![]() |
Originally Posted by JRGTR
(Post 9693521)
I receive mine yesterday! And I am starting to build right now!!! :tire:
Both cars hav my interest rightnow...... |
Originally Posted by RC MARKET
(Post 9690185)
ARROWMAX Released MTX5 Spare Parts
No matter how many times people have told you over the past many years nothing has changed, which is a real shame. Like others I can't be bothered waiting for you web pages to load. Like I said a real shame. |
Originally Posted by chovden
(Post 9693829)
Nobody else had problems with the rear camber links? when I use 0 offsett wheels and 199-200mm with then only about 1-2mm treads are into the ball link, I had to get some xray links and bals that I had to get it to work.
And the button head srews are not good and to big in the hex slot. Other then that I liked it just a lot of understeer with stock setup i'm suprised you said that it understeers:weird: the mtx5 looks like it would have mega steering. Is it entry understeer or exit understeer? Maybe use two hole pistons at the front if it is understeering on entry. I prefer two hole pistons on the front and i tune the bound/rebound with the oil and springs. |
Its on exit it was understeering fixed it now but was bad when I first drove it..
|
Originally Posted by CDS70
(Post 9696941)
How SLLOOOOOWWWW is your web site.
No matter how many times people have told you over the past many years nothing has changed, which is a real shame. Like others I can't be bothered waiting for you web pages to load. Like I said a real shame. to there thousands of potential customers, its a tough business world out there, yes real shame. |
Originally Posted by 1evo RRR Driver
(Post 9695979)
I will be following your post after u get the mtx on the track, interested to see how it compares to your Hk!!!!
Both cars hav my interest rightnow...... on the track it will be test next friday at the local track!!! The KM handles great!!! lot of traction and tons of steering!!! the MTX5 will be the next post theme!!! maybe the HK-1 will be for sale! |
Originally Posted by chovden
(Post 9697095)
Its on exit it was understeering fixed it now but was bad when I first drove it..
|
Originally Posted by TomB
(Post 9697555)
how did you fix it? did you raise the rear shocks?
|
does anybody who has driven nt1 or velox v10 in past tell us the differences on handling , to compare the two cars on the track?
|
Having a blast putting this thing together,just want to thank all that posted what to look out for doing the build:cool:
|
Me to
Forgot how good and easy the shocks are to build:D |
Originally Posted by chippy
(Post 9698761)
Me to
Forgot how good and easy the shocks are to build:D |
The shocks were an easy part of the build, no drama or anything overly complex.
I just got home from my first outing at England Park Raceway, car in kit build form was a mix of good and bad, nothing I did not expect though from a new model. Our track is bumpy these days, so really everything was just too stiff, so really I need thinner shock oil and maybe some purples on the front, and maybe on the rear. What was frustrating, was severe lack of turn in, maybe from lack of front end grip or other, actually softened the front bar by moving out the links (though you can't go out more than 2mm from flush), and stiffened the back by pushing in 2mm (though moved that back to flush for the final). But, neither fully worked, and in the end my pit man to the stars (thanks Trev) did a quick wind of the steering links before a heat and about 5mm total toe out made the car driveable. But I was fighting the car most the day, so I'll have to find ways to give the car that turn in and front grip I want, I'm looking at the Rob and Fuk setups right now, and I see raised front roll centres (on Robs), inward shock mounting (on both), and larger piston hole options on both, also softer shock oils in each and softer springs, a lot of which makes sense to me now. On the up side, considering the overdriving I had to do to get it round the track, it was forgiving in a sense, and the driveline efficiency is there in droves, the car was surprisingly fast with my N12T1 engine, it has good roll and seems to put every ounce of power to the track with a lot less loss than I felt on my 4. It also took a relative beating (it's only my second outing in open/pro touring), so some taps and tumbles, yet nothing broke, got to look a little closer into the two speed as it drifted a bit during the day, but 4x 5min heats, and a 20min final and all gears look almost as good as new, no signs of stripping etc. |
Originally Posted by Bishop
(Post 9700285)
The shocks were an easy part of the build, no drama or anything overly complex.
I just got home from my first outing at England Park Raceway, car in kit build form was a mix of good and bad, nothing I did not expect though from a new model. Our track is bumpy these days, so really everything was just too stiff, so really I need thinner shock oil and maybe some purples on the front, and maybe on the rear. What was frustrating, was severe lack of turn in, maybe from lack of front end grip or other, actually softened the front bar by moving out the links (though you can't go out more than 2mm from flush), and stiffened the back by pushing in 2mm (though moved that back to flush for the final). But, neither fully worked, and in the end my pit man to the stars (thanks Trev) did a quick wind of the steering links before a heat and about 5mm total toe out made the car driveable. But I was fighting the car most the day, so I'll have to find ways to give the car that turn in and front grip I want, I'm looking at the Rob and Fuk setups right now, and I see raised front roll centres (on Robs), inward shock mounting (on both), and larger piston hole options on both, also softer shock oils in each and softer springs, a lot of which makes sense to me now. On the up side, considering the overdriving I had to do to get it round the track, it was forgiving in a sense, and the driveline efficiency is there in droves, the car was surprisingly fast with my N12T1 engine, it has good roll and seems to put every ounce of power to the track with a lot less loss than I felt on my 4. It also took a relative beating (it's only my second outing in open/pro touring), so some taps and tumbles, yet nothing broke, got to look a little closer into the two speed as it drifted a bit during the day, but 4x 5min heats, and a 20min final and all gears look almost as good as new, no signs of stripping etc. has anyone played around with the 26 tooth side pulley? could someone tell me what tyre diameter split should be run with the 25 tooth side pulley and the 26 tooth pulley? |
You guys driving mtx5 have problem with run away car ?
I look inside mugen seiki website, mtx5 and mrx5 have same radio receiver box. Yesterday my friend total lost his car ( mrx5 ) on straight, .... his car hit the wall very hard .......... ( I want to tell him there is maybe heat and vibration problem with mrx5 radio box, thus he should consider to remove the receiver casing and stick the naked electronic pcb with thick foam to radio box ). But before I tell that suggestion..... I want to make sure my suggestion is a good one, so you guys in mtx5 have run away car problem ? |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 08:57 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.