Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree521Likes

TLR 8ightX

    Hide Wikipost
Old 03-15-2019, 09:43 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: TLR 8ightX
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: 1/8 IC Fan
TLR Eight X

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2018, 12:48 AM
  #61  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

slackinoff likes this.

Last edited by speedy2; 06-20-2018 at 05:19 AM.
speedy2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 12:49 AM
  #62  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Nice heatsink for the brake servo..


Last edited by speedy2; 06-20-2018 at 05:21 AM.
speedy2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 12:49 AM
  #63  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

speedy2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 12:50 AM
  #64  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

speedy2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 12:54 AM
  #65  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

speedy2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 12:55 AM
  #66  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

speedy2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 10:53 AM
  #67  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (63)
 
Kewlbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 450
Trader Rating: 63 (100%+)
Default

Seeing the latest results, I cant help but think, Is this car too stiff? I don't know much about anything, but my first impressions of the design was this thing has to be super solid. Maybe too solid. with the extended motor mount and the rear brace. I can see people cutting off the motor mount extension. There were extended motor mounts available aftermarket for the 3.0/4.0 but people do not use them much.



Kewlbug is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 11:31 AM
  #68  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

No.. that is wrong thinking: with a 3 mm chassis plate now, not 4 mm like before, the car will be MUCH more forgiving and stable in the rough and at lower speeds
I has more flex build in

and with a 3 mm chassis, if you don't have good long braces it will flex too much, perhaps break or bend after a while..
or the bell will make contact, or the center shafts could crash and bend on impact
To see also if the chassisplate has enough folded upwards sides or not..

Here the problem is happily fixed, with a nice long but plastic rear brace, even using an articulation at his base, and a longer engine mount, which is normaly an option part..
token likes this.

Last edited by speedy2; 08-05-2018 at 06:15 AM.
speedy2 is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 12:49 PM
  #69  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
slackinoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 332
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Excellent pictures.
slackinoff is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 02:28 PM
  #70  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (63)
 
Kewlbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 450
Trader Rating: 63 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by speedy2
No.. wrong thinking: with a 3 mm chassis plate now, not 4 mm like before, the car will be MUCH more forgiving
and with a 3 mm chassis, if you don't have good braces it will flex too much, perhaps break or bend
or the bell will make contact, or the center shafts will crash and bend on impact
Well, I'm just throwing ideas out there. Those seem to be the major differences to me over the old car (As well as changing all the suspension geometry). Hopefully setup changes will get the car up to speed.
Kewlbug is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 02:52 PM
  #71  
Tech Elite
 
token's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 4,644
Default

Originally Posted by Kewlbug
Well, I'm just throwing ideas out there. Those seem to be the major differences to me over the old car (As well as changing all the suspension geometry). Hopefully setup changes will get the car up to speed.
Up to Speed? Reno did qualify 6th overall with a BRAND NEW car. I do believe if he didn't flame out he would have finished top 5. I think you are panicking a bit for a car that has not been released yet.... Im currently running the 4.0 with the tuning chassis and alum rear brace and kingheadz extended motor mounts...With the evo springs the car is dialed on rough tracks..


token is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 02:58 PM
  #72  
Tech Elite
 
token's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 4,644
Default

For me the major difference is the shock package, the radio tray, the gearboxes and center diff, straighting out the drive train, steering rack, adjustable arms with F/R shock locations. And of course the most asked for thing on the 8ight series of cars - METRIC HARDWARE....... ijs
token is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 04:27 PM
  #73  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (63)
 
Kewlbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 450
Trader Rating: 63 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by token
For me the major difference is the shock package, the radio tray, the gearboxes and center diff, straighting out the drive train, steering rack, adjustable arms with F/R shock locations. And of course the most asked for thing on the 8ight series of cars - METRIC HARDWARE....... ijs
Those are all obvious improvements. I am talking about changes that may or may not have helped the car performance wise. What kind of screws it uses is irrelevant in this case.
Kewlbug is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 04:33 PM
  #74  
Tech Master
iTrader: (46)
 
kaptain crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: York PA.
Posts: 1,494
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by token
Up to Speed? Reno did qualify 6th overall with a BRAND NEW car. I do believe if he didn't flame out he would have finished top 5. I think you are panicking a bit for a car that has not been released yet.... Im currently running the 4.0 with the tuning chassis and alum rear brace and kingheadz extended motor mounts...With the evo springs the car is dialed on rough tracks..
I'm really liking the new buggy, lot of changes for the better. But sad about one thing...no universals ....out of the box stock. Most buggy's have them as stock. The K car, H B's, Tekno, XRAY, SWorkz, even...The Car...lol. Hate to spend $650 and have to add another $100+ to run universals...most tracks are bumpy here in the states.
token likes this.
kaptain crash is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:51 PM
  #75  
ASA
Tech Adept
 
ASA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Te Aroha, New Zealand
Posts: 219
Default

+1 on that......very surprised not to see u-joints on it....also I think it does require the longer rear brace and extended engine mount as it is now a 3mm chassis and the throttle/brake servo is floating meaning there is no full length radio tray to help stiffen the chassis behind the centre area.
token likes this.
ASA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.