Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree26Likes

3 racing new F1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2013, 09:25 AM
  #4186  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Nuno Gancho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 426
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

What to do if not enough steering?
What springs do you use in the IFS the original ones looks to hard!
Nuno Gancho is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 10:27 AM
  #4187  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Nuno Gancho
What to do if not enough steering?
What springs do you use in the IFS the original ones looks to hard!
try raise rear ride height, put some weight into the front, maybe set some drag brake, and (if you don't like drag brake like me) brake a bit when entering the corners.
*sauce the whole front wheel, and a bit of rear wheel.
original IFS spring isn't that hard, I just ended up removing all the spacers from it, the front ride height is around 4.5mm, but since it's rear wheel brake, it's fine (chassis won't scratch the ground).
nicholasxuu is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 06:01 PM
  #4188  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,596
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gsxr0311
has anybody tried the pardus tires for the fgx? my guess is that they are for carpet because the are the spec tire for the iic. any comments?
I've tried them on asphalt. Decent tires but no match for Pit, HPI tires, etc.

Good as spec tire, cheap and long lasting.
rccartips is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 09:45 PM
  #4189  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

I got the exotek IFS LOWER BRACE PLATE.


Why is that ball stud holes not a round hole? I found my plastic lower bulkhead is not yet broken, but (one of them) stripped. The ball stud is wobbling and easy to falling off.
Put the plate one, doesn't help that much.


Why not let the plate tighten the ball stud right at that horizontal location? and let the plastic bulkhead hold it vertically?
nicholasxuu is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 02:21 AM
  #4190  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

it isn't round because the lower plate mounts aren't round. They are oblong with inserts to change the camber if the front suspension by widening or narrowing the lower arms. Because of this they are slotted to allow for all the different adjustment there. However the balls should thread in straight so you might want to double check that everything is lined up properly.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 07:41 AM
  #4191  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,136
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default Plate

Originally Posted by nicholasxuu
I got the exotek IFS LOWER BRACE PLATE.


Why is that ball stud holes not a round hole? I found my plastic lower bulkhead is not yet broken, but (one of them) stripped. The ball stud is wobbling and easy to falling off.
Put the plate one, doesn't help that much.


Why not let the plate tighten the ball stud right at that horizontal location? and let the plastic bulkhead hold it vertically?

I agree with you. I have been working with the FGX since it came out and tried the IFS as soon as it was available also.

My first failure on the IFS front end was not the plastic breaking but the ballstud bending. It was suggested to use flat head screws from the top with thread on balls. This helped but a hard crash then broke the plastic.

I made a replacement for the ballstud mount from aluminum to not only be stronger but hold the ball mounts vertical. Worked well, until I broke the lower a-arm!!! But, that's what always happens when you strengthen a weak link!

The chamber adjusting inserts are not required when using the adjustable uppers anyway....

Ned
aarcobra is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 10:14 AM
  #4192  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt
it isn't round because the lower plate mounts aren't round. They are oblong with inserts to change the camber if the front suspension by widening or narrowing the lower arms. Because of this they are slotted to allow for all the different adjustment there. However the balls should thread in straight so you might want to double check that everything is lined up properly.
forgot the insert thing, though as exotek upgrader, I do have the adjustable upper arm, and the adjustable insert doesn't matters to me.
I'd prefer exotek to make that whole round and probably tight, and tell me to use specified insert to fit.

good new is that I've probably only stripped the insert, I can change a new one in spares, and go out with confidence again.

I've used the IFS for less than 20 mins, and maybe had a soft crash in the end of one race, and it's already stripped, and almost falling out.
(the black car following the white/blue car: http://youtu.be/_fjoNsesM-k?t=6m56s )
nicholasxuu is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 10:34 AM
  #4193  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 14
Default

Looks sweet.
Matt87 is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 10:44 AM
  #4194  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by aarcobra
I agree with you. I have been working with the FGX since it came out and tried the IFS as soon as it was available also.

My first failure on the IFS front end was not the plastic breaking but the ballstud bending. It was suggested to use flat head screws from the top with thread on balls. This helped but a hard crash then broke the plastic.

I made a replacement for the ballstud mount from aluminum to not only be stronger but hold the ball mounts vertical. Worked well, until I broke the lower a-arm!!! But, that's what always happens when you strengthen a weak link!

The chamber adjusting inserts are not required when using the adjustable uppers anyway....

Ned
I knew fgx is never a strong car, so I'm not going competitive with it.
I'm taking it as a fun class, running it, under control, and don't want to give a hard fight, definitely no contact.

Good thing is that almost everyone is taking F1 class as a fun class. (top 2 guys are always there so a lot faster, but they've always been that fast, and they are probably taking it as a fun class as well).

problem is the car doesn't seem to stand this very well, which is sad.

----

good idea on screw + ball stud.
nicholasxuu is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:22 AM
  #4195  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,136
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default FGX

Originally Posted by nicholasxuu
I knew fgx is never a strong car, so I'm not going competitive with it.
I'm taking it as a fun class, running it, under control, and don't want to give a hard fight, definitely no contact.

Good thing is that almost everyone is taking F1 class as a fun class. (top 2 guys are always there so a lot faster, but they've always been that fast, and they are probably taking it as a fun class as well).

problem is the car doesn't seem to stand this very well, which is sad.

----

good idea on screw + ball stud.
It's a really neat car and again I agree with you that it's a fun class and I'm happy as long as I can race with a few others.

Recently I went to a UF1 Midwest race in Toledo, OH, I'm in South Carolina. The first day I ran a TRG car and had a blast! Although I qualified in the "C" group (1st!) I had close races with a few guys and had to come from the back alot. One pretty fast guy didn't qualify, and was GONE!

On Sunday I ran the FGX, full independent, and qualified within a tenth or two, although it felt slower. Before the race even started I ran in the rear of a car stopped at the end of the front straight and although the car seemed ok, the lower a-arm broke a few laps in...

No F1 around here, hope to be able to run it back up North some this summer!

Ned
aarcobra is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 01:28 PM
  #4196  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

thanks to accobra, I've just changed to use screw + ball stud as well.

reason: with exotek plate on, stock ball stud has 1mm less thread into the insert, making it even easier to strip the insert. (it was already easy to strip).

things used:
3racing 4.8mm hex ball stud
durango droop screws (screw with smallest head I can find).



durango droop screw's head make it as no taller than the flat area.



To fit better, need to remove a bit of these areas to avoid the screw.



Put ball studs on, just at the correct length (perfect with exotek 1mm plate)



there's already a hex between the bulkhead and the plate, just adding another one to secure the plate in place. (optional for this mod, but with the stock ball stud, an extra point to secure the plate in place is helpful).



Overall result of IFS.


*with exotek's plate design, I'd recommend use #1 or #2 inserts in the front, and #0 inserts in the rear.
when there's a front facing crash, exotek plate will contribute more on this configuration.
nicholasxuu is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 01:42 PM
  #4197  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,136
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default Nice Job!

Originally Posted by nicholasxuu
thanks to accobra, I've just changed to use screw + ball stud as well.

reason: with exotek plate on, stock ball stud has 1mm less thread into the insert, making it even easier to strip the insert. (it was already easy to strip).

things used:
3racing 4.8mm hex ball stud
durango droop screws (screw with smallest head I can find).



durango droop screw's head make it as no taller than the flat area.



To fit better, need to remove a bit of these areas to avoid the screw.



Put ball studs on, just at the correct length (perfect with exotek 1mm plate)



there's already a hex between the bulkhead and the plate, just adding another one to secure the plate in place. (optional for this mod, but with the stock ball stud, an extra point to secure the plate in place is helpful).



Overall result of IFS.


*with exotek's plate design, I'd recommend use #1 or #2 inserts in the front, and #0 inserts in the rear.
when there's a front facing crash, exotek plate will contribute more on this configuration.
Looks good! Thanks for the pics! Nutdriver suggested the mod with the screws. Wish I would have thought of it sooner!!

I think you are correct about insert orientation, it should help get more support under the ball in the direction it will be stresssed in.
aarcobra is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 02:39 AM
  #4198  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Countersink the plastic spacer and you should get a really flush setup. I might just try that myself.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 03:27 AM
  #4199  
Tech Apprentice
 
Zedsispeho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Les clayes sous bois, France
Posts: 71
Default

Hi,
I am just wondering if it would not be interesting to make the holes from the exotek plate even wider thant they currently are?
That way you could screw the ball studs all the way but the plastic inserts would still be reinforced by the exotek plate.
Zedsispeho is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 10:27 AM
  #4200  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt
Countersink the plastic spacer and you should get a really flush setup. I might just try that myself.
Thought about that, the problem are:
1. there's limited amount of inserts in a package, you need another set of IFS kit if you messed up and want more.
2. the inserts are only 2mm thick, countersunk 1mm out of it, there will be (at most) 1mm of plastic holding the whole point . easier to get the hole extended and make the part come lose.
nicholasxuu is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.