NOVAROSSI Engine thread....
#8476
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,121
I wasn't a fan of the P5 either.
#8478
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,121
As good tells me it's on par. Which isn't what I wanted, I wanted a motor that provided a stronger mid range, and a lot more top end without giving up fuel economy. I was much happier with the Legend 4 for 75-100$ more. Or a 7 port for $125 more. Were they twice the motor? Easily. Clearing a 65 foot triple or not is a large difference in lap times on a huge outdoor track. The elite 5 couldn't do it in buggy, and truggy I couldn't even imagine trying it. The 4 port could clear it, but you had to be perfect. The 7 port made it easy.
Everyone has their opinion. I ran all of these motors personally. On the track I race at, which is huge, the Elite 5 just wasn't enough for me.
#8480
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,121
#8481
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 855
From: Kingsport, TN (Still SC tho)
Any header and pipe recommendations for Mito 7 on both trug and bug?
Headers - I'm looking at 41020, 41021 and 41031. I see headers 41005, 41001 and 41019. They are shaped different. Are these current headers? Pipe options seem to be 51006M, 51016 and 51020M. Is the 20 a smoother pipe?
Headers - I'm looking at 41020, 41021 and 41031. I see headers 41005, 41001 and 41019. They are shaped different. Are these current headers? Pipe options seem to be 51006M, 51016 and 51020M. Is the 20 a smoother pipe?
Last edited by qstorm777; 11-15-2015 at 04:32 PM.
#8482
Tech Adept
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 142
From: Greece
Any header and pipe recommendations for Mito 7 on both trug and bug?
Headers - I'm looking at 41020, 41021 and 41031. I see headers 41005, 41001 and 41019. They are shaped different. Are these current headers? Pipe options seem to be 51006M, 51016 and 51020M. Is the 20 a smoother pipe?
Headers - I'm looking at 41020, 41021 and 41031. I see headers 41005, 41001 and 41019. They are shaped different. Are these current headers? Pipe options seem to be 51006M, 51016 and 51020M. Is the 20 a smoother pipe?
#8484
#8485
Tech Adept
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 142
From: Greece
i dont have one ,but the buggy next to me on track has it ,looks great sounds great but not so loud ,looks perfectly balanced ,i always put myhands over the engine to feel the vibes,,,haha ,you will not be disapointed
#8486
Tech Adept
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 142
From: Greece
yes depends from the engine ,i find the 9853 the thin one not the ss better for top end and always better in accelaration ,the 9901 always is better for saving fuel and mrrd rps ,these days i am testing 2096,loks like 2096 is also bad ass ,i am testing with all the headers that i have and i was surprised its giving the best with an rb header,,,,after all thats why this hobby is so cool,,,
#8487
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 89
Any header and pipe recommendations for Mito 7 on both trug and bug?
Headers - I'm looking at 41020, 41021 and 41031. I see headers 41005, 41001 and 41019. They are shaped different. Are these current headers? Pipe options seem to be 51006M, 51016 and 51020M. Is the 20 a smoother pipe?
Headers - I'm looking at 41020, 41021 and 41031. I see headers 41005, 41001 and 41019. They are shaped different. Are these current headers? Pipe options seem to be 51006M, 51016 and 51020M. Is the 20 a smoother pipe?
#8488
Tech Adept
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 142
From: Greece
I couldn't imagine ever needing to run a 9901 on my Truggy. Bash_bros is right, the 9853 is usually a Truggy pipe and the 9901 for Buggy. I ran a 2096 on Truck for awhile, but quite honestly, it didn't do much for me. I also ran it in place of a 9901 in Buggy with a 7-port for awhile, and that turned out to be a decent combo.
#8489
its all about the manifold...... the manifold will almost matter more then the tuned pipe.......... the mellowest manifold is a 41021, especially on the extra long stroke engines....doesn't mater if its a 9886 or a 9901 as long as its on a 41021 the power will be toned down......... Swap over to a 41001 and the 9901 will become a monster and 9886 will be even moreso a monster........ My advice for a Legend 7 is a 9886/41001, 9901/41001, 9853/41001......you could also check out the 41032 manifold...... avoid the 41021 as the extra long stroke don't like it overly much, loses about 15 % power as opposed to the 41001
#8490
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 855
From: Kingsport, TN (Still SC tho)
its all about the manifold...... the manifold will almost matter more then the tuned pipe.......... the mellowest manifold is a 41021, especially on the extra long stroke engines....doesn't mater if its a 9886 or a 9901 as long as its on a 41021 the power will be toned down......... Swap over to a 41001 and the 9901 will become a monster and 9886 will be even moreso a monster........ My advice for a Legend 7 is a 9886/41001, 9901/41001, 9853/41001......you could also check out the 41032 manifold...... avoid the 41021 as the extra long stroke don't like it overly much, loses about 15 % power as opposed to the 41001
So 9901 is a little smoother than 9886. Where does the 9853 fit compared to these two. Can someone compare all three pipes by torque, top end speed and fuel mileage? I know the manifolds affect torque and top end. Do they affect fuel mileage?



352Likes