Community
Wiki Posts
Search

RC10B4.1 FT/WC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2012 | 10:44 AM
  #13156  
Mxer59's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (114)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,703
From: Bakersfield, California
Default

Originally Posted by Tdiddy
From the B4.1 manual, they are 2". Part number 1406.
Thanks
Mxer59 is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 10:48 AM
  #13157  
elex300's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (111)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 4,622
From: Florida
Default

I don't care what you have to do to make the AE bb's work just start shipping them so I can get rid of these V2's.
elex300 is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:02 AM
  #13158  
Asharus's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,123
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by idrummerboy13
wow thats great nice! Won with mine friday night in 13.5. track was dryer out so it can be broken up for this weekends layout change. Felt horrible but i pulled the win.

Threw on maifields reedy setup to try for new layout..Zeroed out all my settings speedo and radio. Scuffed tires-IM SET!
grats guy! who was in the top 5?
Asharus is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:07 AM
  #13159  
OptimumRC's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by elex300
I don't care what you have to do to make the AE bb's work just start shipping them so I can get rid of these V2's.
Are the V2's what are holding you back? and as soon as you get the BB's you'll begin dominating.... I'm kidding, but find it funny when people make it sound like the V2's are whats holding them back from being the next Cav.
OptimumRC is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:11 AM
  #13160  
rdeppen's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,028
From: West Palm Bch FL
Default

Logic would dictate a new set of shock towers will be coming soon to go with the new AE big bore shocks. I doubt AE will release those and include an instruction sheet of where and how much to dremel off your car
rdeppen is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:12 AM
  #13161  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by OptimumRC
Are the V2's what are holding you back? and as soon as you get the BB's you'll begin dominating.... I'm kidding, but find it funny when people make it sound like the V2's are whats holding them back from being the next Cav.
never understood that. The V2's were the easiest to build and best lasting shocks I personally have ever used.
Bob Barry is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:31 AM
  #13162  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 413
From: LA, Cali
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Barry
never understood that. The V2's were the easiest to build and best lasting shocks I personally have ever used.
Yes sir! Althou, I think we'll see the BBs even sooner given the success/domination they've had over the w/e at the Cactus classic

Win Sunday, Sell Monday.
GuiltyByAssoc is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:36 AM
  #13163  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 413
From: LA, Cali
Default

Is that a Savox servo?
Attached Thumbnails RC10B4.1 FT/WC-sun-maifield2wmod.jpg  
GuiltyByAssoc is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:39 AM
  #13164  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,578
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Barry
never understood that. The V2's were the easiest to build and best lasting shocks I personally have ever used.
My desire for big bore shocks on the AE buggies has more to do with personal experience. I had the V2's on the b44.1, and felt the shocks were a poor match for the car. I would prefer a shock with a larger body, spring AND shaft to help alleviate the constant front shock shaft breakage I experienced with the b44.1. I also had issues with the rear springs rubbing on the shock body. It lead me to sell the buggy. Also, I am assuming a bigger beefier shock would be stronger. However, the V2's were a big improvement over the old shocks, and you are right. They were easy to build and somewhat consistant.

So, when it came time to purchase a buggy, I really liked the B4.1 but was hesitant because of my past experience with the v2'a on the b44.1. I opted for the Losi 22 but have not been happy. I have had moments with the car but never the consistency I had with the B4 in the past.

So now that I have seen the pros running big bore prototypes I am ready to make the move back to AE. I was told the big bores are coming soon. I seriously doubt big bores will make me a better driver and put me on the podium, but I feel a b4.1 with big bores is the ultimate weapon. Maifield and Cavalieri seemed to do pretty well with the big bores on their 4.1's this last weekend... Not to mention Maifields b44.1 was running the V2's with big bore springs.
zipperfoot is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 11:50 AM
  #13165  
t0p_sh0tta's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,863
From: Connecticut
Default

I'd rather break shock shafts than towers, bulkheads, etc.

Think of the speed you're carring with that 44, or any 4WD for that matter. If you hit something at those speeds, then something has to give.

It seems your biggest complaint was durability, and big bores definitely won't help there.
t0p_sh0tta is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 12:07 PM
  #13166  
idrummerboy13's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,021
From: Deer Park
Default

Originally Posted by Asharus
grats guy! who was in the top 5?
charlie, artie, peter, me, i forget who else, not in that order. Im am so glad about this layout. And i hope the track is never ever ever dry again. It was absolutely horrible LOL. Holes left and right.

THANKS!

btw, its funny how a.e is known for a bad shock. V2s are so great. the rebuild takes very little time and they are so simple. With bb springs they are very very good. Honestly I'm not going to run out and hunt those bbs when they are out. V2 with bb springs is very fast.
idrummerboy13 is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 12:10 PM
  #13167  
Asharus's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,123
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by idrummerboy13
charlie, artie, peter, me, i forget who else, not in that order. Im am so glad about this layout. And i hope the track is never ever ever dry again. It was absolutely horrible LOL. Holes left and right.

THANKS!

btw, its funny how a.e is known for a bad shock. V2s are so great. the rebuild takes very little time and they are so simple. With bb springs they are very very good. Honestly I'm not going to run out and hunt those bbs when they are out. V2 with bb springs is very fast.
nice, at least 3 AEs up there...
Asharus is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 12:41 PM
  #13168  
OptimumRC's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by zipperfoot
My desire for big bore shocks on the AE buggies has more to do with personal experience. I had the V2's on the b44.1, and felt the shocks were a poor match for the car. I would prefer a shock with a larger body, spring AND shaft to help alleviate the constant front shock shaft breakage I experienced with the b44.1. I also had issues with the rear springs rubbing on the shock body. It lead me to sell the buggy. Also, I am assuming a bigger beefier shock would be stronger. However, the V2's were a big improvement over the old shocks, and you are right. They were easy to build and somewhat consistant.

So, when it came time to purchase a buggy, I really liked the B4.1 but was hesitant because of my past experience with the v2'a on the b44.1. I opted for the Losi 22 but have not been happy. I have had moments with the car but never the consistency I had with the B4 in the past.

So now that I have seen the pros running big bore prototypes I am ready to make the move back to AE. I was told the big bores are coming soon. I seriously doubt big bores will make me a better driver and put me on the podium, but I feel a b4.1 with big bores is the ultimate weapon. Maifield and Cavalieri seemed to do pretty well with the big bores on their 4.1's this last weekend... Not to mention Maifields b44.1 was running the V2's with big bore springs.
You realize that the BB's won't have larger shock shafts right? And having larger shock shafts is a negative performance improvement, although it would be more durable.
OptimumRC is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 02:30 PM
  #13169  
Waflet's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,926
From: helena, alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Barry
never understood that. The V2's were the easiest to build and best lasting shocks I personally have ever used.
hideeho
The easiest shocks to rebuild were, by far, the losi XX series. the entire shock was bottom load. there was no shock cap. you unscrew the bottom which housed the seals in a cartridge & the shaft/piston came out with it. you could change the piston w/o emptying the oil. there was virtually never any waiting for bubbles. you could set your preload very precisely & easily. I dont understand why the bottom load cartridge shock didnt take off
Waflet is offline  
Old 03-26-2012 | 02:47 PM
  #13170  
onefast8's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,438
From: AZ
Default

Anyone have any up close photos of dremeling out the chassis for servo wires to run through the chassis braces?
onefast8 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.