RC10B4.1 FT/WC
09-09-2012 | 04:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,053
From: All 48 states...
I bet there is no one on here running stock inserts.??????
09-09-2012 | 04:47 PM
09-09-2012 | 04:51 PM
Tried them with no luck. They worked great for a night or 2. The AKA will last me 2 sets of tires. Red soft are what I use.
09-09-2012 | 06:00 PM
Suspended
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 484
To all of you arguing about front inserts.
Is it that hard to comprehend that different inserts work best for different tracks? High bite tracks will require an insert that is more firm. Lower bite tracks will require a softer insert. Think of it like air pressure in a real car tire. On pavement (high bite) you want more air pressure than if you were driving in sand (low bite, soft inserts). Remember, different tracks require different combinations to get the most out of your car. Why do you think there are so many tread patterns, rubber compounds, and inserts?
Is it that hard to comprehend that different inserts work best for different tracks? High bite tracks will require an insert that is more firm. Lower bite tracks will require a softer insert. Think of it like air pressure in a real car tire. On pavement (high bite) you want more air pressure than if you were driving in sand (low bite, soft inserts). Remember, different tracks require different combinations to get the most out of your car. Why do you think there are so many tread patterns, rubber compounds, and inserts?
09-09-2012 | 06:11 PM
same, I love my buggy. SC is ok if there is no wind. But i will be dusting off the T4 and running it on out local 8th scale track.
09-09-2012 | 06:32 PM
To all of you arguing about front inserts.
Is it that hard to comprehend that different inserts work best for different tracks? High bite tracks will require an insert that is more firm. Lower bite tracks will require a softer insert. Think of it like air pressure in a real car tire. On pavement (high bite) you want more air pressure than if you were driving in sand (low bite, soft inserts). Remember, different tracks require different combinations to get the most out of your car. Why do you think there are so many tread patterns, rubber compounds, and inserts?
Is it that hard to comprehend that different inserts work best for different tracks? High bite tracks will require an insert that is more firm. Lower bite tracks will require a softer insert. Think of it like air pressure in a real car tire. On pavement (high bite) you want more air pressure than if you were driving in sand (low bite, soft inserts). Remember, different tracks require different combinations to get the most out of your car. Why do you think there are so many tread patterns, rubber compounds, and inserts?
09-09-2012 | 06:50 PM
09-09-2012 | 06:55 PM
To all of you arguing about front inserts.
Is it that hard to comprehend that different inserts work best for different tracks? High bite tracks will require an insert that is more firm. Lower bite tracks will require a softer insert. Think of it like air pressure in a real car tire. On pavement (high bite) you want more air pressure than if you were driving in sand (low bite, soft inserts). Remember, different tracks require different combinations to get the most out of your car. Why do you think there are so many tread patterns, rubber compounds, and inserts?
Is it that hard to comprehend that different inserts work best for different tracks? High bite tracks will require an insert that is more firm. Lower bite tracks will require a softer insert. Think of it like air pressure in a real car tire. On pavement (high bite) you want more air pressure than if you were driving in sand (low bite, soft inserts). Remember, different tracks require different combinations to get the most out of your car. Why do you think there are so many tread patterns, rubber compounds, and inserts?
And we will still not be able to help one soul. And not only that we don't know how one person drives what there set up is and if they even know how to put holes in the tire or wheel one or both. Uhg!
To bad...... I guess from now on I will just say walk up to the fastest racer at the track and run what he runs.....
09-09-2012 | 07:02 PM
Tech Addict
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 550
From: Tacoma, wa
09-09-2012 | 07:04 PM
http://www.jconcepts.net/store/index...roducts_id=465
09-09-2012 | 07:04 PM
Team orion carbon pro
I know the preferred battery is a shorty pack butt.. I have two different Team Orion carbon pro batteries I wanted to use for stock class. They are really tight under carbon strap bends the hold down. I also have a couple reedy batteries that are same height. Is there a different battery hold down or does nobody use these two batteries.My Gens ace fits fine butt would rather use these other packs.
09-09-2012 | 07:11 PM
I know the preferred battery is a shorty pack butt.. I have two different Team Orion carbon pro batteries I wanted to use for stock class. They are really tight under carbon strap bends the hold down. I also have a couple reedy batteries that are same height. Is there a different battery hold down or does nobody use these two batteries.My Gens ace fits fine butt would rather use these other packs.
09-09-2012 | 07:16 PM
I know the preferred battery is a shorty pack butt.. I have two different Team Orion carbon pro batteries I wanted to use for stock class. They are really tight under carbon strap bends the hold down. I also have a couple reedy batteries that are same height. Is there a different battery hold down or does nobody use these two batteries.My Gens ace fits fine butt would rather use these other packs.
09-09-2012 | 07:23 PM
are you running the 4.1 stock tower or the carbon tower? some batteries wont fit under the carbon tower, because it was not upgraded for lipos. if your talking about the front thump/twist screws. all batteries are not the same height. some have thicker cases, some of the higher mah packs are a little taller. if you want to run your carbons, adjust the twist screws for the carbons and run those.