SC10 Thread
#3886
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,974
From: Norwood, OH...and CCRCR and The OhioRCFactory
Don't know about anybody else, but ThunderbirdJunkie is not happy with his Ruluxes, what with them being egg shaped and all. Both sets are.
Stock AE wheels is what he will be buying from here on out until Pro Line releases a non-beadlock for the SC10
Stock AE wheels is what he will be buying from here on out until Pro Line releases a non-beadlock for the SC10
#3890
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,974
From: Norwood, OH...and CCRCR and The OhioRCFactory
Just scoured the PL site, did not see where it says the wheels are offered for the SC10.
So basically right now we're stuck with oval shaped Ruluxes or stock SC10 KMC Enduros.
So basically right now we're stuck with oval shaped Ruluxes or stock SC10 KMC Enduros.
#3892
Hey Erik, I figured out what was wrong. It was an error between the keyboard and chair 
What was happening was, the Ezrun had "profile 7" as default for the punch setting. It's not defined in the instruction book, but "profile 7" was pretty soft.
I then trial-and-errored profile 3, which worked good, so I thought "the lower the profile, the punchier it gets." So I switched it to profile 1 this time.
But it did not get punchier, it got weaker, I was wrong. After checking the manual (who would've "thunk" it...):
Profile 1 - Soft
Profile 2 - Normal
Profile 3 - Aggressive
Profile 4 - VERY Aggressive
Profile 5 and up - Undefined
For the EZrun, the Xeruns have Profile 5 and up, but I didn't look at the Xerun manual...
So I think I need to reprogram the ESC to profile 4 for the punch setting and it should cure my low-end torque. I'm fine with the top-end speed not being as fast (as my 4600Kv), which is to be expected, but I do need the "blip" to get over at least doubles and be able to swing the rear around 180-degree turns...
Yup, so it was error between keyboard and chair...


What was happening was, the Ezrun had "profile 7" as default for the punch setting. It's not defined in the instruction book, but "profile 7" was pretty soft.
I then trial-and-errored profile 3, which worked good, so I thought "the lower the profile, the punchier it gets." So I switched it to profile 1 this time.
But it did not get punchier, it got weaker, I was wrong. After checking the manual (who would've "thunk" it...):
Profile 1 - Soft
Profile 2 - Normal
Profile 3 - Aggressive
Profile 4 - VERY Aggressive
Profile 5 and up - Undefined
For the EZrun, the Xeruns have Profile 5 and up, but I didn't look at the Xerun manual...
So I think I need to reprogram the ESC to profile 4 for the punch setting and it should cure my low-end torque. I'm fine with the top-end speed not being as fast (as my 4600Kv), which is to be expected, but I do need the "blip" to get over at least doubles and be able to swing the rear around 180-degree turns...
Yup, so it was error between keyboard and chair...


#3893
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,974
From: Norwood, OH...and CCRCR and The OhioRCFactory
#3895
Other 17.5 might be a bit more punchier, but if you really want low-end torque and a good high-end RPM, I'd suggest looking into a 10.5 and 13.5 motors...
I put the Castle 4600Kv back in mine (equiv to about 12T), and now it flies...
#3897
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,520
From: Lost in the Dead Space between my Ears Somewhere around Wamego, KS (OZ Land)
#3898
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,974
From: Norwood, OH...and CCRCR and The OhioRCFactory

So, does anybody have a good link for how roll center affects handling? That's one thing that has never been played with on ThunderbirdJunkie's cars, and he noticed a fairly large difference when driving his truck today since putting the captured rod ends on the rear of the truck w/spacers.
#3899
How does one adjust antisquat? I know what it is but I don't know how it is adjusted. It's not adjusted by the degree of the toe in the carrier, right? I think it is something else
Z50king could use thunderbirdjunkies help
Z50king could use thunderbirdjunkies help
#3900
That will "angle" your rear arms up a bit, which is "anti-squat."



