RC10B4/T4 Forum
#6736
I gear my 10.5 25/78 for a small, high grip indoor track.
#6737
Tech Master
iTrader: (37)
Try this for a 'lightweight set-up'
It should be very close to what BT and Pudge are using...
Last sheet I saw they had a slightly longer wheel base with 1/2* rear toe added on the hubs. Also a full length rear spring, but for the grip of my track, the cut spring stablized the car out a little more.
It should be very close to what BT and Pudge are using...
Last sheet I saw they had a slightly longer wheel base with 1/2* rear toe added on the hubs. Also a full length rear spring, but for the grip of my track, the cut spring stablized the car out a little more.
#6738
Doing this puts the spring between a standard black and a standard green spring.
#6739
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
I raced with the GT2 front arms on my T4 this past weekend. No changes in geometry observed and no issues with breaking them. Our 2WD class was a hack fest this past weekend too. One thing I like is the lack of spacers on the outer hinge pins, makes installing them even faster, and what's interesting is the tab that the shock mounts to is single on the GT2 arm, but double on the stock T4 arm. I'm not sure if there is a strength difference between the GT2 arm and the T4 plastic arm either. I used the GT2 outer pin, it worked fine.
#6740
Try this for a 'lightweight set-up'
It should be very close to what BT and Pudge are using...
Last sheet I saw they had a slightly longer wheel base with 1/2* rear toe added on the hubs. Also a full length rear spring, but for the grip of my track, the cut spring stablized the car out a little more.
The total car weight is 53.1 ounces. ROAR minimum is 52 ounces.
It should be very close to what BT and Pudge are using...
Last sheet I saw they had a slightly longer wheel base with 1/2* rear toe added on the hubs. Also a full length rear spring, but for the grip of my track, the cut spring stablized the car out a little more.
The total car weight is 53.1 ounces. ROAR minimum is 52 ounces.
-Are you guys adding any weight to the cars with this setup, other than to balance out the chassis left/right?
-Is this setup mainly for high bite wet tracks or does it work for more dry/dusty conditions too?
-What handling advantages does this setup offer over the standard weighted setup?
#6743
Thanks for the setup. Got a couple of questions though:
-Are you guys adding any weight to the cars with this setup, other than to balance out the chassis left/right?
-Is this setup mainly for high bite wet tracks or does it work for more dry/dusty conditions too?
-What handling advantages does this setup offer over the standard weighted setup?
-Are you guys adding any weight to the cars with this setup, other than to balance out the chassis left/right?
-Is this setup mainly for high bite wet tracks or does it work for more dry/dusty conditions too?
-What handling advantages does this setup offer over the standard weighted setup?
I've been running this set up on 2 tracks. One damp high bite clay, the other is fairly slick. The set up was good on both tracks.
The lighter car is much more nimble and seems easier to carry corner speed.
Sometimes...
#6745
I'll try to post pic's this weekend.
#6748
depends on how much grip you need in the rear of the truck... I'm usually trying to get rid of the rear grip, in which case the 4th hole on the truck would make this worse.