Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread >

The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2014 | 02:22 PM
  #6901  
Brian C.'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,391
Default

Ok guys, I have the ORIGINAL B44 from when they used to run the chassis with the holes cut out for the NiCh batteries. I have just about have everything to make it a B44.2, I just want to know what route I should go chassis wise.... I would like a nice thorough explanation of what chassis I should go with (Avid or AE). Thank you.
Brian C. is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 02:24 PM
  #6902  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 656
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
any idea how to flat land this car and not slap maybe I need 14mm shocks
Land on the front wheels and when they torch the ground slam on the throttle and it smooths it outb
xTotalghost is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 02:36 PM
  #6903  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 656
Default

Originally Posted by Brian C.
Ok guys, I have the ORIGINAL B44 from when they used to run the chassis with the holes cut out for the NiCh batteries. I have just about have everything to make it a B44.2, I just want to know what route I should go chassis wise.... I would like a nice thorough explanation of what chassis I should go with (Avid or AE). Thank you.
When u say chassis I assume ur asking ether carbon or aluminum. And I would say 100% alumium. I run carbon cuz I got it used for 35$ cuz I drove a friends b44.2 with the avid chassis and wow did they get it right. It feels a lot more planted and the wait down low makes it roll but not flip over so more corner speed! The stuff works. But I run on indoor clay and I like to be nimble so I like my carbon but would switch to carbon is someone have me the chance
xTotalghost is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 02:42 PM
  #6904  
Brian C.'s Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,391
Default

Originally Posted by xTotalghost
When u say chassis I assume ur asking ether carbon or aluminum. And I would say 100% alumium. I run carbon cuz I got it used for 35$ cuz I drove a friends b44.2 with the avid chassis and wow did they get it right. It feels a lot more planted and the wait down low makes it roll but not flip over so more corner speed! The stuff works. But I run on indoor clay and I like to be nimble so I like my carbon but would switch to carbon is someone have me the chance
I am running on indoor clay as well. So which chassis is more nimble?
Brian C. is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 03:26 PM
  #6905  
gticlay's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,105
Default

Originally Posted by Brian C.
I am running on indoor clay as well. So which chassis is more nimble?
Sounds to me like the short graphite chassis is more nimble while the Avid chassis may feel a bit more stable. But I've only driven the +8 graphite chassis personally. Heck, just get me a +4 chassis
gticlay is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 03:46 PM
  #6906  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by xTotalghost
Land on the front wheels and when they torch the ground slam on the throttle and it smooths it outb
yeah, I do this too. I learned about that when I had the original b4. If the front wheels land slightly first, it take a lot of the slap out. The smaller doubles just need to be timed better. The big kicker table top....well, not much I can do about that. The jump was designed to launch the car really high.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 04:40 PM
  #6907  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
From: Pacific Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by turbo2cam
only one driver (barry baker) running the .1 from pics/results i've seen. he finished 24th out of 30 for invite drivers...with finishes between 8-10 in the rounds he ran. From all indications so far, everyone else was running AVID chassis. (BB is no slouch of a driver, so it could easily be inferred that the .1 chassis held him back!) And v2's? being better all around than BB's?!!! lmfao! Would love to see some PROOF of someone inside of the top 100 drivers running v2's lololol. WC sure does have some good ol stories though!

I also don't see any of the trcr fast guys on any a-main or b-main sheet. I see Luke Smith, but I do believe he calls Bremerton his home.

On to the next Wild "2 laps down" Cherry fairy tale!! lolol

I don't know your skill, so I won't comment on that, I will say I do know WC's skill set, he's not slow, better than me any day of the week and twice on Sunday's, I'm not trying to start anything here, but I'm gonna say it might be a taller order to actually beat him on the track than on the internet, he's a very accomplished driver, just my opinion.
jnyrcr is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 04:44 PM
  #6908  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

I am sure WC is a decent driver with the mountain of hours he has in practice. But is also in lala land sometimes. He was hard against MM for the longest time, but is saying RM is the past and anyone not running MM is slow. He seems to claim all of these things like they are in stone, then follows the next trend from his local racers and now that is Gospel. He is not very objective and has massive tunnel vision. He has AE blinders on for sure. Until AE made a MM, MM was crap. AE puts out the centro in the US and its the best thing ever. and so on.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 04:59 PM
  #6909  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Originally Posted by jnyrcr
I don't know your skill, so I won't comment on that, I will say I do know WC's skill set, he's not slow, better than me any day of the week and twice on Sunday's, I'm not trying to start anything here, but I'm gonna say it might be a taller order to actually beat him on the track than on the internet, he's a very accomplished driver, just my opinion.
a good sport never boasts or intimidates ...
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 05:04 PM
  #6910  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
From: Pacific Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
I am sure WC is a decent driver with the mountain of hours he has in practice. But is also in lala land sometimes. He was hard against MM for the longest time, but is saying RM is the past and anyone not running MM is slow. He seems to claim all of these things like they are in stone, then follows the next trend from his local racers and now that is Gospel. He is not very objective and has massive tunnel vision. He has AE blinders on for sure. Until AE made a MM, MM was crap. AE puts out the centro in the US and its the best thing ever. and so on.
I understand, lol, he's just trying to help, I was only commenting on his skill, like I said not trying to start anything here, wasn't trying to advocate any setup information, that's all over my head, lol, but calling him two lap down kinda talk just isn't true, I don't agree with everything he say's either, but I do respect him, hope we're cool.
jnyrcr is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 05:05 PM
  #6911  
Suspended
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,235
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Spencer Rivkin and RM were both running B44.1's. Hartson was running a B44.2 with the avid chassis dyed. (Avid and Jconcepts have crossover products, and since JC is his sponsor, he is required to cover up there logos)
Team G Racing is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 06:03 PM
  #6912  
Woulvesbaine's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,324
From: California
Default

This is a great car with the CF chassis. If you're running very competitively at your track, then try the different chassis options as tuning options. If you're that close to the next guy (ahead or behind) and you really love the class, then it's worth it.

If you're just getting into it or have a lot more to go till you're with the top guys then wheel it a bit more before you try a new chassis. That way when you do, you'll appreciate the differences more and be able to choose based on your feel for the car, which is ultimately what's most important.
Woulvesbaine is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 06:22 PM
  #6913  
Wade....'s Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 565
From: St. Paul
Default

^wise words.
Wade.... is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 08:34 PM
  #6914  
Blitzrockey's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,183
From: B.C Canada
Default

What chassis would you guys recommend for a medium to loose traction outdoor track? The stock one or the avid one? Thanks.
Blitzrockey is offline  
Old 01-27-2014 | 08:48 PM
  #6915  
gticlay's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,105
Default

Originally Posted by Blitzrockey
What chassis would you guys recommend for a medium to loose traction outdoor track? The stock one or the avid one? Thanks.
Medium to loose - you'll probably want to do the stock 44.2 chassis and use some sort of low bite setup to start with. JMO.
gticlay is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.