Capricorn LAB-C01
#1997
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
Yes please Daan, one that's compatible for spektrum 3100 receivers which are a little bigger than sanwa's and futaba I think.
Dimensions (WxLxH): .85x1.30x.48(in) 21.6x33.1x12.35(mm)
So, I would like to have the receiver in the horzontal position to allow the wiring inside the box to connect top down.
I need two please for a standard C02
Dimensions (WxLxH): .85x1.30x.48(in) 21.6x33.1x12.35(mm)
So, I would like to have the receiver in the horzontal position to allow the wiring inside the box to connect top down.
I need two please for a standard C02
#1998
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
Personally I prefer the wishbone type upper link.
If you want to post bigger pictures and post multiple in the same post pleas register at www.photobucket.com
Upload your images and then copy the [IMG]example code[/IMG]
in to your post.
any one tried the new chassis
http://www.capricornrc.com/capricorn...d_product=2031
some feedback please.
http://www.capricornrc.com/capricorn...d_product=2031
some feedback please.
However when it's time to replace a chassis I would replace it with the optional one.
#1999
Thanks for the input, i actually only did this because my car was missing the parts to complete the stock wishbone link, so i got creative and made a new one, will try it out, back to back n see if i to will prefer the wishbone link.......
#2000
Tech Adept
#2003
if this works, why not^^
#2004
Diff gears and diff pins??
Fellas quick question, Can u use the metal gears inside the Kevlar diffs (rear). Also if u can use the metal gears, can u use the lightweight pins that came with the Kevlar diffs in the WC kit??
#2005
X-RAY SERVO SAVER???
Fellas have any of you used or witnessed someone using a complete X-ray steering servo saver in a lab co2? I asked cause that part is cheaper n much easier to get than the cap part..........
Also on the ankerman positions, (10,11,12,13) can someone explain how Capricorn just change the distance of the holes, But X-ray pills seem to move the holes forward and back. Are they achieving the samething but in a different way??
Also on the ankerman positions, (10,11,12,13) can someone explain how Capricorn just change the distance of the holes, But X-ray pills seem to move the holes forward and back. Are they achieving the samething but in a different way??
#2006
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
Nope, had the idea when I bought a Tamiya M05 last year and saw the small shocks those use. Kind a sucks Xray beat me to it with the T4.
Since the idea of low towers and short shocks on a IC car is out in the open now (NT1'13) I figured I post the ones I made.
Yes, not a issue.
But the question is why would you want that?
I've seen some use the NT1 servosaver in the C01/C02 so it should fit without an issue.
Both methods have the same effect, personally I think moving the holes further or closer apart is the better method since it keeps the steering more linear throughout the different positions.
Since the idea of low towers and short shocks on a IC car is out in the open now (NT1'13) I figured I post the ones I made.
But the question is why would you want that?
Fellas have any of you used or witnessed someone using a complete X-ray steering servo saver in a lab co2? I asked cause that part is cheaper n much easier to get than the cap part..........
Also on the ankerman positions, (10,11,12,13) can someone explain how Capricorn just change the distance of the holes, But X-ray pills seem to move the holes forward and back. Are they achieving the samething but in a different way??
Also on the ankerman positions, (10,11,12,13) can someone explain how Capricorn just change the distance of the holes, But X-ray pills seem to move the holes forward and back. Are they achieving the samething but in a different way??
Both methods have the same effect, personally I think moving the holes further or closer apart is the better method since it keeps the steering more linear throughout the different positions.
#2007
I asked only cause I broke the plastic gears in the wc rear diff in only 2races! I thought maybe the oil was low, but after inspection I think i destroyed the gears from a hard impact to the side of the right rear tire so I'll sacrifice a little weight for a little strength
#2009
Nope, had the idea when I bought a Tamiya M05 last year and saw the small shocks those use. Kind a sucks Xray beat me to it with the T4.
Since the idea of low towers and short shocks on a IC car is out in the open now (NT1'13) I figured I post the ones I made.
Yes, not a issue.
But the question is why would you want that?
I've seen some use the NT1 servosaver in the C01/C02 so it should fit without an issue.
Both methods have the same effect, personally I think moving the holes further or closer apart is the better method since it keeps the steering more linear throughout the different positions.
Since the idea of low towers and short shocks on a IC car is out in the open now (NT1'13) I figured I post the ones I made.
Yes, not a issue.
But the question is why would you want that?
I've seen some use the NT1 servosaver in the C01/C02 so it should fit without an issue.
Both methods have the same effect, personally I think moving the holes further or closer apart is the better method since it keeps the steering more linear throughout the different positions.