Team Associated B4.2 Thread
#4847
#4848
#4849
Yeah 0 toe in front. Do you have any weight up front? I'm running 1/2 oz right in front of the servo, Steve and Tony I believe are running a full oz in front of the servo. 35 wt in the rear might be a little thick with the 1.6. Tony runs 37.5/35wt with the 1.7 piston. I'm at 32.5/30 with the 1.5x1.1 avids.
#4850
yeah, Javier told me he didnt show till saturday. I dont know why he came at all if he was going to put in no effort. I am pulling for Hartson and Maifield in the worlds. I like Maifield's paint job better than Cav's anyway, lol.
#4855
#4856
They say the X car was built for US dirt track mid motor. There are a few locals that swear by the X cars, but everyone that tried Mid motor durango, Losi, K car or anything besides X car, hated it. I think one guy ran the Shumacher Mid and said it was ok. But in general, RM for the US is best. It seems motors run much hotter in a MM config also, because the body reduces motor airflow. You can always ventilate the body though.
#4858
The cars with the option of mid motor versus rear motor from what I have seen definitely needed a more high traction surface to get the most out of them which looking at what WC runs on compared to what I run on during the summer, its interesting that they are switching back.
But maybe that is where xfactory has it right, a design that is designed from the ground up as pure mid motor versus one that converts from one to the other.
http://www.xfactoryrc.com/rc/News/2013-02-06.php
Overseas no USA, sorry if I gave that impression. A good reflection on AE as for all the platforms out there, they previous squared buggy used the B4 as a base.
But maybe that is where xfactory has it right, a design that is designed from the ground up as pure mid motor versus one that converts from one to the other.
http://www.xfactoryrc.com/rc/News/2013-02-06.php
Overseas no USA, sorry if I gave that impression. A good reflection on AE as for all the platforms out there, they previous squared buggy used the B4 as a base.
#4859
it has a similar change as adding washers inside, but more dramatic. it will help to make the rear more planted and take away steering. Most of the time, we just add 1-2 washers inside. if you find yourself needing 3-4 washers, then a longer link might be needed.
#4860
The cars with the option of mid motor versus rear motor from what I have seen definitely needed a more high traction surface to get the most out of them which looking at what WC runs on compared to what I run on during the summer, its interesting that they are switching back.
But maybe that is where xfactory has it right, a design that is designed from the ground up as pure mid motor versus one that converts from one to the other.
http://www.xfactoryrc.com/rc/News/2013-02-06.php
Overseas no USA, sorry if I gave that impression. A good reflection on AE as for all the platforms out there, they previous squared buggy used the B4 as a base.
But maybe that is where xfactory has it right, a design that is designed from the ground up as pure mid motor versus one that converts from one to the other.
http://www.xfactoryrc.com/rc/News/2013-02-06.php
Overseas no USA, sorry if I gave that impression. A good reflection on AE as for all the platforms out there, they previous squared buggy used the B4 as a base.
I've ran against Paul for probly going on 15 years... I'll say this: thy do mid motor like no one else... Period! They have it figured out. That car in mid
has a ton of grip and steering. It has absolutely everything to do with the fact it's not a convertible car.



4Likes



