Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread >

Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1089Likes

Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 03-24-2020, 06:21 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: Kraig
Welcome to the B6.1 and B6.1D Wiki page.





Features:

Easy-access gear differential
Differential height adjustment with 0, 1, 2, and 3mm inserts included
New slipper assembly for better weight balance and shock clearance
3-gear Laydown Stealth(r) transmission for lower and forward CG
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite front shock tower with tower guard
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite rear tower, standard height
Heavy-duty V2 rear axle with 67mm bones
V2 springs for a more reactive and nimble feel
Innovative rear arm with molded inserts for ultra-fine lower shock mount adjustment
Molded spur gear guard to help protect body from damage
Front and rear anti-roll bars limit chassis roll for increased corner speed
Battery strap allows the use of optional turnbuckle-based braces
Machined pistons included for better fit and smoother operation
Aluminum rear clamping hex and front axle with laser etching
Rear hubs feature large bearings and the easy-insert system to adjust camber link position and rear axle height
One-piece shock bushing to make assembly easier
Aluminum C and D arm mounts included for large range of anti-squat and toe adjustment
Lightweight aluminum top shaft
Factory Team upgraded ball bearing kit included (now oiled instead of greased for less drag)
JConcepts(r) B6 clear body and wing included
Steel chassis weight
Shortened, 7075 aluminum chassis






Features:

Easy-access ball differential
Differential height adjustment with 0, 1, 2, and 3mm inserts included
New slipper assembly for better weight balance and shock clearance
3-gear Lay Back Stealth(r) transmission for lower and rearward CG
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite front shock tower with tower guard
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite rear tower, long
Heavy-duty V2 rear axle with 67mm bones
V2 springs for a more reactive and nimble feel
Innovative rear arm with molded inserts for ultra-fine lower shock mount adjustment
Molded spur gear guard to help protect body from damage
+1 steering block arms optimize feel on dirt tracks
Battery strap allows the use of optional turnbuckle-based braces
Machined pistons included for better fit and smoother operation
Aluminum rear clamping hex and front axle with laser etching
Rear hubs feature large bearings and the easy-insert system to adjust camber link position and rear axle height
One-piece shock bushing to make assembly easier
Aluminum C and D arm mounts included for large range of anti-squat and toe adjustment
Lightweight aluminum top shaft
Factory Team upgraded ball bearing kit included (now oiled instead of greased for less drag)
JConcepts(r) B6 clear body and wing included
Shortened, 7075 aluminum chassis


Setup Sheets and other documentation
Setup sheets for both cars:
Piston Drills:
Aftermarket Upgrades:

Parts List:

Reference Guides (courtesy of Ray Munday and Roger M.):

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2018, 06:18 AM
  #2146  
Tech Apprentice
 
smkd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 85
Default

In a general opinion, Is the MIP puck kit worth the upgrade? I have been toying with picking it it up. Just wondering what everyone’s consensus is on it
smkd13 is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 07:00 AM
  #2147  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by smkd13
In a general opinion, Is the MIP puck kit worth the upgrade? I have been toying with picking it it up. Just wondering what everyone’s consensus is on it
With the Associated version of the MIP puck system (the Associated/MIP and MIP products are different), I have really experienced the pick up in acceleration of the lightened drivetrain on our indoor clay track in Reno, NV.

But, don't try to use it on high traction carpet/turf or above a 17.5 stock blinky motor. Neither version of the puck system can withstand that level of grip or power.
Still Bill is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 07:01 AM
  #2148  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (166)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 4,596
Trader Rating: 166 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by thirtydaZe


oh really, i read a review at Amain that siad it didnt fit the layback.
Thanks, can you post the working part number of the diff for verification?

can anyone else help verify, or point me in the right direction, really just looking to plug ia gear diff into into my 6.1d to run carpet once a week, for about 8 races, otherwise we race dirt year round, will still be running dirt weekly as well so im hoping to just make a quick swap a couple times a week.
It fits. Don't trust amain hobbies reviews. I run it on astro when I need more rear grip as opposed to carpet.
thirtydaZe likes this.
jpcopeland1 is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 07:50 AM
  #2149  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jpcopeland1
It fits. Don't trust amain hobbies reviews. I run it on astro when I need more rear grip as opposed to carpet.
And I can confirm that both the B6 Gear Differential Kit #91703 and B6.1 Gear Differential Kit #91786 fit into the layback and laydown cases for the B6.1.

Differences between these two diffs are that the B6 version has a aluminum cover and metal pins for the planetary gears while the B6.1 version has plastic cover and plastic pins. This makes the B6.1 version about 2 grams lighter than the B6 unit.

Wonder if that one reviewer on AMain didn't know that there are two possible idler gears applicable to switching between the layback vs. laydown tranny cases. Or, maybe didn't know that the B6 gear diff assembly uses spacers on the output shafts; whereas, the B6.1 assembly doesn't need them.

Otherwise, I do trust MOST of the user reviews on AMain Hobbies...LOL
thirtydaZe likes this.

Last edited by Still Bill; 12-12-2018 at 08:02 AM.
Still Bill is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 09:38 AM
  #2150  
Tech Regular
 
MikeO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SoOrg
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by Still Bill
But, don't try to use it on high traction carpet/turf or above a 17.5 stock blinky motor. Neither version of the puck system can withstand that level of grip or power.
For 17.5 on astro I run the Exotek adaptor pins in 67mm Mip puck shafts with a gear diff. I haven't had any issue since February and its been wonderful. Ive been running Xray plastic XB2 internal diff gears inside my 6.1 diff since then as well. The only issue I've had with the 6.1 transmission is the idler gear with the Associated slipper eliminator but I've since switched back to an Exotek eliminator and had no issues since.

I need to measure the difference between 6.0 to 6.1 gear diff outdrives, I just found out GFRP makes aluminum outdrives for there oval cars for the 6.0/sc10 diff. I love running super lite drivetrains.
MikeO is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 12:21 PM
  #2151  
Tech Addict
 
sea1swk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Tacoma Area
Posts: 502
Default

Maybe hidden somewhere here, couple questions on b6.1d, 17.5, clay.

I've been running the Reedy / Maclan HV 3600, slim batteries. They weigh about 150g. I enjoy the lower center, and lighter weight. Allows weight to be put in other places.
But some of the racers tell me that the Low Profile batteries are not as fast? They loose power before the end of the race? They say I am better off with a full size HV 4800 battery at 200g?

Fans..... It is rather cold around here, this time of year. No fan, still running under 140 degree on the Motor. But I ready where in Stock racing, you really want to run a fan? Any good rule on when to Fan, or not to Fan?
sea1swk is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 12:55 PM
  #2152  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by sea1swk
Maybe hidden somewhere here, couple questions on b6.1d, 17.5, clay.

I've been running the Reedy / Maclan HV 3600, slim batteries. They weigh about 150g. I enjoy the lower center, and lighter weight. Allows weight to be put in other places.
But some of the racers tell me that the Low Profile batteries are not as fast? They loose power before the end of the race? They say I am better off with a full size HV 4800 battery at 200g?

Fans..... It is rather cold around here, this time of year. No fan, still running under 140 degree on the Motor. But I ready where in Stock racing, you really want to run a fan? Any good rule on when to Fan, or not to Fan?
I believe what they're referring to with the battery suggestion is that a lower mah battery will discharge lower into it's voltage curve than a higher mah battery over a given amount of time/load. I rarely pull more than 1,000mah from a pack in a 17.5/5 minute run. Even with the low-profile pack, that's less than 30% of the available capacity. I would think the difference would be very small between the two, unless you're running super high grip or longer runs, and pulling many more amps. There are plenty of top level modified guys running low-profile packs in modified, and they're pulling at least twice as many amps in a run as we do with stock motors.

Usually when a stock buggy slows noticeably in a run it is because of motor heat weakening the rotor's magnetic strength. If you are not noticing this fade, you don't need a fan.
Davidka is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 01:58 PM
  #2153  
Tech Fanatic
 
lexusbest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vizcaya, Spain
Posts: 751
Default

Originally Posted by Davidka
I believe what they're referring to with the battery suggestion is that a lower mah battery will discharge lower into it's voltage curve than a higher mah battery over a given amount of time/load. I rarely pull more than 1,000mah from a pack in a 17.5/5 minute run. Even with the low-profile pack, that's less than 30% of the available capacity. I would think the difference would be very small between the two, unless you're running super high grip or longer runs, and pulling many more amps. There are plenty of top level modified guys running low-profile packs in modified, and they're pulling at least twice as many amps in a run as we do with stock motors.

Usually when a stock buggy slows noticeably in a run it is because of motor heat weakening the rotor's magnetic strength. If you are not noticing this fade, you don't need a fan.
a friend of mine is running an 8.5 turn with 3200mah gens ace low profile packs with no issues on 7 min runs
lexusbest is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 02:15 PM
  #2154  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Still Bill
With the Associated version of the MIP puck system (the Associated/MIP and MIP products are different), I have really experienced the pick up in acceleration of the lightened drivetrain on our indoor clay track in Reno, NV.

But, don't try to use it on high traction carpet/turf or above a 17.5 stock blinky motor. Neither version of the puck system can withstand that level of grip or power.
I run a b6.1 on carpet oval. Converted to EDM class. I run a gear diff and was going to try a new/old stock set of mip pucks for a gear diff that I found. Why don't the puck system hold up to carpet?
cbazq271 is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 02:35 PM
  #2155  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 93
Default Bulkhead

Do you need to use the metal plate in front of the bulkhead when running aluminium or brass versions?
2hundy is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 02:37 PM
  #2156  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by lexusbest
a friend of mine is running an 8.5 turn with 3200mah gens ace low profile packs with no issues on 7 min runs
With the abundance of power a modified motor provides I'm sure it's less of a problem (we used to run far less efficient brushed modifiers on 2000mah nicds), but you know how the stock guys are. Every gram.
Davidka is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 02:48 PM
  #2157  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (72)
 
YankeeFan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,188
Trader Rating: 72 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by sea1swk
Maybe hidden somewhere here, couple questions on b6.1d, 17.5, clay.

I've been running the Reedy / Maclan HV 3600, slim batteries. They weigh about 150g. I enjoy the lower center, and lighter weight. Allows weight to be put in other places.
But some of the racers tell me that the Low Profile batteries are not as fast? They loose power before the end of the race? They say I am better off with a full size HV 4800 battery at 200g?

Fans..... It is rather cold around here, this time of year. No fan, still running under 140 degree on the Motor. But I ready where in Stock racing, you really want to run a fan? Any good rule on when to Fan, or not to Fan?
Personally, I prefer the heavier packs so my car dies less by the end of the run, especially if a track has a triple that is barely makeable by stock then I want to hit that throughout the entire run. I also find myself wanting to add weight, even in stock so the heavier batteries account for that without having to add chassis weights.

I always run a fan in stock because the motor temps can get up there and you always want your motor running as cool as possible.

PS when you run a fan it pulls some of the juice from the battery so the larger pack/fan combo go hand in hand for me.
YankeeFan123 is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 06:34 PM
  #2158  
Tech Apprentice
 
smkd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Still Bill
With the Associated version of the MIP puck system (the Associated/MIP and MIP products are different), I have really experienced the pick up in acceleration of the lightened drivetrain on our indoor clay track in Reno, NV.

But, don't try to use it on high traction carpet/turf or above a 17.5 stock blinky motor. Neither version of the puck system can withstand that level of grip or power.
i am running a 17.5 no Blinky mode on indoor clay in SLC UT. Probably will be ok with it. I think I am gonna pull the trigger and get them
smkd13 is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 09:41 PM
  #2159  
Tech Adept
 
5tone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: france
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by 2hundy
Do you need to use the metal plate in front of the bulkhead when running aluminium or brass versions?
yes.
same dimensions as the plastic one.
5tone is offline  
Old 12-12-2018, 10:50 PM
  #2160  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 2,907
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by smkd13
In a general opinion, Is the MIP puck kit worth the upgrade? I have been toying with picking it it up. Just wondering what everyone’s consensus is on it
first of all if you run carpet ...forget about it...it will snap even with stock motors. I had it in my B6d racing on dirt. It does feel different but you have to get used to it ...pretty tricky when you race on a wet track... I wish I did not spend all that money for it. But on clay, it might be better..... considering your tire prep is on point.
Phillip F is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.