Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno RC EB48 Thread >

Tekno RC EB48 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

Tekno RC EB48 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2015 | 11:22 PM
  #14641  
werner sline's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,996
Default

Originally Posted by Dragonfueled
I've been bashing my 48.2 for a while now it's great. I use a castle 2400 short course motor with a fan on 4 s and it's awesome. Yes it breaks but you really gotta almost be trying to hurt it lol. I put the shorter wing mount on and it helped allot with ugly landings on the wing.
what did you break ?
werner sline is offline  
Old 05-02-2015 | 04:38 AM
  #14642  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 365
Default

Was breaking the rear diff case where the wing mounts but they fixed that.
Now once in a blue moon on a really bad landing I'll snap an a arm but it's gotta basically land sideways from a huge jump to do it. I get away with that a few times before it snaps. It's a tough buggy! I just ordered a 410 for my son. His slash 4x4 breaks every time we run so I'm hoping the 410 and my eb48 gives us a few hours of bashing instead of fixing lol.
Dragonfueled is offline  
Old 05-03-2015 | 10:51 AM
  #14643  
justpoet's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,063
From: NH, USA
Default

The important parts to upgrade from the very original to the V2 for bashing would be to get the 4 extra tough arms. They were optional on the original, and the .2 came with them, making the lighter weight original arms the option instead.

The rear transmission housing I would consider an option. It straightens the driveline for less wear in the back, and gives the larger bearing, but I've never had problems with the originals and I raced them for years multiple times a week. Having a spare on hand is not bad, especially if you do a lot of wing first landings (this is one type of crash I very rarely do...though I certainly crash plenty in other ways).

In all cases, get an aluminum servo horn if your servo doesn't come with one.

Lastly, since you mentioned an SCT410 for your kid, if you're just bashing all the time, consider grabbing the M2C 17mm hex conversion for the SCT410, allowing you to run normal eBuggy tires so you can share. They're slightly larger in diameter so you may need to mount a body higher, but the M2C keeps the same offset so you should be ok otherwise. Don't use the Tekno ones for the SC, they make it wider like a buggy and then bodies won't fit as the wheels will stick out the sides.
justpoet is offline  
Old 05-04-2015 | 08:57 AM
  #14644  
wittyname's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,884
From: Hampton Roads
Default

Share your thoughts on this ... Right now I have a buggy that has fioroni pistons and X ray progressive springs on it . I had these on my old buggy and liked them so much I just carried them over to the new car . I have a great setup on the car from a local team driver with the exception of these parts. My car is unstable when the chassis gets upset, kicks up, or lands funny . It just kind of dances around until you either crash or work it out . I want to switch over to a all linear set up , and I have the springs and oils etc that were originally used in the set up I was given . I do not have the 6 x 1.5 pistons. I DO have Blue csi pistons in my et48 and thought about trying those before I went $25 lighter in the wallet just to test something . Anyone have experience comparing the blue csi pistons to the 6x1.5 tekno pistons ? Will they be so different its not really a good test ?
wittyname is offline  
Old 05-04-2015 | 09:35 AM
  #14645  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,595
From: Covington, La.
Default

Originally Posted by wittyname
Share your thoughts on this ... Right now I have a buggy that has fioroni pistons and X ray progressive springs on it . I had these on my old buggy and liked them so much I just carried them over to the new car . I have a great setup on the car from a local team driver with the exception of these parts. My car is unstable when the chassis gets upset, kicks up, or lands funny . It just kind of dances around until you either crash or work it out . I want to switch over to a all linear set up , and I have the springs and oils etc that were originally used in the set up I was given . I do not have the 6 x 1.5 pistons. I DO have Blue csi pistons in my et48 and thought about trying those before I went $25 lighter in the wallet just to test something . Anyone have experience comparing the blue csi pistons to the 6x1.5 tekno pistons ? Will they be so different its not really a good test ?
I would spend the money and get the proper pistons. They really make the car very stable.
micrors4guy is offline  
Old 05-04-2015 | 10:23 AM
  #14646  
lala4fire's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 278
From: Meridian, Idaho
Default

6x1.5 pistons
Front:37.5 wt oil w/ pink springs
Rear: 30.0 wt oil w/ red springs
"It just works!!"
lala4fire is offline  
Old 05-04-2015 | 11:41 AM
  #14647  
dirtbikekid33's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by micrors4guy
I would spend the money and get the proper pistons. They really make the car very stable.
I have the csi and a team driver told me to dump them and get the 6x1.5 to get This.
dirtbikekid33 is offline  
Old 05-04-2015 | 06:14 PM
  #14648  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,025
From: The 561
Default

I run blue csi pistons and love the way the buggy feels
Hinecken is offline  
Old 05-05-2015 | 03:02 PM
  #14649  
jmkalt's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by lala4fire
6x1.5 pistons
Front:37.5 wt oil w/ pink springs
Rear: 30.0 wt oil w/ red springs
"It just works!!"
Sorry for the off-topic question (it's an SCT410 question but directly related), but do you know if this is a good combo for the '410 also? Aside from the pistons (I have been using 8x1.3) the rest of the setup you mention above is shockingly close to what I use. I'm wondering what the result would be keeping my springs and oils the same and just trying the 6x1.5).
jmkalt is offline  
Old 05-05-2015 | 05:38 PM
  #14650  
vandalzzz's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 762
From: somewhere near Japan
Default

Originally Posted by jmkalt
Sorry for the off-topic question (it's an SCT410 question but directly related), but do you know if this is a good combo for the '410 also? Aside from the pistons (I have been using 8x1.3) the rest of the setup you mention above is shockingly close to what I use. I'm wondering what the result would be keeping my springs and oils the same and just trying the 6x1.5).
8x1.3 piston' holes area is similar to 6x1.5 piston, so basically you can use same oils, but due to smaller holes diameter 8x1.3 gives you a bit more pack, so buggy gona land a bit better but handle rough sections a bit worse.
It's a good tuning math for me now, i have one set of 8x1.3 and one set of 6x1.5, also have NB with vented caps and EB with non-vented. Now i'm trying EB with 1.3 and non-vented caps, but thinking about switching caps with NB
vandalzzz is offline  
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:45 AM
  #14651  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 219
Default

What battery connector do you guys prefer on this buggy? Seen some info that says a deans isn't capable of carrying the necessary amount of current flow, etc, etc.

Just curious to hear some opinions and or data. First 1/8 scale so I'm a little in the dark.

Thanks in advance!
JJG690 is offline  
Old 05-07-2015 | 10:53 AM
  #14652  
FRONTI3R's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 342
From: Ottawa, ON
Default

Originally Posted by JJG690
What battery connector do you guys prefer on this buggy? Seen some info that says a deans isn't capable of carrying the necessary amount of current flow, etc, etc.

Just curious to hear some opinions and or data. First 1/8 scale so I'm a little in the dark.

Thanks in advance!
I prefer bullet connectors directly to the battery. But I didn't have that option two years ago when I got a 4s battery that came with deans connectors. Never had a problem with the deans on it yet.
FRONTI3R is offline  
Old 05-07-2015 | 11:14 AM
  #14653  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by FRONTI3R
I prefer bullet connectors directly to the battery. But I didn't have that option two years ago when I got a 4s battery that came with deans connectors. Never had a problem with the deans on it yet.
I prefer direct bullets as well, use them on all my other cars, just not a ton of battery options out there in that configuration for 1/8 scale is there?
JJG690 is offline  
Old 05-07-2015 | 01:28 PM
  #14654  
justpoet's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,063
From: NH, USA
Default

Deans work great as long as they're genuine deans and they're not worn out. If the connection starts feeling rather warm immediately after a run, it may be time to replace the connectors. Once my current set wears out, I'll be trying out the XT90s that I got, as they show just as low a resistance on my Fluke meter and should be easier to work with on the 10g wire.
justpoet is offline  
Old 05-07-2015 | 02:23 PM
  #14655  
Lowe's48's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,016
Default

Anyone looking for a brand new Tekno lite tapered front/ctr drive shaft For Eb48 or Et48? They are 10 grams lighter than stock!
Pls msg me
Lowe's48 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.