TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread!
|
|||
#2221
Tech Initiate
Does the kit come with servo spacers? I've got my kit on the way and also a Specktrm 6240 servo and need to know if I also need to order spacers for the servo. Thanks
#2223
Check this out guys
Last edited by Matt M.; 03-11-2017 at 03:28 AM.
#2224
Tech Rookie
#2225
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
Imo, dual rates work better, as you keep your entire trigger pull. EPA just limited the max top speed, but the last little bit of trigger pull will do nothing. D/R will also soften up the bottom end and make a hot motor easier to drive. That has been my experience with radio tuning.
#2226
Tech Adept
#2227
Isn't dual rate the same as EPA, but just applied equally to both directions... usually applied to steering?
I've never seen a "dead band" using EPA. In other words, if I use 80% EPA, that 80% of throw is still only reached at max trigger pull/ wheel turn, no? Or maybe I just never noticed...
I've never seen a "dead band" using EPA. In other words, if I use 80% EPA, that 80% of throw is still only reached at max trigger pull/ wheel turn, no? Or maybe I just never noticed...
#2228
Tech Elite
iTrader: (45)
Isn't dual rate the same as EPA, but just applied equally to both directions... usually applied to steering?
I've never seen a "dead band" using EPA. In other words, if I use 80% EPA, that 80% of throw is still only reached at max trigger pull/ wheel turn, no? Or maybe I just never noticed...
I've never seen a "dead band" using EPA. In other words, if I use 80% EPA, that 80% of throw is still only reached at max trigger pull/ wheel turn, no? Or maybe I just never noticed...
I usually use EPA and/or exponential to limit the amount of throttle and braking individually.
For steering I use EPA to limit overall steering throw (so that I'm not trying to move the steering beyond it's physical limits), but typically de-tune with exponential if needed. I think in this case Dual Rate and exponential could work well to tune steering because if you use Dual Rate in this application it would affect both left and right throws equally (to limit the maximum amount of steering available on both L/R turns) so that you set this at one place, versus having to reduce the throw individually for L/R via EPA.
#2229
Imo, dual rates work better, as you keep your entire trigger pull. EPA just limited the max top speed, but the last little bit of trigger pull will do nothing. D/R will also soften up the bottom end and make a hot motor easier to drive. That has been my experience with radio tuning.
#2230
Anyone know where there is cut gears in stock? Wanna set everything up at one time with the pucks and cut gears so i don't have to get back into it later.
#2231
Tech Adept
iTrader: (10)
To expand on why it's not correct for those that are still confused:
Turning the EPA down basically just changes at what percentage of full throttle gets delivered to the ESC at literal full throttle. If your EPA is set to 90% and you pull the trigger all the way the transmitter registers the full trigger pull but only delivers a signal to the ESC to pull 90%. That last 10% is not wasted, it is just "hidden" and the remaining 90% is rolled into the rest of the trigger pull. Dual rate will do the same function but will function in BOTH directions, meaning your brake pull will be affected the same way, hence the dual rate..
This is exactly what's done on nitro cars when adjusting throttle linkage. EPA often has to be turned down so as not to over-pull the carburetor. You still get all the throttle pull you need and the "extra" is not dead in the trigger.
Turning the EPA down basically just changes at what percentage of full throttle gets delivered to the ESC at literal full throttle. If your EPA is set to 90% and you pull the trigger all the way the transmitter registers the full trigger pull but only delivers a signal to the ESC to pull 90%. That last 10% is not wasted, it is just "hidden" and the remaining 90% is rolled into the rest of the trigger pull. Dual rate will do the same function but will function in BOTH directions, meaning your brake pull will be affected the same way, hence the dual rate..
This is exactly what's done on nitro cars when adjusting throttle linkage. EPA often has to be turned down so as not to over-pull the carburetor. You still get all the throttle pull you need and the "extra" is not dead in the trigger.
Last edited by 68pontiac; 03-01-2016 at 11:42 AM. Reason: added clarity
#2232
To expand on why it's not correct for those that are still confused:
Turning the EPA down basically just changes at what percentage of full throttle gets delivered to the ESC at literal full throttle. If your EPA is set to 90% and you pull the trigger all the way the transmitter registers the full trigger pull but only delivers a signal to the ESC to pull 90%. That last 10% is not wasted, it is just "hidden" and the remaining 90% is rolled into the rest of the trigger pull. Dual rate will do the same function but will function in BOTH directions, meaning your brake pull will be affected the same way, hence the dual rate..
This is exactly what's done on nitro cars when adjusting throttle linkage. EPA often has to be turned down so as not to over-pull the carburetor. You still get all the throttle pull you need and the "extra" is not dead in the trigger.
Turning the EPA down basically just changes at what percentage of full throttle gets delivered to the ESC at literal full throttle. If your EPA is set to 90% and you pull the trigger all the way the transmitter registers the full trigger pull but only delivers a signal to the ESC to pull 90%. That last 10% is not wasted, it is just "hidden" and the remaining 90% is rolled into the rest of the trigger pull. Dual rate will do the same function but will function in BOTH directions, meaning your brake pull will be affected the same way, hence the dual rate..
This is exactly what's done on nitro cars when adjusting throttle linkage. EPA often has to be turned down so as not to over-pull the carburetor. You still get all the throttle pull you need and the "extra" is not dead in the trigger.
#2233
Tech Addict
iTrader: (22)
Thanks man! I spent a ton of time building it to my perfection.
Exactly what I thought and my reasoning in getting a 7.5t. I also dial the expo settings so that I have a bit more throttle resolution, as to not gun it and zip into a bad situation, as I get used to a 7.5t motor in a buggy, this is something i learned when practicing with a buddies car.
Yeah, as I said I was mistaken. Appeciate the correction.
Eye candy: This is just my practice body, I will have a JC Finisher S2 painted by Jammin RC as he is local to me. Also still have to cut some wicker bill off.
Exactly what I thought and my reasoning in getting a 7.5t. I also dial the expo settings so that I have a bit more throttle resolution, as to not gun it and zip into a bad situation, as I get used to a 7.5t motor in a buggy, this is something i learned when practicing with a buddies car.
Yeah, as I said I was mistaken. Appeciate the correction.
Eye candy: This is just my practice body, I will have a JC Finisher S2 painted by Jammin RC as he is local to me. Also still have to cut some wicker bill off.
#2234
Yeah its a yz2 transmission. Some guy on the UK forum did this mod. Looks pretty good doesnt it? But thats it, he posted pictures with no other details
#2235