Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Serpent Project 4-X >

Serpent Project 4-X

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Like Tree273Likes

Serpent Project 4-X

Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2017 | 05:50 PM
  #181  
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 529
Default

If some one is looking for setups, there is some here: http://site.petitrc.com/reglages/ser...Serpent4X.html
Arn0 is offline  
Old 01-02-2017 | 06:18 PM
  #182  
tunerjetta29's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 691
From: Fontana,CA
Default

I am running 17.5 blinky on a medium size indoor carpet track running jack blues. Anyone have a good recommendation for a starting fdr.
tunerjetta29 is offline  
Old 01-02-2017 | 06:46 PM
  #183  
bukil's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,023
From: BenTooWrah
Default

Does anyone have a spare heave damper they want to sell? Thanks.
bukil is offline  
Old 01-02-2017 | 07:34 PM
  #184  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,298
From: Raleigh, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by tunerjetta29
I am running 17.5 blinky on a medium size indoor carpet track running jack blues. Anyone have a good recommendation for a starting fdr.
Medium I'd say 4.20-4.0. I'm on a small track and way down at 4.59. Hats with a new actinium v2.
Antimullet is offline  
Old 01-03-2017 | 04:06 AM
  #185  
mac853's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,987
From: Dirty place
Default

Could anyone tell me if this car run well in blinky class on carpet track?

Best regards
mac853 is offline  
Old 01-03-2017 | 10:35 AM
  #186  
chicky03's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,994
Default

Originally Posted by mac853
Could anyone tell me if this car run well in blinky class on carpet track?

Best regards
Its more than capable, maybe one of the best cars out there! It placed 6th at the US indoor champs in stock tc, 4th and 5th in pro stock and won open stock at the Stock Wars in December.
chicky03 is offline  
Old 01-04-2017 | 08:52 PM
  #187  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,298
From: Raleigh, North Carolina
Default

I love the car for blinky 17.5 and USGT. It is very consistent and reacts well to changes.
I think the design is the coolest by far, and it's been very durable!
Antimullet is offline  
Old 01-11-2017 | 11:44 AM
  #188  
celt's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,570
From: /dev/null
Default I was concerned until...

I watched the YouTube videos from David Ehrbar. Wow, very nice design that makes a ton of sense.
celt is offline  
Old 01-17-2017 | 05:09 AM
  #189  
Joe Kimble's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,475
From: Miami, FL
Default

Hi everyone just wanted to provide some feedback on the Alu Chassis from Mc Factory since I ran it this weekend in Modified and 17.5..

The two big differences with the stock chassis is that it's much stiffer and a little heavier (by 15g). Both of these characteristics are an advantage on high grip carpet. For the extra weight, I compensated with Aluminum screws on top (all the ones screwing downwards). One of the key things here is that some weight was transferred down under the Center of Gravity of the car giving it different roll characteristics.

The main differences on the track are faster rotation overall and the car enters more agressively into the corners.

This is definitely a great option for Carpet Tracks...

Edit: I think it calls for a slightly softer suspension setup. I'll test more things this weekend.

Last edited by Joe Kimble; 01-17-2017 at 08:48 AM.
Joe Kimble is offline  
Old 01-17-2017 | 05:48 AM
  #190  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,138
From: Virginia
Default

Thanks dude, im glad it worked well for you.. i have more time by far making the 4X plates than anything else.
Racermac73 is offline  
Old 01-17-2017 | 07:44 AM
  #191  
Joe Kimble's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,475
From: Miami, FL
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Racermac73
Thanks dude, im glad it worked well for you.. i have more time by far making the 4X plates than anything else.
You got it man.. Thanks for making great products!
Joe Kimble is offline  
Old 01-17-2017 | 09:19 AM
  #192  
dan_vector's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 4,333
Default

Originally Posted by celt
I watched the YouTube videos from David Ehrbar. Wow, very nice design that makes a ton of sense.
Yeah the videos really helped understand just how easy the car is to work on and setup. I absolutely LOVE my 4x. Its the best TC I've ever driven and had the pleasure to work on.
dan_vector is offline  
Old 01-22-2017 | 04:19 AM
  #193  
celt's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,570
From: /dev/null
Default ride height

Gents,

Finished the build, no issues.

I did go back and decrease the pullrod rod length from 15.5mm to 15mm to get the ride height right in the middle of the range I wanted.

What is the result in changing the chassis connecting rods?
celt is offline  
Old 01-22-2017 | 07:24 PM
  #194  
Joe Kimble's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,475
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by celt
Gents,

Finished the build, no issues.

I did go back and decrease the pullrod rod length from 15.5mm to 15mm to get the ride height right in the middle of the range I wanted.

What is the result in changing the chassis connecting rods?
Hi! If you mean the rods that are horizontal/parallel to chassis, the result would be the same. They are just harder to reach.
Joe Kimble is offline  
Old 01-23-2017 | 05:45 AM
  #195  
celt's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,570
From: /dev/null
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Kimble
Hi! If you mean the rods that are horizontal/parallel to chassis, the result would be the same. They are just harder to reach.
Thanks Joe...

My solution was easier, I'm an idiot.

I couldn't figure out why ride height at the front of the car was exactly 1mm off the rear, with all dimensions being the same. I switched heave shocks rear to front and back again...no dice, the front sat 1mm lower than the rear.

Could only be one thing...

In walking around the manual, I made the front horizontal pushrods 15mm rather than the specified 14mm...just missed it - 1mm off.

Perfect! Ride height and tweak are spot on. Geez...
celt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.