Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Orion Wasp REV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2006 | 06:10 AM
  #166  
M7H's Avatar
M7H
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,198
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Nano
Remember that Josh basically was running an EFRA legal engine, versus the competition that were running IFMAR legal engines which are less restricted.
The only regulations EFRA has and IFMAR doesn't are these 2:
1) Max. 7mm bore in crank
2) End of crankhole near backplate, can have a max. rounding of 0.5mm, (so no turboscoop going into this hole)

On the other hand if Team Orion was running EFRA legal engines, tells me 2 things:
1) they were so convinced of them selves, that they would win the worlds even with an EFRA legal engine (But then just in case would also have an IFMAR legal version ready)
2) they were so stupid NOT to use an IFMAR legal engine, which now even might have cost them the title.....
M7H is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 06:11 AM
  #167  
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 948
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Another interesting thing to note was that Josh was running a Sirio 2611 pipe

M7H: I walked around the pits and managed to see 1 Mega ZX12!! Thats right, just 1. Serpent were running Mainly MaxPower SL3 WC, and a few MF's. What are your thoughts on this?
Rody is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 06:42 AM
  #168  
Nano's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 205
From: Switzerland
Default

Originally Posted by M7H
The only regulations EFRA has and IFMAR doesn't are these 2:
1) Max. 7mm bore in crank
2) End of crankhole near backplate, can have a max. rounding of 0.5mm, (so no turboscoop going into this hole)

On the other hand if Team Orion was running EFRA legal engines, tells me 2 things:
1) they were so convinced of them selves, that they would win the worlds even with an EFRA legal engine (But then just in case would also have an IFMAR legal version ready)
2) they were so stupid NOT to use an IFMAR legal engine, which now even might have cost them the title.....
My point was that these 2 EFRA requirements are considered as restrictions (made to limit performance and/or cost of the engine). Because of it's new technology the CRF engine is not restricted by these requirements. It does not need crankshafts with 7mm+ bore and funky turboscoops to be the fastest engine on the track even when competing with engines which are not EFRA legal.

The crankshaft that was used was the same 6mm crankshaft you get when you buy the engine. Modified cranks were tested but they made the car difficult to handle because of excessive power.

Last edited by Nano; 09-21-2006 at 06:59 AM.
Nano is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 06:56 AM
  #169  
Corse-R's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,121
From: Madrid (Spain)
Default

Originally Posted by Nano
My point was that these 2 EFRA requirements are considered as restrictions (made to limit performance and/or cost of the engine).
Well... In some things we think the same... lately (at least on the past 5 or 6 years) EFRA has been doing some stupid things trying to 'equalize' or at least to slow some costs associated with racing. Many years ago was the biggest stupidity with the infamous 12 turn limit on Touring cars who opened the doomed 'search for the n milivolt more on the batts', later was the 7mm crank bore and the 'turbo scoop' that in few days, deemed illegal almost all the .12 engines that were on the market (and of course, the need of buying new engines).

I'm not a newbie on this... in fact if you can search on the Team Orion forums, you can see some posts made by me regarding this. EFRA sometimes should look farther than their own belly and try to being in the same line of other blocks (ROAR, FAMAR, FEMCA,....)
Corse-R is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 06:56 AM
  #170  
M7H's Avatar
M7H
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,198
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Rody
What are your thoughts on this?
I don't know.....

But, I don't want to talk about Mega here, as somebody will give comment on that probably.....
You have a PM though.......
M7H is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 07:01 AM
  #171  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Default

Josh Congratulation for your final, too bad that you had receiver packs problems...
barclayrc is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 07:06 AM
  #172  
M7H's Avatar
M7H
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,198
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Corse-R
.....trying to 'equalize' or at least to slow some costs associated with racing. Many years ago was the biggest stupidity with the infamous 12 turn limit on Touring cars who opened the doomed 'search for the n milivolt more on the batts', later was the 7mm crank bore and the 'turbo scoop' that in few days, deemed illegal almost all the .12 engines that were on the market (and of course, the need of buying new engines).
that's indeed not really lowering the costs.........

I'm not a newbie on this... in fact if you can search on the Team Orion forums, you can see some posts made by me regarding this. EFRA sometimes should look farther than their own belly and try to being in the same line of other blocks (ROAR, FAMAR, FEMCA,....)
Here in Holland we have the national NOMAC regulations, under these regulations the Orion engine is even not allowed, because on top of the EFRA rules the bore in the crank also needs to be perpendicular (90 degrees) to the backplate......

Luckily I drive 1/8 scale, which is an "outlaw" class.......
M7H is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 07:12 AM
  #173  
M7H's Avatar
M7H
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,198
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Nano
My point was that these 2 EFRA requirements are considered as restrictions (made to limit performance and/or cost of the engine). Because of it's new technology the CRF engine is not restricted by these requirements. It does not need crankshafts with 7mm+ bore and funky turboscoops to be the fastest engine on the track even when competing with engines which are not EFRA legal.

The crankshaft that was used was the same 6mm crankshaft you get when you buy the engine. Modified cranks were tested but they made the car difficult to handle because of excessive power.
But, this was said on the other tread about this engine:
Originally Posted by ziggy12345
I asked if the CRF is EFRA and BRCA legal and Team Orion confirmed it is. I asked how this could be when the hole in the crank is more than 7mm but no response. They are using them at national level here and in Europe so guess they are legal.

I run mine on 25% Nitro as it didnt like 16% but not at nationals.
6mm, 7mm, or bigger......
M7H is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 08:20 AM
  #174  
ziggy12345's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,596
From: West Midlands, UK
Default

As the hole in the crank exits at 45 deg the hole isnt round so it must be measured along its major axis and thats bigger than 7mm

Cheers
ziggy12345 is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 01:50 PM
  #175  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 174
Default

A diameter is always measured at 90° of two parallel lines from a hole (tube). You can also try to insert a gauge of 7mm, if it goes in it means it is bigger than 7mm if you can^t insert it, it is smaller than the gauge. The CRF engine has a 6mm hole.
WorldCup2004 is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 02:04 PM
  #176  
rmdhawaii's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,806
Default

Originally Posted by Nano
I spoke to Didier (one of the two guys from Team Orion/CRF at the track) this morning and they did test/use new ports configuration. We are going to get all the info together and see what evolutions we will bring to the engine if needed.
So what does all of this testing mean to the consumer and those of us that already have the engine? If it's decided that the engine runs better with a different port configuration, are we going to get new parts or would it be something that we would have to purchase?

Thanks Nano!
rmdhawaii is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 02:18 PM
  #177  
Dynamite's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 614
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by rmdhawaii
So what does all of this testing mean to the consumer and those of us that already have the engine? If it's decided that the engine runs better with a different port configuration, are we going to get new parts or would it be something that we would have to purchase?

Thanks Nano!
of course you will have to buy it!
Dynamite is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 02:27 PM
  #178  
rmdhawaii's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,806
Default

Originally Posted by Dynamite
of course you will have to buy it!
If they turn it into an option part, then that would be fine.

If they change what's sold NIB, I would have an issue with that.
rmdhawaii is offline  
Old 09-22-2006 | 07:13 AM
  #179  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,120
From: www.moorebankraceway.com
Default

Originally Posted by rmdhawaii
If they turn it into an option part, then that would be fine.

If they change what's sold NIB, I would have an issue with that.
well guess what if/when they release the new liner with the less extreme ports it will probably be a NIB part...so there's gonna be problems down in "hawaii" i'm guessing
TomB is offline  
Old 09-22-2006 | 10:12 PM
  #180  
mxwrench's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 472
From: Victorville, CA USA
Default

Originally Posted by TomB
well guess what if/when they release the new liner with the less extreme ports it will probably be a NIB part...so there's gonna be problems down in "hawaii" i'm guessing
The only part of the CRF engine that has 'Extreme port timing is the crankshaft at around 250deg.

The Cyl port timing is actually quite tame at around 165 ex and 110 transfer. This is much milder than most current top level engines on the market many around 175 ex and 125 transfer.

But also keep in mind that most of these 'other' engines have crank timing of around 210 deg.

BK
mxwrench is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.