2LikesXray T4 '13
11-10-2012 | 01:28 AM
#1472
Tech Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 99
From: Australia
11-10-2012 | 02:20 AM
#1473
Tech Regular
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 421
After taking advice from on here I got a tornado fan myself. They call it tornado for a reason!
The best way to mount it is to use a servo post and screw the post in to the spare hole on the bulkhead. You can then just attach the fan to the post. Simple, effective, light and very secure!
The best way to mount it is to use a servo post and screw the post in to the spare hole on the bulkhead. You can then just attach the fan to the post. Simple, effective, light and very secure!
11-10-2012 | 01:01 PM
#1475
Tech Adept
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 166
From: Germany
Stupid question:
Does using 302525 instead of the plastic parts from kit affect the handling noticeably?
Also, has someone tried out the graphite a-arms and found the improvement in handling worth the money and time to install them?
Does using 302525 instead of the plastic parts from kit affect the handling noticeably?
Also, has someone tried out the graphite a-arms and found the improvement in handling worth the money and time to install them?
11-10-2012 | 02:04 PM
#1476
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,867
From: New Jersey
I'm building my T4 and I noticed there is excessive play on the shock ball ends.
Just too much play for a touring car.
I miked the steel ball insert with a xtra one from a T12 and its the same.
It seems to be the plastics,the shock cap and the ball end.It also seems to fit T4 only.I guess its a fluke?.Must be a bad plastic mold?
I wanted to run the new car this weekend..Oh well
Just too much play for a touring car.
I miked the steel ball insert with a xtra one from a T12 and its the same.
It seems to be the plastics,the shock cap and the ball end.It also seems to fit T4 only.I guess its a fluke?.Must be a bad plastic mold?
I wanted to run the new car this weekend..Oh well
11-10-2012 | 02:29 PM
#1477
http://www.teamxray.com/t4/details/
It says:
"Both front are rear shock absorbers have front and lower ball joints by purpose larger to provide a little of play of the shocks once mounted to generate more traction."
It says:
"Both front are rear shock absorbers have front and lower ball joints by purpose larger to provide a little of play of the shocks once mounted to generate more traction."
11-10-2012 | 02:32 PM
#1478
Tech Adept
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 166
From: Germany
The play is intended by Xray.
Quote from teamxray.com:
"Both front are rear shock absorbers have front and lower ball joints by purpose larger to provide a little of play of the shocks once mounted to generate more traction. "
EDIT: too slow
Quote from teamxray.com:
"Both front are rear shock absorbers have front and lower ball joints by purpose larger to provide a little of play of the shocks once mounted to generate more traction. "
EDIT: too slow
11-10-2012 | 03:10 PM
#1479
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,867
From: New Jersey
http://www.teamxray.com/t4/details/
It says:
"Both front are rear shock absorbers have front and lower ball joints by purpose larger to provide a little of play of the shocks once mounted to generate more traction."
It says:
"Both front are rear shock absorbers have front and lower ball joints by purpose larger to provide a little of play of the shocks once mounted to generate more traction."
I guess its optimized...
11-10-2012 | 04:02 PM
#1481
11-10-2012 | 06:50 PM
#1483
