Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
Boosted "Blinky" ESCs >

Boosted "Blinky" ESCs

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Boosted "Blinky" ESCs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2016 | 11:25 PM
  #1  
xevias's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 386
From: Shanghai, PRC
Default Boosted "Blinky" ESCs

Maybe not a new problem, but it's new to me.

Lately in Shanghai, Blinky ESCs have been coming directly from the factory with either pre-set additional timing or an ability to program timing and still have it blink.

Seeing how almost everything is made in China, I see US and EU starting to become infiltrated with these soon.

So, is there a technical check method to weed out the BS?
xevias is offline  
Old 12-18-2016 | 11:29 PM
  #2  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by xevias
Maybe not a new problem, but it's new to me.

Lately in Shanghai, Blinky ESCs have been coming directly from the factory with either pre-set additional timing or an ability to program timing and still have it blink.

Seeing how almost everything is made in China, I see US and EU starting to become infiltrated with these soon.

So, is there a technical check method to weed out the BS?
They wouldn't pass ROAR (or equivalent) approval so won't be race legal to start with.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 12-18-2016 | 11:40 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,323
From: Kirkland, WA
Default

The cheap stuff is made in China. The quality stuff is made in Taiwan.
Carnage9270 is offline  
Old 12-18-2016 | 11:54 PM
  #4  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (80)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,966
Default

Oscilloscope can check for "true" blinky but they don't come cheap...
Dan is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 12:15 AM
  #5  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 495
From: Bondurant, IA
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
They wouldn't pass ROAR (or equivalent) approval so won't be race legal to start with.
The hardware and firmware version could pass ROAR inspection, but releasing a new firmware and having users update it could negate it. Unless they start checking versions in tech it doesn't matter. Also, if someone knew what they were doing they could hack the legit firmware and add timing and still have it blink. People determined to cheat will find a way...the only way to find out if the ESC truly has zero timing is to check with an oscilloscope.
fenton06 is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 12:25 AM
  #6  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by fenton06
The hardware and firmware version could pass ROAR inspection, but releasing a new firmware and having users update it could negate it. Unless they start checking versions in tech it doesn't matter. Also, if someone knew what they were doing they could hack the legit firmware and add timing and still have it blink. People determined to cheat will find a way...the only way to find out if the ESC truly has zero timing is to check with an oscilloscope.
If a manufacturer did that, I'd expect ROAR to just revoke their approval. If an individual was determined enough to hack the firmware (it wouldn't be easy), then that's just sad. It wouldn't be worth it for a small performance bump, and a large one would draw the attention of the scrutineers.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 03:36 AM
  #7  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 120
Default

http://www.reilleymotorsports.com/product-page/bddf981b-f1d6-97cc-4430-9663c34cdc07
JETT is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 04:16 AM
  #8  
howardcano's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,784
From: Olathe, KS
Default

$129 DSO 203 pocket oscilloscope:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ARM-DSO-203-...cM1eu4QoQeyDJg

A short description on how to use it:
http://www.rctech.net/forum/14407610-post10.html
howardcano is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 04:39 AM
  #9  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,052
From: Holland
Default

Originally Posted by JETT
http://www.reilleymotorsports.com/product-page/bddf981b-f1d6-97cc-4430-9663c34cdc07
Are you kidding me?

215 dollar for just a current reader build up with an ebay 4 dollar meter?
OK, also there seems to be a 20 dollar PSU inside.....
Roelof is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 06:18 AM
  #10  
JimmyMac's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,445
From: NC
Default

I have heard a few people brag at our track that they have sent in their esc to have them "blink" for the price of a few hundred dollars. Yes, it's sad, but they usually have their butts handed to them anyways when they race the "fast" guys.
JimmyMac is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 10:29 AM
  #11  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 140
Default

We caught a guy cheating at our track this weekend, is sad in my opinion weather he was doing it on purpose or not- I'll give him the benefit of doubt this time. It was his first a-main and it was pretty freaking obvious when he was making 6-8' upon the straight every lap. Think I was more upset about having to tech his car than anything. He's a good driver that doesn't need to do that. Do I think people are constantly cheating? No will be my answer always. The top drivers don't cheat, knowing your equipment keeping it in good condition and getting the very best out of what you have will always lead to success. Ya there's always going to be "that guy" willing to spend $$ but hard work and practicing will get you anywhere you want to go. And for reference he was still .2-.3 tenths a lap slower than the top 2 cars that finished in front of him with cars that passed tech inspection.
Scirocco is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 10:39 AM
  #12  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,638
From: Long Island, NY
Default

It's not the top guys who cheat. It's the guys just below the top guys that cheat the most.
jiml is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 10:39 AM
  #13  
the rc guy's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,433
From: Detroit
Default

cheaters.. if there is a way they will find it..so sad..
the rc guy is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 10:44 AM
  #14  
Tech Master
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,455
From: Spokane, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Scirocco
We caught a guy cheating at our track this weekend, is sad in my opinion weather he was doing it on purpose or not- I'll give him the benefit of doubt this time. It was his first a-main and it was pretty freaking obvious when he was making 6-8' upon the straight every lap. Think I was more upset about having to tech his car than anything. He's a good driver that doesn't need to do that. Do I think people are constantly cheating? No will be my answer always. The top drivers don't cheat, knowing your equipment keeping it in good condition and getting the very best out of what you have will always lead to success. Ya there's always going to be "that guy" willing to spend $$ but hard work and practicing will get you anywhere you want to go. And for reference he was still .2-.3 tenths a lap slower than the top 2 cars that finished in front of him with cars that passed tech inspection.
This is a Gen 2 TrackStar 1S in question, correct? Was it blinking?
biz77 is offline  
Old 12-19-2016 | 10:49 AM
  #15  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,052
From: Holland
Default

Originally Posted by Scirocco
Do I think people are constantly cheating? No will be my answer always.
I do not agree....

Our Dutch onroad 1/8 had the top drivers from Holland and Belgium and I was pretty sure the complete main final were using tire sauce whch was not alowed. in the 2 years after this we have alowed tire sauce but people (even the same main final drivers) found it such a huge work so one of them made a proposal to get rid of the tire sauce which was voted for. And gues who was still having an unbelievable grip.....
To my opinion: once a cheater, always a cheater (if the technical inspection can not detect it)

That is why for every technical rule there must be a 100% detect tooling or else the rule has no use.
Roelof is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.