![]() |
Originally Posted by millbank
(Post 8538055)
All done thanks, all i had to do was run as administrator .. :rolleyes:
btw I read somewhere that the new firmware, 110119STOCK is only for HW escs, and not SPs ... :sneaky:... best to go out and get an Xtreme Stock then ...
Originally Posted by 2wdrive
(Post 8538068)
... They have stronger magnets or something. My gues is that too much timing will not make them faster like the other motors but more gear together with a little dynamic timing will (maybe i am completly off here) ...
Originally Posted by 2wdrive
(Post 8538068)
... Talking about software. During the EPS there was a driver with a GM120 esc with some experimental software on it. It ran sensorless with a 17.5t motor and 2s lipo in our World GT class. It was the fastest car on the track. Pulled insane out of the corners and had the fastest topspeed. Faster then anything on the track.
|
Originally Posted by chinaman
(Post 8538178)
btw I read somewhere that the new firmware, 110119STOCK is only for HW escs, and not SPs ... :sneaky:... best to go out and get an Xtreme Stock then ... |
RE the new software
In the instructions it suggests using a turbo slope 0f 9/0.1s (same as 224) though on the box this not available the degree options are 3,6,12,18 (default), 24 or fastest, what is recommended for a 13.5T? |
Originally Posted by Barry_Hughes
(Post 8538766)
RE the new software
In the instructions it suggests using a turbo slope 0f 9/0.1s (same as 224) though on the box this not available the degree options are 3,6,12,18 (default), 24 or fastest, what is recommended for a 13.5T? (On 1/5 motorcycle running Nosram X11 17.5T) I set it at 6 for now... and let's see what gives,,, |
Originally Posted by MENTAL DENTAL
(Post 8537139)
What's axial play? Is it where the rotor floats end to end? :confused:
Cheers |
Re new software,
just checked the new 110119 and on my lcd programmer item 15 boost timing acceleration mine only goes to 50- 350 not the 750 as per instructions. Which is correct ? |
njt, my 110119 firmware lets me select up to 750 on setting 15.
I'd suggest you reflash the firmware. |
Originally Posted by cherry2blost
(Post 8538138)
To be honest, with the new additional timing the Hobbywing motors are very very good indeed and the thermal cutoff is a boon to the user, with no preset timing you can play to your hearts content with the timing boost etc and with the thermal system we have yet to kill a HW motor and at the pricing we think they are unbeatable. BTW we will be putting the motors in to the BRCA at the earliest opportunity to get them sanctioned (Hopefully).
Cheers all Cherry xx Are the new 17.5t Hw motors in yet??;) Dave |
Originally Posted by M7H
(Post 8539259)
Yes, the play the rotor has parrallel to it's "axis"....
Virtually none ie. < 0.3mm!! Could it be the receiver ariel 2.4Ghz that I run up a short ariel tube out the top and back down the outside held in place with the cap?? Or a software bg. It hasn't affected my other 17.5 car with another HW esc.:sweat: |
Originally Posted by MENTAL DENTAL
(Post 8539650)
Hiya,
Are the new 17.5t Hw motors in yet??;) Dave Havent got a lot so if you want one let me know will set you up pre order, www.racersinexile.org.uk |
Originally Posted by MENTAL DENTAL
(Post 8539757)
Or a software bg. It hasn't affected my other 17.5 car with another HW esc.:sweat:
|
Wow.... 60deg of timing!
Funny, next race meeting is at a track with a pretty open layout. Bye bye motor I'm going to cook you :D |
With new software, what FDR should I begin with on Medium size track with 17.5?
|
Originally Posted by 2wdrive
(Post 8538068)
They have stronger magnets or something. My gues is that too much timing will not make them faster like the other motors but more gear together with a little dynamic timing will (maybe i am completly off here).
During some tests we did, the only good way to improve the speed for these kinds of motors is lower the FDR. Because these motors' RPM can't be increased as expected when boost timing apply on it and it creates torque more than enough with that RPM. I think 101224 is better for these kinds of motors. |
Originally Posted by Barry_Hughes
(Post 8538766)
RE the new software
In the instructions it suggests using a turbo slope 0f 9/0.1s (same as 224) though on the box this not available the degree options are 3,6,12,18 (default), 24 or fastest, what is recommended for a 13.5T? And as we know, motors have totally different performance , so the suggestion on the instruction can only give a wide range for test on your own environment. please always start with a safe FDR and safe timing setting and measure your motor's temp after a pack. |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 10:04 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.