Kyosho VoneR Thread
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Taylor-Racing
What your saying is that a softer chassis would be acting like a spring, yeah?
If so, then why not have a ridgid chassis that is a more controlled predictable platform and change springs to accommodate whatever springing is required?
What your saying is that a softer chassis would be acting like a spring, yeah?
If so, then why not have a ridgid chassis that is a more controlled predictable platform and change springs to accommodate whatever springing is required?
the more flex the chassis, the more over traction you will get but you need to give up suspension efficiency.
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
Originally posted by Taylor-Racing
Hi Tommy,
Haven't heard from you in ages.
Yeah, I've seen a couple of Morgans on the track.
. . . that sliding pillar suspension is really impressive . . NOT.
Hi Tommy,
Haven't heard from you in ages.
Yeah, I've seen a couple of Morgans on the track.
. . . that sliding pillar suspension is really impressive . . NOT.
I'm doing my home work very hard to made a big bang next year
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Manticore
a chassis is a chassis but not a spring. if you think so, you need spring as your chassis.
the more flex the chassis, the more over traction you will get but you need to give up suspension efficiency.
a chassis is a chassis but not a spring. if you think so, you need spring as your chassis.
the more flex the chassis, the more over traction you will get but you need to give up suspension efficiency.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Taylor-Racing
Yes, that's my thinking also - you will give up suspension efficiency.
Yes, that's my thinking also - you will give up suspension efficiency.
Originally posted by tl2111
I'm doing my home work very hard to made a big bang next year
I'm doing my home work very hard to made a big bang next year
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Manticore
higher suspension efficiency mean higher stress to tire. now you can figure it out.
higher suspension efficiency mean higher stress to tire. now you can figure it out.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Taylor-Racing
But what if you soften the suspension for rubber tyres? - same thing isn't it?
But what if you soften the suspension for rubber tyres? - same thing isn't it?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Manticore
they are not the same thing. flex chassis is more easy to drive and less sensitive to suspension adjustment and less stress on tire.
they are not the same thing. flex chassis is more easy to drive and less sensitive to suspension adjustment and less stress on tire.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Taylor-Racing
Oh, now I see . . . it's slower!
Oh, now I see . . . it's slower!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Notice
Originally posted by Taylor-Racing
Oh, now I see . . . it's slower!
Oh, now I see . . . it's slower!
Tech Elite
Originally posted by Manticore
i dont use 27T standard pulley so i am not interested to know about the part number!
i dont use 27T standard pulley so i am not interested to know about the part number!
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
Locked oneway
I'm interested in locking my front oneway, so that I can have the benefit of brakes and the drive out of the corner that the oneway gives. If you have tried this I would be interested in how you liked it and if there is part available to do this.
Serpent have this option for the 705 and I assume the 710 where you put a couple of pins in the front diff to lock it.
Serpent have this option for the 705 and I assume the 710 where you put a couple of pins in the front diff to lock it.
Tech Master
Originally posted by esham
What is your opinion with the 25T OD againts the std 27T, Manti?
What is your opinion with the 25T OD againts the std 27T, Manti?
I am sure someone else who could elaborate this subject a little better than me
Overdrives
Originally posted by HEYALIGNMENTGUY
I am not manti as you can see, but I will give you my reason. I think its simple foam tires do not wear at the same rate. as in the front wears slower than the rear. So with the overdrive you can cut your tires at different sizes and end up with same wear rate.
I am sure someone else who could elaborate this subject a little better than me
I am not manti as you can see, but I will give you my reason. I think its simple foam tires do not wear at the same rate. as in the front wears slower than the rear. So with the overdrive you can cut your tires at different sizes and end up with same wear rate.
I am sure someone else who could elaborate this subject a little better than me
Tech Elite
Originally posted by HEYALIGNMENTGUY
I am not manti as you can see, but I will give you my reason. I think its simple foam tires do not wear at the same rate. as in the front wears slower than the rear. So with the overdrive you can cut your tires at different sizes and end up with same wear rate.
I am sure someone else who could elaborate this subject a little better than me
I am not manti as you can see, but I will give you my reason. I think its simple foam tires do not wear at the same rate. as in the front wears slower than the rear. So with the overdrive you can cut your tires at different sizes and end up with same wear rate.
I am sure someone else who could elaborate this subject a little better than me
Originally posted by apmk
Futher to what you mention, I thought with smaller front tires, you'll have better turning into corners. Not too sure bout it though, jus my 2 cents...
Futher to what you mention, I thought with smaller front tires, you'll have better turning into corners. Not too sure bout it though, jus my 2 cents...
The moral of the explaination - Issssss... i need to try that OD setup.