|
Originally Posted by Cardiak
(Post 15291672)
Alright so I'm trying to get my 28-8 completely tuned. I thought I had it dialed until today I took it it and got it up to temp and made several high speed passes. The idle was pretty much a 3 step instead of a 2 step. If I had let it come in and sit for 4 seconds or longer after a WOT pass, it would be loaded up and kind of sluggish once I hammered the throttle for the first couple of feet. From my knowledge, I should be able to bring it in and let it idle for 10 or more seconds and still get a clean pull unless it's an excessive amount of time idling. So I leaned my LSN and backed off on the idle screw. My idle gap is somewhere between .5 and .7. I eventually got it to where it could idle longer than 5 seconds without loading up and still having a clean launch with a very light trail of smoke after hammering it until about the midrange it started to have a more noticeable smoke cloud. Am I going in the right direction or am I possibly going away from the tune? The idle seems to be getting closer to a 2 step at the current tune.
|
Originally Posted by alex_blais
(Post 15271870)
How is it better, the Paloma is doing over 11 minutes and has lots of power according to this thread and post #74
https://www.rctech.net/forum/offroad...edition-5.html And seems to be running for 7+ gallons. Is the rolling able to do 12-13 minutes? My track is technical with no long straights and running a buggy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=uHQvS-93HWE Thanks |
Hello to all, I have a doubt which is the exhaust and Novarossi manifold the best for Fuel-Economy? or specific to Fuel Economy?
Thank you |
Originally Posted by Pedro Jesus
(Post 15298544)
Hello to all, I have a doubt which is the exhaust and Novarossi manifold the best for Fuel-Economy? or specific to Fuel Economy?
Thank you |
Originally Posted by HaulinBass
(Post 15237401)
Ran an 11:22 with the karma(silver head)69 type carb,2096 w 2050 double bend header, blue restictor, stock shimming and a c5tgc plug. After a 20 min heat soak run. Not to shabby for the 90 i paid for it haha
|
Novarossi launches a NEW engine
NOVAROSSI BX3 |
Originally Posted by DXPinoyRC
(Post 15308486)
2096 will do you well sir.
And the Manifold Thank You |
|
|
Originally Posted by DXPinoyRC
(Post 15308490)
damn. Where the heck do you buy a karma for $90 ?! LOL. btw.. what is the double bend 2050 manifold?
|
Pedro, it depends on witch enigne you will use it on.
F.eks: I get the smoothest engine with the 41021 type manifold and a very good fuel economy on the Top Elite 5. But the engines is even better with a little more snap and revs with the 41001 header that is angled in two 90 degree bends. On my Mantra, 41001 is not so good for me, as it gets a little to snappy and i use the 41021. I usually use the 2096 pipe on both engines. Edit: the doubble bend headers usually makes more snap and the curved ones is smoother. I have compared on OS and Nova engines. Headers that i have compared is the same length and diameter and not nessecerly OS or Nova manifolds. |
[QUOTE = am; 15310347] Pedro, depende da bruxa enigne que você vai usar.
Por exemplo, eu recebo o motor mais suave com o manifold 41021 e uma economia de combustível muito boa no Top Elite 5. Mas os motores são ainda melhores com um pouco mais de pressão e rotação com o encabeçamento 41001 que é inclinado em dois graus de 90 graus. curvas. No meu Mantra, 41001 não é tão bom para mim, pois fica um pouco mal-humorado e eu uso o 41021. Eu costumo usar o tubo 2096 em ambos os motores. Edit: os cabeçalhos dobráveis geralmente fazem mais snap e os curvos são mais suaves. Eu comparei em motores OS e Nova. Cabeçalhos que i se em comparação é o mesmo comprimento e diâmetro e OS não nessecerly ou colectores Nova. [/ CITAÇÕES] Novarossi rebrand engine RB S7 MSC Novarossi spoke to me on 51006M and 41021. * |
Sorry but i have not ran RB based engies since WS7 and Ws7 II. The old ones liked 063 pipes and a spesific RB manifold Rody asked the teamdrivers to cut to a spesific lenght. This was when we used silicon between engine and manifold.
NB: i was never an RB team driver but have a friend that was :-) |
[QUOTE = am; 15310583] Desculpe, mas eu não tenho rodado engies baseados em RB desde WS7 e Ws7 II. Os antigos gostavam de 063 canos e uma variedade de RB. Rody pediu às equipes que cortassem um pedaço de peso. Foi quando usamos o silício entre o motor e o coletor.
NB: i nunca foi um piloto da equipe RB mas tem um amigo que foi: -) [/ QUOTE] I asked only about the Novarossi exhaust, not specific to the engine And they said these |
Dunno if this helps but I'm running the Ielasi Tuned Nova's (F^&king awesome power) and have found the EFRA 9901 Pipe best power and economy wise with both Ielasi 5T and 7T.
any questions PM me (I'm a bit slack at remembering to check previous posts) Cheers |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 10:12 AM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.