Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree8Likes

Lap Timing Decoder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2014 | 06:34 AM
  #346  
howardcano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,783
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by RollnThndr
Myself being an electronics novice, I need to ask, would it be a huge design change to get longer loop lengths?

I could see potential interest from other forms of racing (ie. auto, motocycle, etc) if the loop could accomodate greater lengths and transponders could send greater distances.
That would be a major change to the loop amplifier, but nothing else. It also moves the scope of the project beyond that of the RCTech forum. But it's still a very good question!

Increasing the transponder power requires a new output circuit, but the only technically challenging part of that is emissions compliance. This would, of course, require a new PC board.
howardcano is offline  
Old 02-10-2014 | 01:25 PM
  #347  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 61
From: Schoonebeek
Default

@notch johnson:
I have experienced in the Cano-design almost similar things: After sundown, the loop picks up a lot of environmental RF-signals. This is known from shortwave communications were sgnals travel much further during the night. Worldwide communications advantage from this fact. Normally you will not notice additional HF signals (around 5MHz) captured in the loop because the preamble-word needed to decode a valid transponder-ID is not met. The noise received from the sky after sundown has a random character. However I have added from the start of my experiments a monostabil multivibrator (1/2 74123 TTL) that is set to 100mS and controls a green LED by a transistor. The input is connected to the Valid-signal of the decoder. The LED blinks every time a car passes the loop. But also when environmental HF noise matches the set preamble word. To my surprice, after sundown the green LED is much more active compared to the situation during the day. Most passes of a car are still detected (they are send average every 3mS), but I still wonder whether others notice some degredation of sensitivity.

@notch: Could you try to start a test where the 11 - 12 hours of usage ends well before sundown to prevent the above explained to decrease the receiver sensitivty?
Thank you!
PA3EXV is offline  
Old 03-02-2014 | 10:05 AM
  #348  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Default Detection loop noise

Hey guys, I hope this isn't too off topic but I'm looking for some help and you'll seem like you might have my answers :-) (I hope!)

I just installed an indoor carpet track in my shop with an RC4 decoder. The coaxial run is approximately 30 ft long (copper shielded wire). The detection loop is 1 ft x 5 ft.

The noise level on the coaxial by itself is around 9 to 10. The noise level on the whole system with the detection loop connected is around 70 during the day and as it gets later in the evening sky rockets to about 150.

I have mounted the detection loop on a piece of cardboard and moved it around the room and up and down with no real difference in the noise floor.

During the day, the noise is not a big deal because the signal from the cars is close to 100 points over the noise. But by 7 to 8pm, I'm concerned that the signal to noise ratio will not be great enough to ensure accurate readings 100% of the time.

Is there any way to shield the loop, or anything else to minimize the noise introduced to the system?

Thanks a bunch for your help!

Shannon
Only Fine Helis is offline  
Old 03-02-2014 | 10:18 AM
  #349  
howardcano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,783
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by Only Fine Helis
Hey guys, I hope this isn't too off topic but I'm looking for some help and you'll seem like you might have my answers :-) (I hope!)

I just installed an indoor carpet track in my shop with an RC4 decoder. The coaxial run is approximately 30 ft long (copper shielded wire). The detection loop is 1 ft x 5 ft.

The noise level on the coaxial by itself is around 9 to 10. The noise level on the whole system with the detection loop connected is around 70 during the day and as it gets later in the evening sky rockets to about 150.

I have mounted the detection loop on a piece of cardboard and moved it around the room and up and down with no real difference in the noise floor.

During the day, the noise is not a big deal because the signal from the cars is close to 100 points over the noise. But by 7 to 8pm, I'm concerned that the signal to noise ratio will not be great enough to ensure accurate readings 100% of the time.

Is there any way to shield the loop, or anything else to minimize the noise introduced to the system?

Thanks a bunch for your help!

Shannon
I don't have any technical advice for you, since I have no experience using the Mylaps (or AMB) decoders.

Don't be afraid to start a new thread to get help! There are many knowledgeable people here on RCTech, and I'm sure many will have good advice. But you may not reach those people on this particular thread.

Forgive me for pointing out the obvious, but have you asked MyLaps for advice? I'm curious to hear their response.
howardcano is offline  
Old 03-02-2014 | 10:43 AM
  #350  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Default

Thanks Howard,

MyLaps response was basically to get the loop away from metal and devices conducting electricity. Given that I have moved it all around the confines of the room that it is in, I'm kinda stuck.

I asked them about any kind of gain settings (not squelch) and they weren't of much help there. One of the guys was going to their headquarters in Europe this weekend and he was going to ask the tech guys over there about it and let me know.

Thanks again,
Shannon
Only Fine Helis is offline  
Old 03-14-2014 | 02:51 AM
  #351  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks Howard!
Here is my decoder smd components, made ​​by the scheme Howard.
_h ttp://rc-auto.ru/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=31599
asterix_72 is offline  
Old 03-14-2014 | 02:55 AM
  #352  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2
Default

Loop Amplifier
h ttp://rc-auto.ru/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=31600
I can not spread links, posts a little.
asterix_72 is offline  
Old 03-14-2014 | 06:29 AM
  #353  
howardcano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,783
From: Olathe, KS
Default

They look great! Here are the photos:



howardcano is offline  
Old 03-30-2014 | 04:59 AM
  #354  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1
Default BPSK coding

I was looking at the BSPK signal to figure out the encryption. Is this information available ?

Last edited by rcrider126; 03-30-2014 at 11:22 AM.
rcrider126 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014 | 05:58 AM
  #355  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 48
Default

I finished the decryption protocol coding AMB
Payalneg is offline  
Old 04-04-2014 | 06:17 AM
  #356  
howardcano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,783
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by Payalneg
I finished the decryption protocol coding AMB
Fantastic! Can you share the details with us?
howardcano is offline  
Old 04-04-2014 | 07:06 AM
  #357  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 48
Default

convolutional codes and the Viterbi algorithm
Payalneg is offline  
Old 04-07-2014 | 10:12 AM
  #358  
Lolok33Fr's Avatar
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Payalneg
convolutional codes and the Viterbi algorithm
How do you apply the Viterbi algorithm on binaries data ?
Lolok33Fr is offline  
Old 04-07-2014 | 06:37 PM
  #359  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 26
Default

I was thinking about an RPi this before reading this thread. Great minds think alike. Im not a coder, but I would think a SDR receiver like the USB dongles found on ebay could work for decoding. I know some of them work for digital radio receiving on the ham bands for PSK31, etc.
StHanley is offline  
Old 04-07-2014 | 11:04 PM
  #360  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 20
Default

Originally Posted by StHanley
I was thinking about an RPi this before reading this thread. Great minds think alike. Im not a coder, but I would think a SDR receiver like the USB dongles found on ebay could work for decoding. I know some of them work for digital radio receiving on the ham bands for PSK31, etc.
The difficulty isn't in decoding, which is a problem Howard's excellent circuits handle fine. For accurate timing the problem is having a real time, low latency device capable of measuring the 'events' as they happen.

There are circuits in this thread which use a microcontroller to timestamp the data, these get good enough precision. Moving all decoding and timing to an FPGA (with averaging of multiple hits) gets both accuracy and precision even closer. Then there's the fancy analogue magic that AMB use (probably patented) that will get you the last bit of accuracy.

The Raspberry Pi is a great device but a normal operating system isn't going to get you accuracy or precision. You'll still need all of the decoding and timestamping to happen in a dedicated circuit.

Lastly many of the RTL SDR devices are designed as TV tuners (for DVB-T). These generally wont be able to tune low enough to get to 5Mhz-10Mhz. Even the HackRF (designed from the ground up as an SDR) isn't rated below 30Mhz.
edeca is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.