Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated B4.2 Thread >

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2013 | 06:38 PM
  #5101  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

the 4x1.3 are the same as the losi 55x4's right?
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 07:24 PM
  #5102  
DanielC.'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,755
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
the 4x1.3 are the same as the losi 55x4's right?
1.3 is a hair smaller than a 55. So just a bit more pack. But it's apples to oranges comparing the tapered AE machined pistons to a flat TLR one.
DanielC. is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 09:11 PM
  #5103  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
the 4x1.3 are the same as the losi 55x4's right?
Not even close. Heavier shock oil was nec for me. I run on higher grip bumpy indoor clay with large jumps. Talk about setups being difficult to find. Lol. 4x1.3 s are what I currently use with good handling everywhere except I still slap real good off the larger jumps, so hard I get a hop every now and then. With a tapered piston the fluid flow goes through a shallower port which affects feel. From what I have tested, I need to run 42.5 up front and 37.5 in the rear. This seems heavy but works good. Losi 55's required 32.5 up front and 30 out back on the same track layout. I just got some 3x1.4's tapered to test with next. Then I am gonna try some tricks with bladders on the 4x1.3's to control bottoming
bambambennett is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 09:30 PM
  #5104  
3srcracing's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,970
From: Utah
Default

So I am doing a order to get a few parts I need and I need to spend like a extra $10 or so dollars to get free shipping. I was kinda looking at the MIP topshaft, is that any good?

I know a lot of people use it because it reduces weight, but is there any other perks to it?
3srcracing is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 09:34 PM
  #5105  
Matt Trimmings's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (171)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,313
From: Tucson AZ
Default

Originally Posted by 3srcracing
So I am doing a order to get a few parts I need and I need to spend like a extra $10 or so dollars to get free shipping. I was kinda looking at the MIP topshaft, is that any good?

I know a lot of people use it because it reduces weight, but is there any other perks to it?
It's a nice piece, significantly lighter than the stock one. Where are you ordering from?
Matt Trimmings is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 09:38 PM
  #5106  
3srcracing's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,970
From: Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Trimmings
It's a nice piece, significantly lighter than the stock one. Where are you ordering from?
A Main Hobbies, just kinda got a few things to tune up the car a little more, then just realized it was only like $13 for the stuff I actually needed. Would've bought from my local hobby shop but they didn't have the stuff I needed.
3srcracing is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 09:53 PM
  #5107  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,412
Default

The MIP shaft is good. I use it in my stock buggy.
chevmaro is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 10:21 PM
  #5108  
CHIZZLE's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,291
From: Glendale, AZ
Default

I'd get the X-Factory top shaft. Lasts a long time.
CHIZZLE is offline  
Old 05-12-2013 | 10:35 PM
  #5109  
mingoglia's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 444
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by CHIZZLE
I'd get the X-Factory top shaft. Lasts a long time.
NOW I know why you're so much faster and more consistent than me!
mingoglia is offline  
Old 05-13-2013 | 01:33 AM
  #5110  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 413
Default

hi there

now i am back to associated. i switched from durango , no more slipping ball diff :-), haha
awesome, how free the drivetrain on the b4.2 runs. i never had this on the dex210.

make it sense to run a low profile servo on the b4.2 or do i need the extra weight of a normal servo like a thunder tiger 1015?

i only have shprt lipo packs and would drun on a med-low grip dirt track.

i would go with my lrp x11 7.5t motor with a smaller rotor or with my speed passion 8.5t engine.

i have two orion r10 pro esc here, but i am thinking about to get the new lrp flow esc.
lrp esc is more linear and the break has always a better feel.

mike
mihaelbencek is offline  
Old 05-13-2013 | 05:33 AM
  #5111  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 378
Default

Mike,
I like my Orion better than my LRP for mod class. I have found the Orion to be smoother and have better brakes than my LRP. That being said, try your fresh B4.2 with your current setup first, then change it to an LRP if you dont like the feel of the Orion. I think you will be more than happy with the performance .
bambambennett is offline  
Old 05-13-2013 | 06:30 AM
  #5112  
mingoglia's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 444
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by mihaelbencek
hi there

now i am back to associated. i switched from durango , no more slipping ball diff :-), haha
awesome, how free the drivetrain on the b4.2 runs. i never had this on the dex210.

make it sense to run a low profile servo on the b4.2 or do i need the extra weight of a normal servo like a thunder tiger 1015?

i only have shprt lipo packs and would drun on a med-low grip dirt track.

i would go with my lrp x11 7.5t motor with a smaller rotor or with my speed passion 8.5t engine.

i have two orion r10 pro esc here, but i am thinking about to get the new lrp flow esc.
lrp esc is more linear and the break has always a better feel.

mike
To give you an idea weight-wise, I put a new B4 on the track last week and I'm at 1491 grams with a shorty pack and 7g next to the receiver. I do not have the ballast weight that comes with the FT installed. That's with a standard size receiver. I'll be adding the additional 7g somewhere (and maybe an extra coat of paint on the body for the extra gram -LOL), haven't decided where to get up to the 1499. In other words, these things are light so don't worry about it. If you have one already, great... if not, just go with standard.
mingoglia is offline  
Old 05-13-2013 | 07:36 AM
  #5113  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Wow, are you running it that light for 17.5? I know for 13.5, that would be hard to drive at that weight.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 05-13-2013 | 07:50 AM
  #5114  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2
Default

speaking of lite-weight, what items are available for the B4.2 to lighten the rotating mass of the transmission?
H4rM is offline  
Old 05-13-2013 | 07:55 AM
  #5115  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by H4rM
speaking of lite-weight, what items are available for the B4.2 to lighten the rotating mass of the transmission?
Alum top shaft and avid slipper. I have not weighed it, but the avid is supposed to be lighter than the stock and way less than the vts
Wildcat1971 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.