let's say Associated gets 5-10 calls on the slipper. That's a 0.7 - 1.4% failure rate. To a manufacturer like Associated, that equals "wasn't a problem".
Please note, I don't know Associated's actual sales, production or customer complaint numbers. I'm drawing from my own experiance in the industry and laying out a possible scenario as to why Associated would claim the slippers aren't a problem.
Say 400 kits went out the first month and 300 the second. That's 700 kits out there.
Of those, let's say Associated gets 60 calls regarding loose shock screws and about 30 on low diff fluid. Thus out of 700 kits, 60-90 had these issues. That's a 8.6-12.9% failure rate. That's going to get Associated's attention. Now, problem is, that the kits that are shipping out today were probably ordered and the instructions on how these parts are to be assembled were done three months ago! That means even if they call production TODAY and tell them to make the changes those kits probably won't be seen on store shelves for 2-3 months from now.
Now the issue with the slipper pads is probably a far smaller % than the issues with the shocks and diffs. After all, almost every person who has this kit AND has posted on this thread have had the diff/shock issue (which is still probably only a very small percentage of the owners out there) while only a handful are complaining about the slipper issue. So let's say Associated gets 5-10 calls on the slipper. That's a 0.7 - 1.4% failure rate. To a manufacturer like Associated, that equals "wasn't a problem".
Please note, I don't know Associated's actual sales, production or customer complaint numbers. I'm drawing from my own experiance in the industry and laying out a possible scenario as to why Associated would claim the slippers aren't a problem.



5Likes
just kidding man