Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)
#3377
Tech Rookie
Hello,
Can you tell me the difference between the chassis L and the EX on the track ? The EX is it more stable and easier to drive?
Thank you for your answers.
Can you tell me the difference between the chassis L and the EX on the track ? The EX is it more stable and easier to drive?
Thank you for your answers.
#3378
Tech Rookie
Hello,
Can you tell me the difference between the chassis L and the EX on the track ? The EX is it more stable and easier to drive?
Thank you for your answers.
Can you tell me the difference between the chassis L and the EX on the track ? The EX is it more stable and easier to drive?
Thank you for your answers.
#3379
Tech Adept
From FreddySudhoff:
Both are working well. The L chassis is the narrow one, with the new flex option but you can only run std. Motor layout north/ south. It has little bit more steering and change of load is perfekt.
The EX chassis is little bit wider, has also the new flex options but you can use the transverse motor kit. The chassis has a lot traction and is very easy to drive.
So, L has less rear traction, but good and very fast reaction and EX chassis is maximum easy to drive and very smooth.
All the stock guys at ETS used the L chassis with soft flex settings.
Both are working well. The L chassis is the narrow one, with the new flex option but you can only run std. Motor layout north/ south. It has little bit more steering and change of load is perfekt.
The EX chassis is little bit wider, has also the new flex options but you can use the transverse motor kit. The chassis has a lot traction and is very easy to drive.
So, L has less rear traction, but good and very fast reaction and EX chassis is maximum easy to drive and very smooth.
All the stock guys at ETS used the L chassis with soft flex settings.
#3380
This is a good resource for the A700 - http://racerlog.com/wiki/Awesomatix_A700#Current_Models
With my cars on the track with identical settings - the case usually comes down type of powerplant/class.
The L feels like it is more free and nimble than the EX with 17.5 blinky. The EX feels more at home in 13.5/10.5/mod trim - stability and cornerspeed.
IMO - the EX will provide a larger range of tuning options and provide a better range of drivability irrespective of power options.
With my cars on the track with identical settings - the case usually comes down type of powerplant/class.
The L feels like it is more free and nimble than the EX with 17.5 blinky. The EX feels more at home in 13.5/10.5/mod trim - stability and cornerspeed.
IMO - the EX will provide a larger range of tuning options and provide a better range of drivability irrespective of power options.
#3384
Tech Initiate
Hello to all, i want to know if someone can hang on youtube how you make for exmple tweak, ride hight, etc, so we can share the way we make our setup.
Sorry about my english.
Thanks
Christian
Sorry about my english.
Thanks
Christian
#3385
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
im try two setup styles this weekend outdoors on asphalt/Jackson RC -- super low roll center, and a 2.5mm higher than super low roll center setup. both setups will leverage the AM06S hubs. i hand made some AT21S balls for the low roll center car, and i'm putting 2mm under the AT21 balls that hold the C04 on the high roll center car.
#3386
I just tried the same. With AM06S. I assume you used the rcrollcentre calculator. I think its important to use the calculator to keep control over the camber change or you won't be able to ascertain which variables are responsible for the change in feel of the car.
#3388
Try it. Its been a really valuable insight. You never know eh
#3389
Where's the roll center calculator?
#3390
Tech Addict