Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy >

Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree66Likes

Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2017, 08:02 AM
  #11071  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

something I have tried based on some suggestions was just to fill the hole with JB weld and that worked as well from what I am seeing, no tooth picks at all.

One reason I am looking also at the 3 x 1.3 holes is that the oils needed get back more into the range of what I have on hand. Some setups when you convert to PT Racing oils are darn near 1000 cst up front with 2 x 1.6 holes.
Cain is offline  
Old 02-22-2017, 09:18 AM
  #11072  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
DWheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tekin HQ
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Cain, what setup are you looking at? 1000cst or 70wt with 2x1.6 has a pretty high pack. The highest I have seen or heard is 60wt or 900cst with 2x1.6 for a small tight carpet track that has small jumps.
What cst do you have to run to achieve the same pack with 3x1.3?

Last edited by DWheels; 02-22-2017 at 10:06 AM.
DWheels is offline  
Old 02-22-2017, 11:25 AM
  #11073  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DWheels
Cain, what setup are you looking at? 1000cst or 70wt with 2x1.6 has a pretty high pack. The highest I have seen or heard is 60wt or 900cst with 2x1.6 for a small tight carpet track that has small jumps.
What cst do you have to run to achieve the same pack with 3x1.3?
this one in particular:

HB Racing D4'13 - David Ronnefalk - DHI Cup - Odense - 06-08.01.2017

I run on a small tight indoor carpet track that has some bumpy sections, no monster jumps.

As for what cst to run, offhand don't know as I don't know of a conversion chart out there to use in comparison.

I am planning to start with whatever is the equivalent of 40W front and 35W rear, possibly Losi oil, maybe 50cst less in general. when I get a chance will compare with the setup I have on the vehicle right now. Its kind of a combo of Tys starting slick tire setup and the one I linked.

I am also running the ESC and motor in basically stock shorty positions (ESC up front, motor towards back to balance shorty). The setup I listed uses the motor up front, and I think is using the exotek chassis too (which I have).

what I have on hand goes from a range of 300cst to 750cst by 50cst increments.
Cain is offline  
Old 02-26-2017, 11:45 PM
  #11074  
Tech Addict
 
nanoverse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 650
Default

Ronnefalk uses the aluminium RedWorkshop +4 chassis. I am using the carbon one from Red and have to say that the latest DHI setup is much better than my own setup has ever been. Also have the three hole pistons not the two holes.
nanoverse is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 08:28 AM
  #11075  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

installed the VRP 3 x 1.3 pistons all around. From memory I think I went with 600cst up front and 450cst on the rear, PT Racing oils.

I am doing my setup as close as possible to the last carpet setup from Ronnefalk that i mentioned, within reason as I am not doing the motor up front.

I do like the exotek chassis, however, I think they need to take advantage of what it offers and sell a split center diff mount or something similar (say inserts that come down from top that sandwich in the diff like durango's dex410v5 setup). I think that would really take advantage of the layout as then you can pull the center diff without messing with the screws underneath or fighting with getting the center bones lined up properly.

I don't mind the front and rear diffs so much, those once you get used to it aren't so bad to get too but the center is more of a pain.

Also, on the rear for the camber link positions on the rear "brace", is there an easy way to adjust this? I find I need to take apart the rear tower location to remove the deck the studs mount to. Even if it was say ball studs that could be held still with the included wrenches that would be most helpful. Or, should I just use an L wrench?

Oh, and it was fun to put in 1 million fluid weight lol. Definitely like putty.

So the D413 is ready for battle again, hopefully this Saturday.

By the way, exotek mentioned that a 1.6mm pin is the size I shoudl look for to have a better fit in the clamping front hexes. Anyone know of an 1.6mm diameter pins to buy?

Last edited by Cain; 02-27-2017 at 12:14 PM.
Cain is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 12:26 PM
  #11076  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In a VAN down by the RIVER
Posts: 805
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Schumacher SCHU4390
Sofa King is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 04:44 PM
  #11077  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 247
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default D 413

It may be on here somewhere but what would a good set up be for a smooth hard packed indoor dirt track be it is a good flowing track traction is usually medium to high when wet they run slicks when dry with a little dust they run dirt webs will be running a shorty with a 6.5
Tas4 is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 06:27 PM
  #11078  
Tech Prophet
 
tc5 man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 16,997
Default

I run on the same kind of track traction wise but with bar type treaded tires . Well it was my first time running this buggy yesterday so I'm still testing things on it.

But heres what i ran 21mm ride height with 3x1.3 pistons 37w/35w camber at 1/2 degree and some toe out up front and the front camber link on the tower in the inside hole everything else is stock . You will likely want to limit the droop because its to much of it tons of body body roll/weight transfer and calm down the aggressive turn in .
tc5 man is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 06:28 AM
  #11079  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc5 man
I run on the same kind of track traction wise but with bar type treaded tires . Well it was my first time running this buggy yesterday so I'm still testing things on it.

But heres what i ran 21mm ride height with 3x1.3 pistons 37w/35w camber at 1/2 degree and some toe out up front and the front camber link on the tower in the inside hole everything else is stock . You will likely want to limit the droop because its to much of it tons of body body roll/weight transfer and calm down the aggressive turn in .
droop limiting was one thing I found interesting on some of the carpet setups I looked at that some only had some limiting say on the front, none on the rear.

how did you like the piston setup?
Cain is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 07:50 AM
  #11080  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
DWheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tekin HQ
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Cain, VRP pistions are the way to go, they definitely give an advantage. And I also run the Exotek chassis, while the center diff isn't split for easy changing, I find it much easier than the stock chassis to pull the center diff, due to the lack of top decks.

TC5 man is right, this buggy does have a lot of body roll. So I always run limiters in the shock bodies. Typically 2mm limiters up front and 1-2mm in the rear depending on how rough a track is. And then also adjust the shock eyelet to hide all the lines or expose just 1 of the lines, (up travel).

Tas4, on a good smooth flowing track I'd would be starting with a 2 hole piston setup. A higher amount of anti-squat and black sway bars wouldn't hurt either.
DWheels is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 08:38 AM
  #11081  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DWheels
Cain, VRP pistions are the way to go, they definitely give an advantage. And I also run the Exotek chassis, while the center diff isn't split for easy changing, I find it much easier than the stock chassis to pull the center diff, due to the lack of top decks.

TC5 man is right, this buggy does have a lot of body roll. So I always run limiters in the shock bodies. Typically 2mm limiters up front and 1-2mm in the rear depending on how rough a track is. And then also adjust the shock eyelet to hide all the lines or expose just 1 of the lines, (up travel).

Tas4, on a good smooth flowing track I'd would be starting with a 2 hole piston setup. A higher amount of anti-squat and black sway bars wouldn't hurt either.
Good info. I got the VRP installed so excited to see what they can do.

I agree the Exotek chassis is definitely an improvement, I just hope that Exotek can take another look at the vehicle and see about improving the center diff access as that is pretty much my only real issue with maintenance on the car that I feel could be done much better.

Running eyelets fully threaded here. The car definitely feels like it was setup to be a beast outdoors with the amount of shock travel etc. Not saying it won't be indoors, just some interesting things seen.

Have you heard anything about any specific new parts that we may see in the future like the center slipper setup?
Cain is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 09:48 AM
  #11082  
Tech Prophet
 
tc5 man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 16,997
Default

Originally Posted by DWheels
Cain, VRP pistions are the way to go, they definitely give an advantage. And I also run the Exotek chassis, while the center diff isn't split for easy changing, I find it much easier than the stock chassis to pull the center diff, due to the lack of top decks.

TC5 man is right, this buggy does have a lot of body roll. So I always run limiters in the shock bodies. Typically 2mm limiters up front and 1-2mm in the rear depending on how rough a track is. And then also adjust the shock eyelet to hide all the lines or expose just 1 of the lines, (up travel).

Tas4, on a good smooth flowing track I'd would be starting with a 2 hole piston setup. A higher amount of anti-squat and black sway bars wouldn't hurt either.




I try limiting the droop with the shock rod ends treading them to the 1 line first thinking that would help with the pitching also and cut down on the aggressive turn in . I been running 2wd buggy mod buggy so it took me a bit to get used to 4wd buggy .


Cain : I dint run the 4 hole pistions so its hard to say if the 3 hole was better on not but it landed good even over clearing a triple jump dint hear any slapping dint bounce to much . But I'm running 37/35 Associated oils with stock diff oil setup.
tc5 man is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 10:35 AM
  #11083  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
DWheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tekin HQ
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc5 man
I try limiting the droop with the shock rod ends treading them to the 1 line first thinking that would help with the pitching also and cut down on the aggressive turn in . I been running 2wd buggy mod buggy so it took me a bit to get used to 4wd buggy .
What does your front end setup look like? (Ackermann/camber link)?
DWheels is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 10:37 AM
  #11084  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
DWheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tekin HQ
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cain
Have you heard anything about any specific new parts that we may see in the future like the center slipper setup?
I haven't heard anything regarding a center slipper....though it would be nice for those higher traction applications.
DWheels is offline  
Old 02-28-2017, 10:49 AM
  #11085  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc5 man
...
Cain : I dint run the 4 hole pistions so its hard to say if the 3 hole was better on not but it landed good even over clearing a triple jump dint hear any slapping dint bounce to much . But I'm running 37/35 Associated oils with stock diff oil setup.
lol same here. I went with 2 holes front and rear before going to the 3 holes. So will see how it goes. My oils may be close in conversion factor to yours.

Originally Posted by DWheels
I haven't heard anything regarding a center slipper....though it would be nice for those higher traction applications.
+1. I recall that Tessman had a prototype one I believe so hopefully they can get some of those parts out there.

I will say, I do miss being able to adjust droop via screws. It was a nice touch that the durango vehicles have.
Cain is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.