Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Magic E4 Thread >

Team Magic E4 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Magic E4 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2011 | 08:32 PM
  #3661  
Jochim_18's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,474
From: CENCAL
Default

Box setup is really good with this car... E4 FS like less rear lower roll center while E4 RS like more lower roll center other than that run the car with basic setup.
Jochim_18 is offline  
Old 02-14-2011 | 09:53 PM
  #3662  
YoDog's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,002
From: Gilroy, Ca.
Default

Hi all, I made some tweaks to the chassis model. What do you think?
I got a quote on getting them made but it's not good news. Sure they can make them but the price is out there and I can't fork out the kind of cash needed to have them made outside. I hope to have a couple of chassis cut in the next few weeks for testing and if all goes well, maybe I can find another shop to cut them at a far better price.
Notice the cutouts for the battery humps and the taper from the main body to the bulkhead locations are symmetrical. This should make chassis flex more consistent from front to rear.
Attached Thumbnails Team Magic E4 Thread-new-chassis-plate.jpg   Team Magic E4 Thread-new-chassis-plate-bottom.jpg  

Last edited by YoDog; 02-14-2011 at 10:06 PM.
YoDog is offline  
Old 02-14-2011 | 10:12 PM
  #3663  
Jochim_18's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,474
From: CENCAL
Default

Looks good Rick...
Jochim_18 is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 01:32 AM
  #3664  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 180
From: Germany
Default

I think it is a very good solution, it will give you more flex at the rear.
SebO is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 05:14 AM
  #3665  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
From: N. Ireland, UK
Default

I'm hoping to use this new chassis on a E4JS - what would I need to make that work?
colmo is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 07:32 AM
  #3666  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,377
From: NY/FL
Default

Originally Posted by YoDog
Hi all, I made some tweaks to the chassis model. What do you think?
I got a quote on getting them made but it's not good news. Sure they can make them but the price is out there and I can't fork out the kind of cash needed to have them made outside. I hope to have a couple of chassis cut in the next few weeks for testing and if all goes well, maybe I can find another shop to cut them at a far better price.
Notice the cutouts for the battery humps and the taper from the main body to the bulkhead locations are symmetrical. This should make chassis flex more consistent from front to rear.
I'm just curious but Is it necessary to build out of carbon fiber ? And why ??
I know it has some good structural qualities but couldn't FRP or some other material be used that would be significantly less expensive to produce and offer similar traits ?
Evoracer is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 09:14 AM
  #3667  
YoDog's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,002
From: Gilroy, Ca.
Default

Originally Posted by Evoracer
I'm just curious but Is it necessary to build out of carbon fiber ? And why ??
I know it has some good structural qualities but couldn't FRP or some other material be used that would be significantly less expensive to produce and offer similar traits ?
FRP could work just fine but it is not as light weight and rigid as the carbon. The price of the carbon is not so much the issue as it is the machine setup and cost per part for so few pieces being made. If I were making 100 chassis then it might be reasonable per part but we're only talking about 10 pieces or so.

As far as the JS model goes, I don't currently have one so I really can't comment on whether or not my chassis will work with it.
YoDog is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 12:49 PM
  #3668  
Marcos.J's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (241)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 33,399
From: Semper Fi
Default

Originally Posted by YoDog
Hi all, I made some tweaks to the chassis model. What do you think?
I got a quote on getting them made but it's not good news. Sure they can make them but the price is out there and I can't fork out the kind of cash needed to have them made outside. I hope to have a couple of chassis cut in the next few weeks for testing and if all goes well, maybe I can find another shop to cut them at a far better price.
Notice the cutouts for the battery humps and the taper from the main body to the bulkhead locations are symmetrical. This should make chassis flex more consistent from front to rear.
Have you tried contacting Jason at Bmi ??
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 01:42 PM
  #3669  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,377
From: NY/FL
Default

Dumb question time. Still trying to understand the parts a bit better and somehow I missed this. As i understand, the stock rear arms on the FS have 1 degree of toe built in...correct ?? So the rear pivot block gives you what degree toe in each position of the cap?? I've seen 1.5 and 2.5 shown on setup sheets. is that including the 1 degree at the arms ? And what happens if you use the JS arms I've seen mention of? And on that...how do you tell the difference between the available arms ? I've copied some of Marcos's setups and notice he used 3 degrees regularly so I'm betting that between the arm, block and the optional 1.5 upright...that gives 3 degrees of toe in. Thanks all.
Evoracer is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 02:36 PM
  #3670  
YoDog's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,002
From: Gilroy, Ca.
Default

Originally Posted by Marcos.J
Have you tried contacting Jason at Bmi ??
Yup, that's where I got my primary quote.
At roughly $90 cost each I would have to charge about $130 each just to make it worth my while. Besides, I don't have an extra $900 to front the cost of having 10 chassis made.
I will try to talk our machinist into cutting them for us or at least program the mill for me to run them through myself.
I'm not opposed to designing the parts if someone else wants to produce them. It's just hard to get a shop to drop the jobs they have in the pipeline for such a small project. for them, time is definitely $money$.
YoDog is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 08:33 PM
  #3671  
Jochim_18's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,474
From: CENCAL
Default

If you are running rubber tires don't use the FS arm you will not get the proper ride height. I will stick with the stock setup I found out having the rear toe in more than 2.5 it's make the rear a little loose cause the car generates too much steering.. Try putting 0.5 mm toe-in on the front and 2.5 mm rear toe-in with this setup the car is very easy too drive...

Originally Posted by Evoracer
Dumb question time. Still trying to understand the parts a bit better and somehow I missed this. As i understand, the stock rear arms on the FS have 1 degree of toe built in...correct ?? So the rear pivot block gives you what degree toe in each position of the cap?? I've seen 1.5 and 2.5 shown on setup sheets. is that including the 1 degree at the arms ? And what happens if you use the JS arms I've seen mention of? And on that...how do you tell the difference between the available arms ? I've copied some of Marcos's setups and notice he used 3 degrees regularly so I'm betting that between the arm, block and the optional 1.5 upright...that gives 3 degrees of toe in. Thanks all.
Jochim_18 is offline  
Old 02-15-2011 | 08:38 PM
  #3672  
Jochim_18's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,474
From: CENCAL
Default

Evoracer,

All the E4 arms are exactly the same except for the FS... FS gives you 1 degree of toe-in and the mounting hole for the shocks is higher this is specifically design for foam tires which as we all know foam tire diameter is smaller when trued down...
Jochim_18 is offline  
Old 02-16-2011 | 04:33 AM
  #3673  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,377
From: NY/FL
Default

Thanks for the help. Haven't seen the 2 arms together. Can anyone post a pic of the FS arm and a JS/RS arrm ?? To clarify the toe in....Ok, so the arms have 1 degree toe built in. When I adjust the cap on the rear toe block (hinge pin mount) either < > or > <, the toe is either 1.5 or 2.5 including the 1 degree at the arm.....correct ?? So the toe block adjustment is actually 1/2 degree or 1.5 degree by itself ?? The front block is the same ??

Sorry about my confusion. Aside from 200+ pages of thread info,is there a good reference site or something that clearly shows details such as these including the differences in some parts such as the FS arms vs. JS/RS arms ??
seems like it would really help clear up some things.
Evoracer is offline  
Old 02-16-2011 | 10:15 AM
  #3674  
Marcos.J's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (241)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 33,399
From: Semper Fi
Default

Originally Posted by Evoracer
I've copied some of Marcos's setups and notice he used 3 degrees regularly so I'm betting that between the arm, block and the optional 1.5 upright...that gives 3 degrees of toe in. Thanks all.
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 02-16-2011 | 10:25 AM
  #3675  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,377
From: NY/FL
Default

Short but sweet Thanks Marcos !!
Evoracer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.