![]() |
Re: Re: Thrustbearing after run.
Originally posted by InitialD Yup. Leave the grease in the balls. It will be fine. |
Originally posted by markp27 I working on the principle that Ayrton Senna honed his driving talent by practicing in England whenever it rained - hey, if it worked for him..... ;) :lol: |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thrustbearing after run.
Originally posted by InitialD I thought so too until crashed_1 pointed that out to me. True enough I went home to grind those dimples away and the "jump" went away. I think it is because the dogbones are free to move in the lateral position. And because the dogbone can sit in the dimple or sit elsewhere in the outdrive, there is a difference in play and makes for the "jump". |
Centax Q
If I add another shim to the thrust bearing holder end of the Centax, do I have to take a correspondingly sized one away from the spring adjuster end?
|
Originally posted by Motorman there are several methods on the flyweights, cutting the tips gives them less centrifical force as they get lighter so the engine must spin up more to overcome the spring and engage the clutch. this is good and bad. its good because you can get some more low end punch, but because the force is lower as engine torwue rises the clutch starts slipping as the shoe cannot hold the clamp on the bell tight enough. Mounting the flyweights in BETWEEN the post makes the flyweights "heavier". Originally posted by Motorman Glen the spring PN's are Mugen H0767 Silver Super hard Mugen H0764 Medium Originally posted by Motorman My 2 cents heavy flyweights and spring GOOD light flyweights and soft spring BAD |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thrustbearing after run.
Originally posted by markp27 Do you mean that because of the dog bone pins hitting the slots of the outdrives, there were dimples created? Originally posted by markp27 That would figure with the suspension jumping if the pins got "lodged" in the dimples :nod: |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thrustbearing after run.
Originally posted by InitialD :nod: Yup.:nod: The dogbone pins get lodged in and out of the dimples make the rear end vibrate and jump. |
Re: Centax Q
Originally posted by markp27 If I add another shim to the thrust bearing holder end of the Centax, do I have to take a correspondingly sized one away from the spring adjuster end? |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thrustbearing after run.
Originally posted by markp27 I wonder why the gap in the outdrives is so large, relatively speaking - this increases the force of the pins "hitting" the outdrives. |
Re: Re: Centax Q
Originally posted by InitialD Yup.:nod: Cheers, Mark. |
Re: Re: Re: Centax Q
Originally posted by markp27 The Centax seemed to be a little too slow on the uptake and as I have an end gap of 0,7 I thought I should add a 0,2 to bring the gap down to 0,5mm If you find that the clutchbell having difficulty spinning and tends to bind after adding 0.2 mm shim in the front end of the clutch, then you know that you have too much shims between the pre-tension nut and bearing. |
Originally posted by markp27 As I mention in the FAQ, though, the narrower the track, the less upwards suspension travel you get - but as I'm running 200mm with the 2x1mm spacers, then I still have plenty of uptravel :nod: So "cheating" with 2x1mm spacers to make 200 mm rear trackwidth would still create the possibility of making the rear suspension bind, does it not? The hubs would still be closer to the chassis even when you used spacers at the wheel hex adaptor. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Centax Q
Originally posted by InitialD You could always loosen the pre-tension nut of the clutch spring to get faster clutch engagement. Loosen it 1/4 of a turn at a time to get the best launch out of the corners and from standstill. If you find that the clutchbell having difficulty spinning and tends to bind after adding 0.2 mm shim in the front end of the clutch, then you know that you have too much shims between the pre-tension nut and bearing. |
Originally posted by InitialD I believe the less upward travel suspension is due to the rear dogbones having less horizontal space to travel or even binding when the suspension travels up and down. Lesser sideway movement due to smaller rear trackwidth. So "cheating" with 2x1mm spacers to make 200 mm rear trackwidth would still create the possibility of making the rear suspension bind, does it not? The hubs would still be closer to the chassis even when you used spacers at the wheel hex adaptor. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Centax Q
Originally posted by markp27 I wanted to try the shims as I already have the adjuster set to 0,5mm which doesn't leave much more room to play - thanks for the clutchbell tip :nod: Either that or your bottom end (LSN) is still on the rich side. Do a pinch test to check if your LSN is rich. |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 04:26 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.