RC10B4.1 FT/WC

Old 10-12-2011 | 09:28 PM
  #6526  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Originally Posted by RickSlick
So, is everyone all giddy over the new 8mm+ chassis?
O yeah ......
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 10-12-2011 | 11:39 PM
  #6527  
rcguy76559's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 668
From: Jarrell tx
Default

T4 for sale
http://www.rctech.net/forum/r-c-item...paint-new.html
rcguy76559 is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 02:36 AM
  #6528  
Lonestar's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,271
From: Switzerland
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt.America
2.5 to 5
Originally Posted by pimpedaccord
It's not really a linear correlation, but roughly about 5wt difference between pistons.
okeedokee. thanks peeps.

Paul
Lonestar is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 05:48 AM
  #6529  
Dane's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,829
From: Texas Baby
Default

Originally Posted by RickSlick
So, is everyone all giddy over the new 8mm+ chassis?
For the number of times this car has won the Worlds with the 0mm configuration, I'm not in a rush.

More importantly, it is interesting to see how AE is handling development. Rather than coming out with a new car, they release updates. They did the same recently with the 12R5.1. Instead of releasing a "Lipo" car, they released an upgrade set. Hmmm AE, what are you cooking up?
Dane is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 07:22 AM
  #6530  
SoccerSting's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 256
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by Dane
For the number of times this car has won the Worlds with the 0mm configuration, I'm not in a rush.

More importantly, it is interesting to see how AE is handling development. Rather than coming out with a new car, they release updates. They did the same recently with the 12R5.1. Instead of releasing a "Lipo" car, they released an upgrade set. Hmmm AE, what are you cooking up?
I was thinking the same thing. I thought with the release of the the 22 and the DEX210, they would come out with a B5. Since they are just releasing these parts, maybe there won't be a B5 for a while. Too bad.
SoccerSting is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 07:26 AM
  #6531  
Matt Trimmings's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (171)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,313
From: Tucson AZ
Default

Originally Posted by SoccerSting
I was thinking the same thing. I thought with the release of the the 22 and the DEX210, they would come out with a B5. Since they are just releasing these parts, maybe there won't be a B5 for a while. Too bad.
They are releasing these parts because they know they can sell the heck out of them.
Matt Trimmings is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 07:38 AM
  #6532  
Oso Negro's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 138
From: OC - CA
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Trimmings
They are releasing these parts because they know they can sell the heck out of them.
+1

I wouldn't assume anything based on the release of these updates.

AE knows everyone wants this stuff, so why not make some money?

These parts may have little to nothing to do with the development cycle of the next AE 2wd buggy. I wouldn't assume that they'll even call it a B5 when it does eventually come out. It sounds a lot like the Kyosho RB5 to me, after all.
Oso Negro is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 08:03 AM
  #6533  
bds81175's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,745
From: Litchfield, Minnesota
Default

Incremental improvements work for me. As long as we can continue to stay ahead of the Jones' (TLR, Kyosho, and Durango).
bds81175 is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 10:25 AM
  #6534  
bilster44's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 667
From: Sactown, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by RickSlick
So, is everyone all giddy over the new 8mm+ chassis?
Not at all, why should we be? I have all that garb already.
bilster44 is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 10:36 AM
  #6535  
racer1812's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,739
From: RIP 'Chopper', 4/18/13 miss you bud:(
Default

Originally Posted by Oso Negro
+1

I wouldn't assume anything based on the release of these updates.

AE knows everyone wants this stuff, so why not make some money?

These parts may have little to nothing to do with the development cycle of the next AE 2wd buggy. I wouldn't assume that they'll even call it a B5 when it does eventually come out. It sounds a lot like the Kyosho RB5 to me, after all.
racer1812 is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 10:45 AM
  #6536  
Timmahhh's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 888
From: Hoffman Estates, IL
Default

I need to try the +8 before deciding. The 22, though much more stable, seems to have less weight transfer to get traction out of the corners, or to shift weight forward to dive in. My local tracks are mostly well groomed and have a lot of tight 180s so the weight transfer seems to help get around the track better. Mental physics says a shorter car will do this better, but the difference in the 22 may be something else, such as the low cg with the big aluminum plate so low in the car.

Definitely interested to check it out though.
Timmahhh is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 11:35 AM
  #6537  
Cpt.America's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11,085
From: Washington State
Default

Originally Posted by Timmahhh
I need to try the +8 before deciding. The 22, though much more stable, seems to have less weight transfer to get traction out of the corners, or to shift weight forward to dive in. My local tracks are mostly well groomed and have a lot of tight 180s so the weight transfer seems to help get around the track better. Mental physics says a shorter car will do this better, but the difference in the 22 may be something else, such as the low cg with the big aluminum plate so low in the car.

Definitely interested to check it out though.
It's because the 22 is too long, and most people over-damp them. There are plenty of easy ways to get the 22 to turn great... box stock setup isn't one of them. But now matter how you trim it, it will never be as aggressive or agile as the B4.
Cpt.America is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 11:41 AM
  #6538  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Rc10

B2

B3

B4


RC10B5 ? Any other name would not make sense....
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 11:47 AM
  #6539  
Suspended
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Default b4.1 buggy

I have a b4.1 with ko propo bmc vfs-1 v1.5 esc and a thunder power 8.5 motor what would be a good pinion and spur set up for this buggy to have good bottom and top end? it doesnt seam fast enough right now!
belliso is offline  
Old 10-13-2011 | 12:10 PM
  #6540  
Ruffy's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Default

After making my +8mm, not excited about it anymore. Car didn't handle any better to me, to be honest. For me, the standard short chassis felt better.
Ruffy is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.