Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread >

Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1089Likes

Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 03-24-2020, 06:21 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: Kraig
Welcome to the B6.1 and B6.1D Wiki page.





Features:

Easy-access gear differential
Differential height adjustment with 0, 1, 2, and 3mm inserts included
New slipper assembly for better weight balance and shock clearance
3-gear Laydown Stealth(r) transmission for lower and forward CG
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite front shock tower with tower guard
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite rear tower, standard height
Heavy-duty V2 rear axle with 67mm bones
V2 springs for a more reactive and nimble feel
Innovative rear arm with molded inserts for ultra-fine lower shock mount adjustment
Molded spur gear guard to help protect body from damage
Front and rear anti-roll bars limit chassis roll for increased corner speed
Battery strap allows the use of optional turnbuckle-based braces
Machined pistons included for better fit and smoother operation
Aluminum rear clamping hex and front axle with laser etching
Rear hubs feature large bearings and the easy-insert system to adjust camber link position and rear axle height
One-piece shock bushing to make assembly easier
Aluminum C and D arm mounts included for large range of anti-squat and toe adjustment
Lightweight aluminum top shaft
Factory Team upgraded ball bearing kit included (now oiled instead of greased for less drag)
JConcepts(r) B6 clear body and wing included
Steel chassis weight
Shortened, 7075 aluminum chassis






Features:

Easy-access ball differential
Differential height adjustment with 0, 1, 2, and 3mm inserts included
New slipper assembly for better weight balance and shock clearance
3-gear Lay Back Stealth(r) transmission for lower and rearward CG
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite front shock tower with tower guard
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite rear tower, long
Heavy-duty V2 rear axle with 67mm bones
V2 springs for a more reactive and nimble feel
Innovative rear arm with molded inserts for ultra-fine lower shock mount adjustment
Molded spur gear guard to help protect body from damage
+1 steering block arms optimize feel on dirt tracks
Battery strap allows the use of optional turnbuckle-based braces
Machined pistons included for better fit and smoother operation
Aluminum rear clamping hex and front axle with laser etching
Rear hubs feature large bearings and the easy-insert system to adjust camber link position and rear axle height
One-piece shock bushing to make assembly easier
Aluminum C and D arm mounts included for large range of anti-squat and toe adjustment
Lightweight aluminum top shaft
Factory Team upgraded ball bearing kit included (now oiled instead of greased for less drag)
JConcepts(r) B6 clear body and wing included
Shortened, 7075 aluminum chassis


Setup Sheets and other documentation
Setup sheets for both cars:
Piston Drills:
Aftermarket Upgrades:

Parts List:

Reference Guides (courtesy of Ray Munday and Roger M.):

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2019, 06:21 PM
  #2821  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 2,907
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BugleBoy10
Anybody racing with RPM arms? I was about to get a set of flat fronts for dirt, and noticed RPM offers some.
unless you are just bashing RPM is good.... if you are racing ... stick to the AE ones
Chris Reilly likes this.
Phillip F is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 12:09 AM
  #2822  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (26)
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 399
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by trf211
Richard adding a little more shock stroke will help. To me the only things that stick out on the setup sheet that will weaken the landing ability is the 27mm shock stroke, 28.5mm is a good starting point. The further you move the axles up the more it hampers the landing ability, so the shorter shock stroke and raised rear axle combined together will contribute to the bottom out issue. I'd start with just the shock package though as that is most important for jump handling.

Was this setup sheet made for your layout?
Thanks for the in depth answer. The setup wasn’t made for my exact track but it’s the closest i could find to the parameters of my local track. I’ll try lengthening the shock stroke. Front and rear you think?
richard0714 is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 05:37 AM
  #2823  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (159)
 
Krio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: At dirt tracks in Michigan!
Posts: 5,718
Trader Rating: 159 (99%+)
Default

What were the air temps like at your track? Every 10 degrees or so, you should be going up or down 2.5wt on the oil to keep damping the same. There's a chart somewhere that shows viscosity vs temp that will help you nail oil changes when the weather fluctuates. Just a thought on why you are experiencing bouncy landings. Maybe your local temps are different enough to warrant an oil change.
richard0714 likes this.
Krio is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 11:03 AM
  #2824  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (11)
 
BugleBoy10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 217
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Now that I've studied more setup sheets, it seems like most people are favoring the gull arms anyway. Out of 15 medium traction dirt setups, only 4 use flat arms and they are all with standup transmissions. Everybody else is on gull arms with standup or layback. I guess the best thing for me to do is just try them both and see for myself, but I'm curious. Anybody run flat arms with a layback?
BugleBoy10 is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 11:57 AM
  #2825  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 680
Default

Originally Posted by richard0714
Thanks for the in depth answer. The setup wasn’t made for my exact track but it’s the closest i could find to the parameters of my local track. I’ll try lengthening the shock stroke. Front and rear you think?
21mm front, 28.5mm rear is the base setup and a pretty balanced starting point.
richard0714 likes this.
trf211 is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 12:43 PM
  #2826  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BugleBoy10
Now that I've studied more setup sheets, it seems like most people are favoring the gull arms anyway. Out of 15 medium traction dirt setups, only 4 use flat arms and they are all with standup transmissions. Everybody else is on gull arms with standup or layback. I guess the best thing for me to do is just try them both and see for myself, but I'm curious. Anybody run flat arms with a layback?
I do, because I converted a B6D to 6.1D so I already had the flat arms. As near as I can tell, there isn't actually a difference in geometry between the two (tower positions cancel out arm location), so I don't consider the difference to be something to change for.

I think the setups you read may have as much to do with what the various kit configurations include as they do with set up choices.
Davidka is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 12:56 PM
  #2827  
Tech Champion
 
Mason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 5,500
Default

Richard, one other thing to clarify is your shock rebound. Pop the spring off and put the spring cup back on the shaft. compress it and if it rebounds this could be causing inconsistencies. Try the stroke changes as mention previously but definitely check the rebound each race day as it will change because... physics.
richard0714 likes this.
Mason is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 02:39 PM
  #2828  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Di_spencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: California
Posts: 648
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Davidka
I do, because I converted a B6D to 6.1D so I already had the flat arms. As near as I can tell, there isn't actually a difference in geometry between the two (tower positions cancel out arm location), so I don't consider the difference to be something to change for.

I think the setups you read may have as much to do with what the various kit configurations include as they do with set up choices.
From what I've heard the flat arms make the steering give a different feel that helps compensate for less weight in the front with a standup.
Di_spencer is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 09:06 PM
  #2829  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 48
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Question for you guys I have a factory lite i just got I want to run it on Astro turf track and carpet track. Someone told me the pucks and and ball diff are not good and I will tear them up. Is this right ? I got the gear diff and reg axles for it just in case . I also have a B6.1 D that I already setup for carpet from a buyer on the forum . I was gonna leave the factory lite setup for clay but I am pretty much gonna run at the track near me which is turf . Wanted to have a back up Buggy that’s why I got the 6.1D . Any help would be greatly appreciated.
RClos17 is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 11:47 PM
  #2830  
mes
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,048
Default

Originally Posted by RClos17
Question for you guys I have a factory lite i just got I want to run it on Astro turf track and carpet track. Someone told me the pucks and and ball diff are not good and I will tear them up. Is this right ? I got the gear diff and reg axles for it just in case . I also have a B6.1 D that I already setup for carpet from a buyer on the forum . I was gonna leave the factory lite setup for clay but I am pretty much gonna run at the track near me which is turf . Wanted to have a back up Buggy that’s why I got the 6.1D . Any help would be greatly appreciated.
With a direct drive system, your ball diff will suffer for sure. If you are running 17.5 only and switch to a slipper, you may be able to get some decent runtime out of your ball diff and pucks, but a standard drive train is better suited to such (very) high-grip surfaces. Adding the Schelle Nova would be a good compromise , it is lighter than the AE slipper.
mes is offline  
Old 05-25-2019, 12:03 AM
  #2831  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 2,907
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by RClos17
Question for you guys I have a factory lite i just got I want to run it on Astro turf track and carpet track. Someone told me the pucks and and ball diff are not good and I will tear them up. Is this right ? I got the gear diff and reg axles for it just in case . I also have a B6.1 D that I already setup for carpet from a buyer on the forum . I was gonna leave the factory lite setup for clay but I am pretty much gonna run at the track near me which is turf . Wanted to have a back up Buggy that’s why I got the 6.1D . Any help would be greatly appreciated.
carpet / uber high bite surface = schelle direct drive / or stock slipper , stock driveshafts, gear diff
clay / dirt = stock slipper / schelle nova slipper, any direct drive , aluminum pucks, stock driveshafts. ball diff

for me ... don't really care about pucks. I run stock driveshafts in all surfaces.
Phillip F is offline  
Old 05-25-2019, 02:33 AM
  #2832  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (11)
 
BugleBoy10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 217
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Davidka
I do, because I converted a B6D to 6.1D so I already had the flat arms. As near as I can tell, there isn't actually a difference in geometry between the two (tower positions cancel out arm location), so I don't consider the difference to be something to change for.

I think the setups you read may have as much to do with what the various kit configurations include as they do with set up choices.
I definitely agree that the geometry doesn’t change between the two positions no matter what the shape of the arm, but the way the shock behaves changes because it attaches at a different point along the arc it travels along. How that affect handling is beyond my grade school level education in physics.
Pistol123 likes this.
BugleBoy10 is offline  
Old 05-25-2019, 09:45 AM
  #2833  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 93
Default Beveled shock pistons?

Hey all, just joined and I’m getting back into racing after being gone for several long years. When would you use beveled shock pistons, and what advantage to they give you? Thanks I’m advance!
Medic29358 is offline  
Old 05-25-2019, 11:34 AM
  #2834  
mes
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,048
Default

Originally Posted by Medic29358
Hey all, just joined and I’m getting back into racing after being gone for several long years. When would you use beveled shock pistons, and what advantage to they give you? Thanks I’m advance!
Depending on the direction of the bevel, shock decompression or compression is faster. The can be good on very smooth tracks, but I found set-up work much easier with normal flat pistons.
mes is offline  
Old 05-25-2019, 05:35 PM
  #2835  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 48
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mes
With a direct drive system, your ball diff will suffer for sure. If you are running 17.5 only and switch to a slipper, you may be able to get some decent runtime out of your ball diff and pucks, but a standard drive train is better suited to such (very) high-grip surfaces. Adding the Schelle Nova would be a good compromise , it is lighter than the AE slipper.
Ok thanks guys I have the nova lockout and I got pucks but I am gonna put the stock axles back in and the gear diff. Now another question I have a Tekin Spec 3 17.5 or run a Team Scream 17.5 I had the guy at the local shop tell me the team screm motor will crap on the Tekin SPec 3 ? also anythiung else thats a must ? I have titanium everything pretty much what about tires what are the best?for turf
RClos17 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.