Community
Wiki Posts
Search

RC10B4.1 FT/WC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2012 | 02:05 PM
  #22906  
Eli's Avatar
Eli
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,553
From: San Diego, CA.
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
I agree...but the sc10 4x4 shocks are metric...I still dont know why they didnt use that design. seems better than the v2 style. I never had leaks with my sc10 4x4 shocks. and they built really well
For one, the reason they didnt leak is because there was so much o-ring stiction that it would be nearly impossible for them to leak. Another reason why is they might not be as compact of a design then the v2 style shock bodies. Yet another idea, the plastic cartridge had issues when molded and some wouldn't thread in to the bodies which makes for another area that can fail.
Eli is offline  
Old 10-24-2012 | 06:06 PM
  #22907  
DLF
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 192
From: S.C.O.R.E. Savannah, GA
Default

Waflet, I assume you like running the truck chassis?

What kind of track do you run on? Ours is usually dry, low to med traction. Even in times when the traction is high, get out of the groove and it's loose city.

I have a truck and I've been thinking about swaping it over and give it a try. When would you not want to run the longer chassis?
DLF is offline  
Old 10-24-2012 | 06:25 PM
  #22908  
RC*PHREAK's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (147)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,404
Default

For the avid hub towers, the directions on avid's website say to put the washer in front of the nut. The stock screws don't stick out enough to get a nut on. Should I put longer screws on and put the nut on or just use the shorter thread locked screws?
RC*PHREAK is offline  
Old 10-24-2012 | 06:28 PM
  #22909  
CraigMBA's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,838
From: Valley of the Dirt, CA
Default

Originally Posted by RC*PHREAK
For the avid hub towers, the directions on avid's website say to put the washer in front of the nut. The stock screws don't stick out enough to get a nut on. Should I put longer screws on and put the nut on or just use the shorter thread locked screws?
Washers? Thread lock?

I got short screws, no loctite, and no problems.
CraigMBA is offline  
Old 10-24-2012 | 06:29 PM
  #22910  
Matt Trimmings's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (171)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,313
From: Tucson AZ
Default

Originally Posted by RC*PHREAK
For the avid hub towers, the directions on avid's website say to put the washer in front of the nut. The stock screws don't stick out enough to get a nut on. Should I put longer screws on and put the nut on or just use the shorter thread locked screws?
The washer and nut go on the ball stud, not the screws holding the tower to the hub.
Matt Trimmings is offline  
Old 10-24-2012 | 06:38 PM
  #22911  
RC*PHREAK's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (147)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,404
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Trimmings
The washer and nut go on the ball stud, not the screws holding the tower to the hub.
Ah, gotcha. Thanks.
RC*PHREAK is offline  
Old 10-24-2012 | 06:54 PM
  #22912  
Waflet's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,926
From: helena, alabama
Default

Originally Posted by DLF
Waflet, I assume you like running the truck chassis?

What kind of track do you run on? Ours is usually dry, low to med traction. Even in times when the traction is high, get out of the groove and it's loose city.

I have a truck and I've been thinking about swaping it over and give it a try. When would you not want to run the longer chassis?
Hideeho
yes, I really like the truck chassis. It makes it very easy to drive. I will caution you that I couldn't get it to turn at all with a full size pack. I can only get it to handle well with a shorty. I will also tell you that it required a completely different setup at an out door track that I would also give the same description for. When the buggy is set up for a track the advantage that the truck chassis gives is that it slows down the rotation of the chassis. When the rear starts to step out it is VERY easy to catch. The drawback of it is that it slows down the rotation of the chassis (yes, I know I said the same thing). If you are really, really good you want that twitchyness of the shorter chassis. It will allow you to a faster ultimate lap time, but only if your first name is Ryan, or your almost that good. If your skill has gotten to the point where you run a 10 minute main with out hitting the pipe or putting a wheel wrong, the truck chassis won't help you. For mere mortals, like the majority of us, getting a consistant lap 1/2 a second slower than the fastest lap will win the race when that fast guy spends 30 seconds on his roof.

I would describe my track exactly the same. I'm actually almost in your neck of the woods. I race at warehouse hobby raceway in Helena, AL. We are having 2 larger races coming up in December. the 1st is the Alabama State championship finale. We are expecting 100+ drivers. The 15th (I think) is the toys for tot race & should have a good draw.
Waflet is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 08:34 AM
  #22913  
ryanpatrickgore's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,025
From: TRCR
Default

Speed control is toast.

What do you guys like that is under 200?
I kinda like the idea of the gtb2 because it can also be a backup for my 4x4 with a 550.
Anybody have one?
ryanpatrickgore is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 08:54 AM
  #22914  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

I would get the HW120 or the orion 160 amp. It will work in both the sc10 4x4 and your buggy.

speed passion also makes some solid esc's.

This one is pretty good.
http://www.speedpassion.net/reventon/reventonpro.asp

I ran this esc in both 4x4 and b4. Smooth and works well. The lcd program box is pretty cheap to0.
http://www.falconsekido.com/products...s-esc-for-10th
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 08:55 AM
  #22915  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 529
Default

i love my tekin rs. but i have thought about the brushless hobbies, and one other that i forgot the name of
dezertranger96 is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 08:58 AM
  #22916  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 39
Default

Originally Posted by ryanpatrickgore
Speed control is toast.

What do you guys like that is under 200?
I kinda like the idea of the gtb2 because it can also be a backup for my 4x4 with a 550.
Anybody have one?
I have the GTB2. I'm currently looking for a new ESC because I don't like it. The drag brakes are completely ineffective for me. I can't tell a discernable difference between setting 1 or setting 13 (IIRC the highest setting #)- neither of which is strong enough for my liking. This ESC would have been gone a long time ago if it weren't for the price tage of a replacement. So, if you are a heavy Drag Brake user, my suggestion would be to look for a different ESC. Aside from the brakes, I have no complaints, it does its job adequately.
jason151 is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 09:04 AM
  #22917  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Originally Posted by ryanpatrickgore
Speed control is toast.

What do you guys like that is under 200?
I kinda like the idea of the gtb2 because it can also be a backup for my 4x4 with a 550.
Anybody have one?
Just don't waste $75 dollar's on one of those blue smoke bombs ....
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 09:07 AM
  #22918  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Personally I would look at this one. I have heard really good things about it, but it is at the top of your budget.

http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...-Brushless-ESC
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 09:08 AM
  #22919  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Just don't waste $75 dollar's on one of those blue smoke bombs ....
Pretty sure Novaks are orange......
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 10-25-2012 | 09:10 AM
  #22920  
bilster44's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 667
From: Sactown, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Waflet
Hideeho
yes, I really like the truck chassis. It makes it very easy to drive. I will caution you that I couldn't get it to turn at all with a full size pack. I can only get it to handle well with a shorty. I will also tell you that it required a completely different setup at an out door track that I would also give the same description for. When the buggy is set up for a track the advantage that the truck chassis gives is that it slows down the rotation of the chassis. When the rear starts to step out it is VERY easy to catch. The drawback of it is that it slows down the rotation of the chassis (yes, I know I said the same thing). If you are really, really good you want that twitchyness of the shorter chassis. It will allow you to a faster ultimate lap time, but only if your first name is Ryan, or your almost that good. If your skill has gotten to the point where you run a 10 minute main with out hitting the pipe or putting a wheel wrong, the truck chassis won't help you. For mere mortals, like the majority of us, getting a consistant lap 1/2 a second slower than the fastest lap will win the race when that fast guy spends 30 seconds on his roof.

I would describe my track exactly the same. I'm actually almost in your neck of the woods. I race at warehouse hobby raceway in Helena, AL. We are having 2 larger races coming up in December. the 1st is the Alabama State championship finale. We are expecting 100+ drivers. The 15th (I think) is the toys for tot race & should have a good draw.
Truck chassis's are illegally too long for sanctioned races.
bilster44 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.