Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree5Likes

SC10 4x4 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2012 | 01:50 PM
  #16861  
JEFFs SC10's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,044
From: Orlandooooo, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by heavyjeffd
It's not that we're trying to make the truck jump like a 1/8 buggy, at least I'm not.

However I do competitively race against SCTE's and need to do everything I can to be competitive against them on 1/8th sized tracks.
Run a sc8e
JEFFs SC10 is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 01:50 PM
  #16862  
CristianTabush's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,165
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by murky123
when you stop trying to make this truck jump like a 1/8 buggy or other SC truck developed on a 1/8 buggy platform you will see that there are no issues regarding jumping.

it is more then logic that a losi scte will jump better on larger jumps and 1/8 tracks.
ok, so a losi wil jump better, the AE will turn better

an 1/10 SC truck based on a 1/8 platform has whole other handling then a 1/10 SC truck based on a 1/10 platform
As Jeff stated, it's not about making the truck jump like an 8th scale, it's about making it jump better, period. When some trucks can clear a larger jump easier than others, it is an issue. Specially if you are loosing seconds on a particular part of a 30+ second lap.
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 01:52 PM
  #16863  
slashracer111's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 491
From: Cullman, AL
Default

Seems like air control is a widely spread issue...

My truck has been great jumping wise. I usually don't have much trouble, except for the table top, then double at the outdoor track. I can land the table top fine, but as soon as you hit the double, all control is lost. I think the angle is abit too steep, causing the truck to bottom out.

My truck lands the little stuff better than my e-buggy.
slashracer111 is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 01:53 PM
  #16864  
Evil Genius jr.'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,758
From: Northern, VA
Default

Looking at the numbers the LOSI and Durango have almost even F/R weight distribution. I wonder if that has anything to do with it.
Evil Genius jr. is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 01:58 PM
  #16865  
Farmer_John's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 656
Default

Originally Posted by CristianTabush
As Jeff stated, it's not about making the truck jump like an 8th scale, it's about making it jump better, period. When some trucks can clear a larger jump easier than others, it is an issue. Specially if you are loosing seconds on a particular part of a 30+ second lap.
Now that's where thought process comes in to play.

scenario: long straight with a triple that feeds quickly into a 160* turn. Executed correctly, you GAIN time on those flying the triple only to have to burn off their momentum for the turn by doubling then having the drive into the corner. This truck is a great turner and can consistantly turn under any other SC truck. Why try to play into another brands perceived advantage?

You can't accelerate in the air.
Farmer_John is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 02:16 PM
  #16866  
CristianTabush's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,165
From: Houston
Default

The advantage here was that when doubling, you would approach the jump slowly, so that it was not overshot. The ones that cleared the quad accelerated much more, and if actually executed correctly, would jump low and fast, at a much faster rate than the trucks that were leaving the ground twice.

Jumping the quad was a decided advantage, there was absolutely no possible way to gain ground on a truck that was executing the quad correctly by doing a double double. No matter how you want to spin it and how much you want to claim that the truck has more steering, if you can clear a bigger jump you went 2 seconds faster per lap. That was fact on this particular layout. This was the spot I made 99% of my passing. It was easy to do it and not a single truck or buggy being driven by anyone this weekend went faster by doubling.

While you can't accelerate in the air, you can accelerate more on the ground and carry more speed through the air by clearing a large jump than by doing a double double at a slower rate of speed.

Our scenario was nearly identical to what you described as well. 150+ foot straight into a 180 deg berm to a quad. Execute the quad and run around a 32.9 to 34.0 lap time. Do a double double 34.9 to 36.0 lap.

And BTW, my SCTE also had more corner speed than my AE, since it generated more traction.
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 02:36 PM
  #16867  
symmetricon's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,882
From: houston
Default

Originally Posted by CristianTabush
The advantage here was that when doubling, you would approach the jump slowly, so that it was not overshot. The ones that cleared the quad accelerated much more, and if actually executed correctly, would jump low and fast, at a much faster rate than the trucks that were leaving the ground twice.

Jumping the quad was a decided advantage, there was absolutely no possible way to gain ground on a truck that was executing the quad correctly by doing a double double. No matter how you want to spin it and how much you want to claim that the truck has more steering, if you can clear a bigger jump you went 2 seconds faster per lap. That was fact on this particular layout. This was the spot I made 99% of my passing. It was easy to do it and not a single truck or buggy being driven by anyone this weekend went faster by doubling.

While you can't accelerate in the air, you can accelerate more on the ground and carry more speed through the air by clearing a large jump than by doing a double double at a slower rate of speed.

Our scenario was nearly identical to what you described as well. 150+ foot straight into a 180 deg berm to a quad. Execute the quad and run around a 32.9 to 34.0 lap time. Do a double double 34.9 to 36.0 lap.

And BTW, my SCTE also had more corner speed than my AE, since it generated more traction.
This is exactly correct. Usually I am 2-3 second slower than tq (my fastest lap vs tq's fastes lap), but with this layout, I was 3-5 sec slower than tq's fastest lap. My fastest lap in qualifying was 36sec-ish while tq was 32sec-ish. The day before the race, while practicing, I was able to get into the 35sec range by quading instead of double doubling it, but I was too inconsistent to do it in a race.

next time at the track I'm gonna figure out how to run my suspension to clear the quad and triple, or break something while trying
symmetricon is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 03:33 PM
  #16868  
MantisWorx's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,955
Default

Originally Posted by CristianTabush
The advantage here was that when doubling, you would approach the jump slowly, so that it was not overshot. The ones that cleared the quad accelerated much more, and if actually executed correctly, would jump low and fast, at a much faster rate than the trucks that were leaving the ground twice.

Jumping the quad was a decided advantage, there was absolutely no possible way to gain ground on a truck that was executing the quad correctly by doing a double double. No matter how you want to spin it and how much you want to claim that the truck has more steering, if you can clear a bigger jump you went 2 seconds faster per lap. That was fact on this particular layout. This was the spot I made 99% of my passing. It was easy to do it and not a single truck or buggy being driven by anyone this weekend went faster by doubling.

While you can't accelerate in the air, you can accelerate more on the ground and carry more speed through the air by clearing a large jump than by doing a double double at a slower rate of speed.

Our scenario was nearly identical to what you described as well. 150+ foot straight into a 180 deg berm to a quad. Execute the quad and run around a 32.9 to 34.0 lap time. Do a double double 34.9 to 36.0 lap.

And BTW, my SCTE also had more corner speed than my AE, since it generated more traction.
I have to agree, it seems that the difference in opinion stems from the fact that some are not as competitive or dont have a fast group of drivers at their local track. Ask anyone in houston that runs SC, we have a very fast group of guys. Your not going to be able to catch up to a truck that just jumped over you in the next turn, you just got dropped back 2 seconds! Around here it takes at least five solid laps to make up a 2 second gap and thats assuming you make zero mistakes and the guy in front does!
MantisWorx is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 03:35 PM
  #16869  
Farmer_John's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 656
Default

Originally Posted by symmetricon
This is exactly correct. Usually I am 2-3 second slower than tq (my fastest lap vs tq's fastes lap), but with this layout, I was 3-5 sec slower than tq's fastest lap. My fastest lap in qualifying was 36sec-ish while tq was 32sec-ish. The day before the race, while practicing, I was able to get into the 35sec range by quading instead of double doubling it, but I was too inconsistent to do it in a race.

next time at the track I'm gonna figure out how to run my suspension to clear the quad and triple, or break something while trying
Now given that I also was off TQ by 3-4 seconds, I made the best of it. BUT, the most consistent times all day were turned by those that kept the car on the most consistent (if not conservative) line and that was to double/single that line.

I also can't say that tuning for one section of track is going to give you the most successful outcome. you may clear that quad section great, but lose it everywhere else on the track. I've seen one Austin based buggy driver do this time after time to no avail. It's almost as bad as his throttle tuning habits...I used to pit the guy just to experience the meltdown!

But really, setup for the whole track. It's all compromise. Just try to do it in your favor.
Farmer_John is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 03:40 PM
  #16870  
Mizchief's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,069
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Not the one that is wrong ...


The guy goes & says, I know it won't work so I won't even try, even though what I'm doing now is'nt working so that's why I won't even try the good set-up & no thanks for the help cus I know it won't help ...
When are we going to learn to quit feeding this troll? He only seems to come out of the woodwork when someone is having a bad day just to kick a man when hes down.

If he really thinks one setup works for all tracks, especially a track with an extreme layout, then he is obviously mentally challenged and trying to argue with someone like that is like trying to argue with a 3 year old. You just nod and smile and say "sure honey they are really called pig newtons not fig newtons" and go about your day.
Mizchief is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 03:54 PM
  #16871  
lip
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 306
Default

Anyone who has driven an SCTE can attest to it jumping easier...don't get me wrong, I think the SC104x4 is more nimble and quicker around the track but like the others are saying, screwing up the jumps or being overly conservative leads to losses in time...
lip is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 04:24 PM
  #16872  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

[QUOTE=Mizchief;10287670

If he really thinks one setup works for all tracks, especially a track with an extreme layout,[/QUOTE]



A good factory set-up can't be any slower than a home brewed set-up that isn't working at all .....


Most use a very similar set-ups on their B4.1 across the country. They copy the factory guys set-up pronto , proof a good set-up works in most conditions & various tracks ..
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 05:17 PM
  #16873  
JEFFs SC10's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,044
From: Orlandooooo, Fl
Default

The same setup at west coast wont be the same as running at orange county, north cal, mikes hobby shop, bashers in palm.beach or the short course nationals in connecticut.

If that was the.case why do.the pros change their setups for.different.tracks and conditions?

Cmon man.
JEFFs SC10 is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 06:02 PM
  #16874  
hELllNino's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 264
From: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Default

Originally Posted by JEFFs SC10
The same setup at west coast wont be the same as running at orange county, north cal, mikes hobby shop, bashers in palm.beach or the short course nationals in connecticut.

If that was the.case why do.the pros change their setups for.different.tracks and conditions?

Cmon man.
the only thing that works at bashers is not throwing your radio across the room in frustration. thats where i run, and that "modification" is the only reason i have ever finished well there

and it is pronounced....c'monnnnn maaaaaaan

Last edited by hELllNino; 02-06-2012 at 06:13 PM.
hELllNino is offline  
Old 02-06-2012 | 06:03 PM
  #16875  
King DORK's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,032
From: Wherever my alien friends take me.
Default

Wow, I have an SC10 4x4 on order and I'm glad I have a decent enough knowledge on what adjustments do what and will be happy to get my truck on the track and work the bugs out. If I was in need of useful information it would be hard to find any here. I've read back many pages here and aside from an occasionally useful "pearl of wisdom" this is basically just a juvenile di** measuring contest. I feel sorry for those trying to use this forum as a tool to gain knowledge. So, have at it gentlemen, and don't let that ruler smack y'all on the tip!
King DORK is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.