Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road > Offroad Nitro Engine Forum
Houstons Engine Service H.E.S. >

Houstons Engine Service H.E.S.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree22Likes

Houstons Engine Service H.E.S.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2012 | 01:17 PM
  #7201  
GREGORY!'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,110
From: Greece
Default

Monty?or any one that know!there is a pipe that has the same dimensions with JP1 pipe but is efra legal?
GREGORY! is offline  
Old 10-26-2012 | 02:16 PM
  #7202  
houston's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by GREGORY!
Monty?or any one that know!there is a pipe that has the same dimensions with JP1 pipe but is efra legal?
closest in novarossi pipes that is EFRA legal would be 2084ss (#51018)

9853ss is a better performer but is not EFRA legal
houston is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 05:45 AM
  #7203  
GREGORY!'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,110
From: Greece
Default

Originally Posted by houston
closest in novarossi pipes that is EFRA legal would be 2084ss (#51018)

9853ss is a better performer but is not EFRA legal
the 9853ss is better pipe than the two?or only the jp1?i had read that the 2084ss is your favorite pipe.
GREGORY! is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 07:42 AM
  #7204  
houston's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by GREGORY!
the 9853ss is better pipe than the two?or only the jp1?i had read that the 2084ss is your favorite pipe.
No not 2084 ,the 2096 is the goods

Not sure if its efra legal though
houston is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 10:33 AM
  #7205  
Lille-bror's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,792
From: Frederikshavn, Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by houston
No not 2084 ,the 2096 is the goods

Not sure if its efra legal though
It is EFRA legal

EFRA muffler homologation list 2012
Lille-bror is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 10:35 AM
  #7206  
GREGORY!'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,110
From: Greece
Default

so 2096ss is the best from them?but it is not closer in dimensions with jp1?
GREGORY! is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 10:42 AM
  #7207  
Lille-bror's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,792
From: Frederikshavn, Denmark
Default

What engine do you have Gregory?

I like 9901 pipe better than 2096 (similar to RB2045). There is more grunt in the 9901. If you look at the best Novarossi drivers around the World, they always runs 9901 as far as I have read.
Lille-bror is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 12:55 PM
  #7208  
houston's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

2096ss hasnt been played with much by the fast boys i bet
houston is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 12:57 PM
  #7209  
Lille-bror's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,792
From: Frederikshavn, Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by houston
2096ss hasnt been played with much by the fast boys i bet
Hehe. They better start listen to you
Lille-bror is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 01:00 PM
  #7210  
houston's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by Lille-bror
Hehe. They better start listen to you
last years nitro challenge i asked adam if he tried the 2096 pipe and he said no , i was a lil surprised to say the least , the pipe is great , you gotta lean on the hsn more than usual so it can be misleading on how the pipe performs
many times racers try pipes and dont tune the engine in , you cant actually feel the power curve and test the fuel consumption without tuning the engine in , sooooooo.........


i actually RACE rc cars Bjarne , and very well

i dont just PLAY/BASH with rc cars like some do
houston is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 01:12 PM
  #7211  
Lille-bror's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,792
From: Frederikshavn, Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by houston
last years nitro challenge i asked adam if he tried the 2096 pipe and he said no , i was a lil surprised to say the least , the pipe is great , you gotta lean on the hsn more than usual so it can be misleading on how the pipe performs
many times racers try pipes and dont tune the engine in , you cant actually feel the power curve and test the fuel consumption without tuning the engine in , sooooooo.........


i actually RACE rc cars Bjarne , and very well

i dont just PLAY/BASH with rc cars like some do
EDIT: Monty: Write what you mean DIRECTLY to the specific person instead of packing things in.
I retuned the engine. The bottom is softer with the 2096 compared to the 9901.

Last edited by Lille-bror; 10-27-2012 at 02:58 PM.
Lille-bror is offline  
Old 10-27-2012 | 05:11 PM
  #7212  
houston's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

i just write what i feel at the time Bjarne , if its confusing im sorry bro


the 2096ss is a very well balanced pipe , i like its performance as an overall pkg better than the 9901ss on many engines but some engines really are more suited to the 9901ss' power delivery as well as some drivers much prefer the 9901ss

they are both great pipes with different characteristics that each driver needs to feel for themselves to see how they like each
houston is offline  
Old 10-28-2012 | 06:46 AM
  #7213  
beidle99's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,932
From: Woodbury, NJ
Default

The 2096 really brings a nova based motor to life in my opinion. I have a 9901 and the 2096. The 2096 really smooths out the bottom end and by doing so gave better acceleration because of reduced wheel spin. The mid range was super smooth, almost deceiving, because it has a lot of power. It also alot of milage to the motor, and the top end was definatly improved. IMO the 9901 just felt flat on the top end to me yet very punchy. On a small high traction track I might run the 9901 again, but for my local track that is on the medium size with traction that can go from grooved up to marbles the 2096 stays on my buggy. if you clutch it right the 2096 can also go from mild to wild on the bottom end too.
beidle99 is offline  
Old 10-28-2012 | 04:48 PM
  #7214  
houston's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,844
From: Sherwood,OR
Default

Originally Posted by beidle99
The 2096 really brings a nova based motor to life in my opinion. I have a 9901 and the 2096. The 2096 really smooths out the bottom end and by doing so gave better acceleration because of reduced wheel spin. The mid range was super smooth, almost deceiving, because it has a lot of power. It also alot of milage to the motor, and the top end was definatly improved. IMO the 9901 just felt flat on the top end to me yet very punchy. On a small high traction track I might run the 9901 again, but for my local track that is on the medium size with traction that can go from grooved up to marbles the 2096 stays on my buggy. if you clutch it right the 2096 can also go from mild to wild on the bottom end too.
i would agree with this

nick has had both and definitely knows which he likes and why
houston is offline  
Old 10-28-2012 | 05:03 PM
  #7215  
GREGORY!'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,110
From: Greece
Default

Originally Posted by Lille-bror
What engine do you have Gregory?

I like 9901 pipe better than 2096 (similar to RB2045). There is more grunt in the 9901. If you look at the best Novarossi drivers around the World, they always runs 9901 as far as I have read.

i have a picco evo 2 modified from powerhouse that is grid for a jp1 pipe.or a 9901ss pipe.(less)so i asked if there is a pipe similar with jp1 but efra numbered.
i use now an edit 2032 with good results.

Last edited by GREGORY!; 10-29-2012 at 12:44 AM.
GREGORY! is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.