SMC LIPO BATTERY THREAD
#3903
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
I ran the new pack yesterday. I use the iCharger 308. Charged at 12 amps. The pit area was probably about 68-70 deg.
First cycle, the IR was 3.3/3.4
2nd cycle I discharged all the way down to 3.2 / cell and then back up at 12 amps. IR was 2.5/2.5
the rest of the day I did the same process. On the final cycle (maybe 6th one?) IR was 2.1/2.1
I can't say that I noticed a huge difference in the way the pack performed compared to my older 4300 pack. That one has IR numbers in the 3.2 range. I'm reserving judgement until I have another full race day on it. It's by no means a bad battery. I'm just not sold yet that I need this battery over the cheaper lower C version.
I was running 2wd buggy (17.5 class)
First cycle, the IR was 3.3/3.4
2nd cycle I discharged all the way down to 3.2 / cell and then back up at 12 amps. IR was 2.5/2.5
the rest of the day I did the same process. On the final cycle (maybe 6th one?) IR was 2.1/2.1
I can't say that I noticed a huge difference in the way the pack performed compared to my older 4300 pack. That one has IR numbers in the 3.2 range. I'm reserving judgement until I have another full race day on it. It's by no means a bad battery. I'm just not sold yet that I need this battery over the cheaper lower C version.
I was running 2wd buggy (17.5 class)
#3904
I ran the new pack yesterday. I use the iCharger 308. Charged at 12 amps. The pit area was probably about 68-70 deg.
First cycle, the IR was 3.3/3.4
2nd cycle I discharged all the way down to 3.2 / cell and then back up at 12 amps. IR was 2.5/2.5
the rest of the day I did the same process. On the final cycle (maybe 6th one?) IR was 2.1/2.1
I can't say that I noticed a huge difference in the way the pack performed compared to my older 4300 pack. That one has IR numbers in the 3.2 range. I'm reserving judgement until I have another full race day on it. It's by no means a bad battery. I'm just not sold yet that I need this battery over the cheaper lower C version.
I was running 2wd buggy (17.5 class)
First cycle, the IR was 3.3/3.4
2nd cycle I discharged all the way down to 3.2 / cell and then back up at 12 amps. IR was 2.5/2.5
the rest of the day I did the same process. On the final cycle (maybe 6th one?) IR was 2.1/2.1
I can't say that I noticed a huge difference in the way the pack performed compared to my older 4300 pack. That one has IR numbers in the 3.2 range. I'm reserving judgement until I have another full race day on it. It's by no means a bad battery. I'm just not sold yet that I need this battery over the cheaper lower C version.
I was running 2wd buggy (17.5 class)
..Have about 5 cycles on one pack so far.. looking to test out the other pack next weekend. I'll take some IR pic's from my iCharger 406
#3905
I ran the new pack yesterday. I use the iCharger 308. Charged at 12 amps. The pit area was probably about 68-70 deg.
First cycle, the IR was 3.3/3.4
2nd cycle I discharged all the way down to 3.2 / cell and then back up at 12 amps. IR was 2.5/2.5
the rest of the day I did the same process. On the final cycle (maybe 6th one?) IR was 2.1/2.1
I can't say that I noticed a huge difference in the way the pack performed compared to my older 4300 pack. That one has IR numbers in the 3.2 range. I'm reserving judgement until I have another full race day on it. It's by no means a bad battery. I'm just not sold yet that I need this battery over the cheaper lower C version.
I was running 2wd buggy (17.5 class)
First cycle, the IR was 3.3/3.4
2nd cycle I discharged all the way down to 3.2 / cell and then back up at 12 amps. IR was 2.5/2.5
the rest of the day I did the same process. On the final cycle (maybe 6th one?) IR was 2.1/2.1
I can't say that I noticed a huge difference in the way the pack performed compared to my older 4300 pack. That one has IR numbers in the 3.2 range. I'm reserving judgement until I have another full race day on it. It's by no means a bad battery. I'm just not sold yet that I need this battery over the cheaper lower C version.
I was running 2wd buggy (17.5 class)
I too was disappointed to see the FedEx only shipping options.
#3906
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Maybe because you were running that same battery and seeing incremental improvements each time, it was harder to notice. Between 3.2 and 2.1 I would think you'd be able too see/feel the difference if you ran them back to back. Plus I would not be surprised to see that 2.1 drop below 2 after a couple more cycles.
I too was disappointed to see the FedEx only shipping options.
I too was disappointed to see the FedEx only shipping options.
I will say that a few other guys at the same track yesterday were getting much more out of their batteries. One was running the Trinity pack and another Psycho Cells. They had IR's in the 1.4 to 1.8 range.
#3907
I think it might be tougher for a smaller guy to ship a large volume of potentially volatile or hazardous LiPos than other more inert products like fans, weights, or even ESCs. USPS may have conveyed to Danny that they won't take the LiPos without additional packaging which would increase his materials cost.
Given the hit and miss experience I've had with USPS lately, I'm fine paying $2 more or so to go with FedEx. My order arrived 3 days early as well.
Given the hit and miss experience I've had with USPS lately, I'm fine paying $2 more or so to go with FedEx. My order arrived 3 days early as well.
#3908
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Similar results I had but my IR was a little bit lower on average maybe because I was charging a little higher and discharging at 40amps
..Have about 5 cycles on one pack so far.. looking to test out the other pack next weekend. I'll take some IR pic's from my iCharger 406
..Have about 5 cycles on one pack so far.. looking to test out the other pack next weekend. I'll take some IR pic's from my iCharger 406
what are you guys charging at for the 4300 and the 4000? I wasn't sure how hard we can charge these things without risking them. I'm typically a mod guy so it doesn't make a ton of difference
#3909
I just ordered my resistor bank so I can discharge at 30 so I'm hoping I'll get some better numbers then once I can use it.
what are you guys charging at for the 4300 and the 4000? I wasn't sure how hard we can charge these things without risking them. I'm typically a mod guy so it doesn't make a ton of difference
what are you guys charging at for the 4300 and the 4000? I wasn't sure how hard we can charge these things without risking them. I'm typically a mod guy so it doesn't make a ton of difference
... I mostly run 13.5 so I tend to charge around 20amps have not had issues at all with any SMC pack over the past 2 years doing this
#3910
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
#3913
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
#3914
Bit disappointed about the weight of the new 4000mah shorty. Placed the order before the weight was advertised. Wanted it for my 17.5. It is heavier than both my 4500mah and 4600mah shorties.
Battery is solid; have 11 cycles on it. I guess I have another Mod battery. And, another addition to my 7x SMC battery family...
Battery is solid; have 11 cycles on it. I guess I have another Mod battery. And, another addition to my 7x SMC battery family...
#3915
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Bit disappointed about the weight of the new 4000mah shorty. Placed the order before the weight was advertised. Wanted it for my 17.5. It is heavier than both my 4500mah and 4600mah shorties.
Battery is solid; have 11 cycles on it. I guess I have another Mod battery. And, another addition to my 7x SMC battery family...
Battery is solid; have 11 cycles on it. I guess I have another Mod battery. And, another addition to my 7x SMC battery family...

honestly though, as long as it's not ridiculously heavier, I'm not worried about it. There's so many ways to drop weight on today's cars. I would rather have a little heavier battery and drop a little weight in other spots.



11Likes